108.60
W
W
W
W
W
CEZ Nymburk
Czech Republic
Wednesday Nov 19, 2025 - 12:00 (America/New_York)
CEZ Nymburk vs NH Ostrava
Stats, H2H, Live Scores & xG
80.20
W
L
L
L
L
NH Ostrava
Scoring Intelligence Panel
CEZ Nymburk vs NH Ostrava
N/A
Possessions / Game
League Average: N/A
176
Points / Match
League Average: 170
19.4
( High )
Volatility
League Average: 15.7
🟢 Green = favorable situation (high pace, strong over trend, or very stable totals) ✅ ·
⚪ Gray = neutral, close to league average 👌 ·
🟡 Yellow / 🟠 Orange = warning, results can swing more than usual ⚠️ ·
🔴 Red = unfavorable / high risk (low pace for overs, strong under lean, or very volatile games) ❌
Head to Head Statistics
CEZ Nymburk vs NH Ostrava
All Time
Last 3 Games
17%
Over 160.5
5 / 30
43%
Over 170.5
13 / 30
40%
Over 180.5
12 / 30
🟢 Green = value ✅ ·
🟡 Yellow = risky ⚠️ ·
🔴 Red = skip ❌
0%
Over 160.5
0 / 3
33%
Over 170.5
1 / 3
67%
Over 180.5
2 / 3
🟢 Green = value ✅ ·
🟡 Yellow = risky ⚠️ ·
🔴 Red = skip ❌
Scoring Momentum (Recent Form)
| Metric | CEZ Nymburk | NH Ostrava |
|---|---|---|
| Average Total Points (Last 5 Games) | 180.40 | 186.20 |
| Previous 5 Avg | 173.20 | 169.40 |
| Trend Line (Last 5 Games) | 190, 170, 210, 152, 180 | 206, 204, 182, 152, 187 |
🟢 Green = value ✅ ·
🟡 Yellow = risky ⚠️ ·
🔴 Red = skip ❌
Team performance vs top opponents
scoring, conceding, and net rating.
| Metric | CEZ Nymburk | NH Ostrava |
|---|---|---|
| Avg Pts vs Top 5 Def | 93.3 | 84.8 |
| Avg Pts Conceded vs Top 5 Off | 84.7 | 95.8 |
| Net Rating vs Top 5 Opps | 0.0 | 0.0 |
🟢 Green = value ✅ ·
🟡 Yellow = risky ⚠️ ·
🔴 Red = skip ❌ —
Values are compared to the team's own season average.
These indicators reflect performance against top opponents (TOP 5 offenses and defenses) and help assess true team strength.
Recent momentum
last 5 vs previous 5 games.
CEZ Nymburk
NH Ostrava
| Period | Avg Points Scored | Avg Points Conceded | Net Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last 5 | 102.4 | 83.8 | +18.6 |
| Previous 5 | 96.4 | 72.2 | +24.2 |
| Period | Avg Points Scored | Avg Points Conceded | Net Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last 5 | 92.0 | 94.6 | -2.6 |
| Previous 5 | 84.2 | 87.6 | -3.4 |
🟢 Green = improving form 📈 ·
🟡 Yellow = neutral ➖ ·
🔴 Red = declining form 📉 —
Momentum analysis shows whether the team has recently been improving in offense and defense, or on the contrary – losing stability.
CEZ Nymburk
Czech Republic - Narodni Basketbalova Liga
League Pos.
1 / 12
| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall |
W
W
W
W
W
|
98.91 |
| Home |
W
W
W
W
W
|
108.60 |
| Away |
W
W
W
W
W
|
90.83 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Total Points Avg | 175.27 | 185 | 167.16 |
| Scored | 98.91 | 108.60 | 90.83 |
| Conceded | 76.36 | 76.40 | 76.33 |
| Pace Avg | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Off. Rating | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Def. Rating | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ATS Cover % | 0% | 0% | 0% |
* Pace is not a value indicator but shows game tempo — higher numbers mean faster play and more possessions.
NH Ostrava
Czech Republic - Narodni Basketbalova Liga
League Pos.
9 / 12
| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall |
L
W
L
W
W
|
87.33 |
| Home |
L
W
L
W
L
|
92.43 |
| Away |
W
L
L
L
L
|
80.20 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 25.0% | 28.6% | 20.0% |
| Total Points Avg | 177.41 | 185.43 | 166.2 |
| Scored | 87.33 | 92.43 | 80.20 |
| Conceded | 90.08 | 93.00 | 86.00 |
| Pace Avg | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Off. Rating | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Def. Rating | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ATS Cover % | 0% | 0% | 0% |
* Pace is not a value indicator but shows game tempo — higher numbers mean faster play and more possessions.
Scoring consistency tracker
Last 10 games & full season
Last 3
Last 5
Last 10 ⚠️
Season
CEZ Nymburk is +38% better in terms of Points Scored
CEZ Nymburk at Home
NH Ostrava at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Scored Per Game | CEZ Nymburk | NH Ostrava |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 100% | 0% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 67% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 0% | 33% |
🟢 Green = potential value signal · 🟡 Yellow = needs confirmation · 🔴 Red = caution. Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
CEZ Nymburk is +35% better in terms of Points Scored
CEZ Nymburk at Home
NH Ostrava at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Scored Per Game | CEZ Nymburk | NH Ostrava |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 100% | 0% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 60% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 0% | 40% |
🟢 Green = potential value signal · 🟡 Yellow = needs confirmation · 🔴 Red = caution. Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
CEZ Nymburk is +35% better in terms of Points Scored
CEZ Nymburk at Home
NH Ostrava at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Scored Per Game | CEZ Nymburk | NH Ostrava |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 100% | 0% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 60% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 0% | 40% |
🟢 Green = potential value signal · 🟡 Yellow = needs confirmation · 🔴 Red = caution. Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
CEZ Nymburk is +35% better in terms of Points Scored
CEZ Nymburk at Home
NH Ostrava at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Scored Per Game | CEZ Nymburk | NH Ostrava |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 100% | 0% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 60% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 0% | 40% |
🟢 Green = potential value signal · 🟡 Yellow = needs confirmation · 🔴 Red = caution. Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Offensive Efficiency & Shooting Profile
Where Teams Gain or Lose Value
🟢 Green = strong efficiency or shooting edge · 🟡 Yellow = balanced/average · 🔴 Red = weakness, needs caution. Some stats (like 3P Rate and FT Rate) indicate playing style, not necessarily good or bad — interpret in context.
Possession Control & Rebounding
Assists. Turnovers. Pace
Defensive Consistency vs Season Average
Last 10 & season games
Last 3
Last 5
Last 10 ⚠️
Season
CEZ Nymburk is +4% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
CEZ Nymburk at Home
NH Ostrava at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Conceded Per Game | CEZ Nymburk | NH Ostrava |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 33% | 33% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 33% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 67% | 33% |
🟢 Green = strong defensive hold (unders-friendly) · 🟡 Yellow = neutral · 🔴 Red = weak defense (overs risk). Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
CEZ Nymburk is +11% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
CEZ Nymburk at Home
NH Ostrava at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Conceded Per Game | CEZ Nymburk | NH Ostrava |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 20% | 40% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 40% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 80% | 20% |
🟢 Green = strong defensive hold (unders-friendly) · 🟡 Yellow = neutral · 🔴 Red = weak defense (overs risk). Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
CEZ Nymburk is +11% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
CEZ Nymburk at Home
NH Ostrava at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Conceded Per Game | CEZ Nymburk | NH Ostrava |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 20% | 40% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 40% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 80% | 20% |
🟢 Green = strong defensive hold (unders-friendly) · 🟡 Yellow = neutral · 🔴 Red = weak defense (overs risk). Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
CEZ Nymburk is +11% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
CEZ Nymburk at Home
NH Ostrava at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Conceded Per Game | CEZ Nymburk | NH Ostrava |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 20% | 40% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 40% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 80% | 20% |
🟢 Green = strong defensive hold (unders-friendly) · 🟡 Yellow = neutral · 🔴 Red = weak defense (overs risk). Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Defensive Matchup
Edge Style vs Style
🟢 Green = Clear defensive edge (profitable trend) · 🟡 Yellow = Neutral (no big edge) · 🔴 Red = Weak defense / exploitable
Defensive Pressure & Disruption
Who Forces Mistakes?
🟢 Green = Strong edge · 🟡 Yellow = Average · 🔴 Red = Weak edge
* Rate = per 100 possessions. · Others = per game averages.
Total Points Hit-Rate
Scoring trends 10 & seasone games
Last 3
Last 5
Last 10 ⚠️
Season
Over X Points
Under X Points
| Match Points | CEZ Nymburk | NH Ostrava | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 150.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Over 160.5 | 100% | 60% | 80% |
| Over 170.5 | 80% | 40% | 60% |
| Over 180.5 | 40% | 20% | 30% |
| Over 190.5 | 20% | 0% | 10% |
| Over 200.5 | 20% | 0% | 10% |
| Over 210.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | CEZ Nymburk | NH Ostrava | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 150.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Under 160.5 | 0% | 40% | 20% |
| Under 170.5 | 20% | 60% | 40% |
| Under 180.5 | 60% | 80% | 70% |
| Under 190.5 | 80% | 100% | 90% |
| Under 200.5 | 80% | 100% | 90% |
| Under 210.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
🟢 Green = Strong over-trend· 🟡 Yellow = Balanced · 🔴 Red = Weak over-trend
Over X Points
Under X Points
| Match Points | CEZ Nymburk | NH Ostrava | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 150.5 | 67% | 67% | 67% |
| Over 160.5 | 67% | 0% | 33% |
| Over 170.5 | 67% | 0% | 33% |
| Over 180.5 | 67% | 0% | 33% |
| Over 190.5 | 33% | 0% | 17% |
| Over 200.5 | 33% | 0% | 17% |
| Over 210.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | CEZ Nymburk | NH Ostrava | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 150.5 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| Under 160.5 | 33% | 100% | 67% |
| Under 170.5 | 33% | 100% | 67% |
| Under 180.5 | 33% | 100% | 67% |
| Under 190.5 | 67% | 100% | 83% |
| Under 200.5 | 67% | 100% | 83% |
| Under 210.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
🟢 Green = Strong over-trend· 🟡 Yellow = Balanced · 🔴 Red = Weak over-trend
Over X Points
Under X Points
| Match Points | CEZ Nymburk | NH Ostrava | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 150.5 | 80% | 80% | 80% |
| Over 160.5 | 80% | 40% | 60% |
| Over 170.5 | 80% | 40% | 60% |
| Over 180.5 | 40% | 20% | 30% |
| Over 190.5 | 20% | 0% | 10% |
| Over 200.5 | 20% | 0% | 10% |
| Over 210.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | CEZ Nymburk | NH Ostrava | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 150.5 | 20% | 20% | 20% |
| Under 160.5 | 20% | 60% | 40% |
| Under 170.5 | 20% | 60% | 40% |
| Under 180.5 | 60% | 80% | 70% |
| Under 190.5 | 80% | 100% | 90% |
| Under 200.5 | 80% | 100% | 90% |
| Under 210.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
🟢 Green = Strong over-trend· 🟡 Yellow = Balanced · 🔴 Red = Weak over-trend
Over X Points
Under X Points
| Match Points | CEZ Nymburk | NH Ostrava | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 150.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Over 160.5 | 100% | 60% | 80% |
| Over 170.5 | 80% | 40% | 60% |
| Over 180.5 | 40% | 20% | 30% |
| Over 190.5 | 20% | 0% | 10% |
| Over 200.5 | 20% | 0% | 10% |
| Over 210.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | CEZ Nymburk | NH Ostrava | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 150.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Under 160.5 | 0% | 40% | 20% |
| Under 170.5 | 20% | 60% | 40% |
| Under 180.5 | 60% | 80% | 70% |
| Under 190.5 | 80% | 100% | 90% |
| Under 200.5 | 80% | 100% | 90% |
| Under 210.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
🟢 Green = Strong over-trend· 🟡 Yellow = Balanced · 🔴 Red = Weak over-trend
CEZ Nymburk -
Player Projections
Small sample for some players
Last 5 Games
Last 10 Games
Season
List of OUT players:
Reset all to IN
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Jakub TUMA | |||||||||||||
| J.t. Shumate | |||||||||||||
| Frantisek Rylich | |||||||||||||
| Vojtech Hruban | |||||||||||||
| Ryland Thomas Holt | |||||||||||||
| Peter Kovacik | |||||||||||||
| Stephen Brown | |||||||||||||
| Tylan Birts | |||||||||||||
| Matej SVOBODA | |||||||||||||
| Christian Bishop | |||||||||||||
| Tomas Mikyska | |||||||||||||
| Jaromir Bohacik | |||||||||||||
| Ondrej Sehnal | |||||||||||||
| Nighael Ceaser | |||||||||||||
| Martin Kriz |
List of OUT players:
Reset all to IN
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Jakub TUMA | |||||||||||||
| J.t. Shumate | |||||||||||||
| Frantisek Rylich | |||||||||||||
| Vojtech Hruban | |||||||||||||
| Ryland Thomas Holt | |||||||||||||
| Peter Kovacik | |||||||||||||
| Stephen Brown | |||||||||||||
| Tylan Birts | |||||||||||||
| Matej SVOBODA | |||||||||||||
| Christian Bishop | |||||||||||||
| Tomas Mikyska | |||||||||||||
| Jaromir Bohacik | |||||||||||||
| Ondrej Sehnal | |||||||||||||
| Nighael Ceaser | |||||||||||||
| Martin Kriz |
List of OUT players:
Reset all to IN
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Jakub TUMA | |||||||||||||
| J.t. Shumate | |||||||||||||
| Frantisek Rylich | |||||||||||||
| Vojtech Hruban | |||||||||||||
| Ryland Thomas Holt | |||||||||||||
| Peter Kovacik | |||||||||||||
| Stephen Brown | |||||||||||||
| Tylan Birts | |||||||||||||
| Matej SVOBODA | |||||||||||||
| Christian Bishop | |||||||||||||
| Tomas Mikyska | |||||||||||||
| Jaromir Bohacik | |||||||||||||
| Ondrej Sehnal | |||||||||||||
| Nighael Ceaser | |||||||||||||
| Martin Kriz |
* Colored values are our “value check” candidates. Always compare with market lines before deciding.
Roasters & Injured Players
CEZ Nymburk
NH Ostrava
Roasters
No roster players listed for this team.
Injured
No injured players listed for either team.
| # | Team | W | L | PCT | PPG | OPP PPG | DIFF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CEZ Nymburk | 13 | 0 | 1.000 | 98.9 | 77.2 | - |
| 2 | Basketbol Brno | 10 | 0 | 1.000 | 96.8 | 78.9 | - |
| 3 | BK Pardubice | 9 | 4 | 0.692 | 93.8 | 80.0 | - |
| 4 | Srsni Pisek | 9 | 5 | 0.643 | 89.8 | 88.1 | - |
| 5 | BK Opava | 8 | 5 | 0.615 | 91.2 | 83.1 | - |
| 6 | BK Decin | 8 | 5 | 0.615 | 79.6 | 82.3 | - |
| 7 | Sluneta Usti nad Labem | 5 | 9 | 0.357 | 82.9 | 84.0 | - |
| 8 | BK Olomoucko | 4 | 9 | 0.308 | 72.9 | 80.2 | - |
| 9 | NH Ostrava | 4 | 10 | 0.286 | 86.4 | 90.1 | - |
| 10 | Slavia Prague | 3 | 10 | 0.231 | 80.7 | 94.5 | - |
| 11 | GAPA Hradec Kralove | 3 | 10 | 0.231 | 73.5 | 87.9 | - |
| 12 | USK Prague | 2 | 11 | 0.154 | 76.7 | 92.4 | - |
Monthly & Opponent Breakdown (How to Use)
Compares a team/player’s overall averages to their performance vs a specific opponent.
Why it’s useful:
Betting use:
Game Outcome Summary (How to Use)