86.40
L
W
W
W
L
Limburg
/ BNXT
Friday Dec 05, 2025 - 14:30 (America/New_York)
Limburg vs Kortrijk
Stats, H2H, Live Scores & xG
89.50
W
L
L
L
Kortrijk
Note: The current season has recently started, and one or both teams have played fewer than 5 matches.
Scoring Intelligence Panel
Limburg vs Kortrijk
How to use
N/A
Possessions / Game
League Average: N/A
167
Points / Match
League Average: 169
12.5
( High )
Volatility
League Average: 12.2
🟢 Green = favorable situation (high pace, strong over trend, or very stable totals) ✅ ·
⚪ Gray = neutral, close to league average 👌 ·
🟡 Yellow / 🟠 Orange = warning, results can swing more than usual ⚠️ ·
🔴 Red = unfavorable / high risk (low pace for overs, strong under lean, or very volatile games) ❌
Head to Head Statistics
Limburg vs Kortrijk
All Time
Last 3 Games
50%
Over 159.5
2 / 4
25%
Over 169.5
1 / 4
25%
Over 179.5
1 / 4
🟢 Green = value ✅ ·
🟡 Yellow = risky ⚠️ ·
🔴 Red = skip ❌
Scoring Momentum (Recent Form)
How to use
| Metric | Limburg | Kortrijk |
|---|---|---|
| Average Total Points (Last 5 Games) | 165.00 | 168.00 |
| Previous 5 Avg | 0 | 0 |
| Trend Line (Last 5 Games) | 166, 161, 156, 174, 168 | 158, 145, 190, 191, 156 |
🟢 Green = value ✅ ·
🟡 Yellow = risky ⚠️ ·
🔴 Red = skip ❌
Team performance vs top opponents
scoring, conceding, and net rating.
How to use
| Metric | Limburg | Kortrijk |
|---|---|---|
| Avg Pts vs Top 5 Def | 81.7 | 78.7 |
| Avg Pts Conceded vs Top 5 Off | 88.0 | 81.7 |
| Net Rating vs Top 5 Opps | 0.0 | 0.0 |
🟢 Green = value ✅ ·
🟡 Yellow = risky ⚠️ ·
🔴 Red = skip ❌ —
Values are compared to the team's own season average.
These indicators reflect performance against top opponents (TOP 5 offenses and defenses) and help assess true team strength.
Recent momentum
last 5 vs previous 5 games.
How to use
Limburg
Kortrijk
| Period | Avg Points Scored | Avg Points Conceded | Net Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last 5 | 85.6 | 79.4 | +6.2 |
| Period | Avg Points Scored | Avg Points Conceded | Net Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last 5 | 92.8 | 75.2 | +17.6 |
🟢 Green = improving form 📈 ·
🟡 Yellow = neutral ➖ ·
🔴 Red = declining form 📉 —
Momentum analysis shows whether the team has recently been improving in offense and defense, or on the contrary – losing stability.
| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall |
L
L
W
L
W
|
85.89 |
| Home |
L
W
W
W
L
|
86.40 |
| Away |
L
L
W
L
|
85.25 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 44.4% | 60.0% | 25.0% |
| Total Points Avg | 165.45 | 162.6 | 169 |
| Scored | 85.89 | 86.40 | 85.25 |
| Conceded | 79.56 | 76.20 | 83.75 |
| Pace Avg | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Off. Rating | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Def. Rating | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ATS Cover % | 0% | 0% | 0% |
* Pace is not a value indicator but shows game tempo — higher numbers mean faster play and more possessions.
| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall |
W
W
W
L
W
|
86.44 |
| Home |
W
W
W
L
W
|
84.00 |
| Away |
W
L
L
L
|
89.50 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 55.6% | 80.0% | 25.0% |
| Total Points Avg | 168.11 | 156.2 | 183 |
| Scored | 86.44 | 84.00 | 89.50 |
| Conceded | 81.67 | 72.20 | 93.50 |
| Pace Avg | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Off. Rating | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Def. Rating | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ATS Cover % | 0% | 0% | 0% |
* Pace is not a value indicator but shows game tempo — higher numbers mean faster play and more possessions.
Scoring consistency tracker
Last 10 games & full season
How to use
Last 3
Last 5 ⚠️
Last 10 ⚠️
Season
Kortrijk is +8% better in terms of Points Scored
Full-Time
Quarters
| Scored Per Game | Limburg | Kortrijk |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 67% | 67% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 33% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 33% | 0% |
🟢 Green = potential value signal · 🟡 Yellow = needs confirmation · 🔴 Red = caution. Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Kortrijk is +4% better in terms of Points Scored
Full-Time
Quarters
| Scored Per Game | Limburg | Kortrijk |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 40% | 50% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 40% | 25% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 20% | 25% |
🟢 Green = potential value signal · 🟡 Yellow = needs confirmation · 🔴 Red = caution. Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Kortrijk is +4% better in terms of Points Scored
Full-Time
Quarters
| Scored Per Game | Limburg | Kortrijk |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 40% | 50% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 40% | 25% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 20% | 25% |
🟢 Green = potential value signal · 🟡 Yellow = needs confirmation · 🔴 Red = caution. Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Kortrijk is +4% better in terms of Points Scored
Full-Time
Quarters
| Scored Per Game | Limburg | Kortrijk |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 40% | 50% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 40% | 25% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 20% | 25% |
🟢 Green = potential value signal · 🟡 Yellow = needs confirmation · 🔴 Red = caution. Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Offensive Efficiency & Shooting Profile
Where Teams Gain or Lose Value
🟢 Green = strong efficiency or shooting edge · 🟡 Yellow = balanced/average · 🔴 Red = weakness, needs caution. Some stats (like 3P Rate and FT Rate) indicate playing style, not necessarily good or bad — interpret in context.
Possession Control & Rebounding
Assists. Turnovers. Pace
Defensive Consistency vs Season Average
Last 10 & season games
How to use
Last 3
Last 5 ⚠️
Last 10 ⚠️
Season
Limburg is +21% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
Full-Time
Quarters
| Conceded Per Game | Limburg | Kortrijk |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 0% | 67% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 33% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 100% | 0% |
🟢 Green = strong defensive hold (unders-friendly) · 🟡 Yellow = neutral · 🔴 Red = weak defense (overs risk). Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Limburg is +19% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
Full-Time
Quarters
| Conceded Per Game | Limburg | Kortrijk |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 0% | 75% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 20% | 25% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 80% | 0% |
🟢 Green = strong defensive hold (unders-friendly) · 🟡 Yellow = neutral · 🔴 Red = weak defense (overs risk). Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Limburg is +19% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
Full-Time
Quarters
| Conceded Per Game | Limburg | Kortrijk |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 0% | 75% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 20% | 25% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 80% | 0% |
🟢 Green = strong defensive hold (unders-friendly) · 🟡 Yellow = neutral · 🔴 Red = weak defense (overs risk). Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Limburg is +19% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
Full-Time
Quarters
| Conceded Per Game | Limburg | Kortrijk |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 0% | 75% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 20% | 25% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 80% | 0% |
🟢 Green = strong defensive hold (unders-friendly) · 🟡 Yellow = neutral · 🔴 Red = weak defense (overs risk). Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Defensive Matchup
Edge Style vs Style
🟢 Green = Clear defensive edge (profitable trend) · 🟡 Yellow = Neutral (no big edge) · 🔴 Red = Weak defense / exploitable
Defensive Pressure & Disruption
Who Forces Mistakes?
🟢 Green = Strong edge · 🟡 Yellow = Average · 🔴 Red = Weak edge
* Rate = per 100 possessions. · Others = per game averages.
Total Points Hit-Rate
Scoring trends 10 & seasone games
Last 3
Last 5 ⚠️
Last 10 ⚠️
Season
Over X Points
Under X Points
| Match Points | Limburg | Kortrijk | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 150.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Over 160.5 | 60% | 100% | 78% |
| Over 170.5 | 0% | 75% | 33% |
| Over 180.5 | 0% | 75% | 33% |
| Over 190.5 | 0% | 25% | 11% |
| Over 200.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Limburg | Kortrijk | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 150.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Under 160.5 | 40% | 0% | 22% |
| Under 170.5 | 100% | 25% | 67% |
| Under 180.5 | 100% | 25% | 67% |
| Under 190.5 | 100% | 75% | 89% |
| Under 200.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
🟢 Green = Strong over-trend· 🟡 Yellow = Balanced · 🔴 Red = Weak over-trend
Over X Points
Under X Points
| Match Points | Limburg | Kortrijk | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 150.5 | 67% | 67% | 67% |
| Over 160.5 | 33% | 67% | 50% |
| Over 170.5 | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| Over 180.5 | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| Over 190.5 | 0% | 33% | 17% |
| Over 200.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Limburg | Kortrijk | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 150.5 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| Under 160.5 | 67% | 33% | 50% |
| Under 170.5 | 100% | 33% | 67% |
| Under 180.5 | 100% | 33% | 67% |
| Under 190.5 | 100% | 67% | 83% |
| Under 200.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
🟢 Green = Strong over-trend· 🟡 Yellow = Balanced · 🔴 Red = Weak over-trend
Over X Points
Under X Points
| Match Points | Limburg | Kortrijk | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 150.5 | 80% | 100% | 89% |
| Over 160.5 | 40% | 100% | 67% |
| Over 170.5 | 0% | 75% | 33% |
| Over 180.5 | 0% | 75% | 33% |
| Over 190.5 | 0% | 25% | 11% |
| Over 200.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Limburg | Kortrijk | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 150.5 | 20% | 0% | 11% |
| Under 160.5 | 60% | 0% | 33% |
| Under 170.5 | 100% | 25% | 67% |
| Under 180.5 | 100% | 25% | 67% |
| Under 190.5 | 100% | 75% | 89% |
| Under 200.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
🟢 Green = Strong over-trend· 🟡 Yellow = Balanced · 🔴 Red = Weak over-trend
Over X Points
Under X Points
| Match Points | Limburg | Kortrijk | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 150.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Over 160.5 | 60% | 100% | 78% |
| Over 170.5 | 0% | 75% | 33% |
| Over 180.5 | 0% | 75% | 33% |
| Over 190.5 | 0% | 25% | 11% |
| Over 200.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Limburg | Kortrijk | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 150.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Under 160.5 | 40% | 0% | 22% |
| Under 170.5 | 100% | 25% | 67% |
| Under 180.5 | 100% | 25% | 67% |
| Under 190.5 | 100% | 75% | 89% |
| Under 200.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
🟢 Green = Strong over-trend· 🟡 Yellow = Balanced · 🔴 Red = Weak over-trend
| # | Team | W | L | PCT | PPG | OPP PPG | DIFF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Port of Antwerp Giants | 8 | 1 | 0.889 | 97.7 | 76.0 | - |
| 2 | Telindus Oostende | 8 | 1 | 0.889 | 90.8 | 80.2 | - |
| 3 | Kangoeroes Mechelen | 7 | 1 | 0.875 | 83.3 | 74.1 | - |
| 4 | Leeuwarden | 7 | 2 | 0.778 | 92.3 | 77.9 | - |
| 5 | GasTerra Flames Groningen | 6 | 3 | 0.667 | 81.9 | 78.6 | - |
| 6 | Generali Okapi Aalstar | 6 | 3 | 0.667 | 94.4 | 88.2 | - |
| 7 | Royal Atomia Brussels | 6 | 3 | 0.667 | 87.0 | 83.6 | - |
| 8 | Eiffeltowers Den Bosch | 5 | 3 | 0.625 | 86.3 | 80.4 | - |
| 9 | Kortrijk | 5 | 4 | 0.556 | 86.4 | 81.7 | - |
| 10 | Limburg | 4 | 5 | 0.444 | 85.9 | 79.6 | - |
| 11 | Belfius Mons | 4 | 5 | 0.444 | 91.0 | 94.1 | - |
| 12 | Spirou Charleroi | 4 | 5 | 0.444 | 82.3 | 90.6 | - |
| 13 | Stella Artois Leuven Bears | 3 | 6 | 0.333 | 79.3 | 84.4 | - |
| 14 | Zwolle | 3 | 6 | 0.333 | 79.3 | 82.0 | - |
| 15 | LWD Basketball | 2 | 7 | 0.222 | 89.0 | 100.0 | - |
| 16 | Den Helder | 1 | 8 | 0.111 | 79.9 | 89.8 | - |
| 17 | Feyenoord Basketbal Rotterdam | 1 | 8 | 0.111 | 78.2 | 96.8 | - |
| 18 | Weert | 0 | 9 | 0.000 | 64.3 | 89.9 | - |