Scoring Intelligence Panel
Ratiopharm Ulm vs JL Bourg-en-Bresse
Head to Head Statistics
Ratiopharm Ulm vs JL Bourg-en-Bresse
Scoring Momentum (Recent Form)
| Metric | Ratiopharm Ulm | JL Bourg-en-Bresse |
|---|---|---|
| Average Total Points (Last 5 Games) | 186.20 | 153.00 |
| Previous 5 Avg | 0 | 0 |
| Trend Line (Last 5 Games) | 173, 167, 200, 192, 199 | 167, 150, 158, 122, 168 |
Team performance vs top opponents
scoring, conceding, and net rating.
| Metric | Ratiopharm Ulm | JL Bourg-en-Bresse |
|---|---|---|
| Avg Pts vs Top 5 Def | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Avg Pts Conceded vs Top 5 Off | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Net Rating vs Top 5 Opps | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Recent momentum
last 5 vs previous 5 games.
| Period | Avg Points Scored | Avg Points Conceded | Net Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last 5 | 79.8 | 94.6 | -14.8 |
| Period | Avg Points Scored | Avg Points Conceded | Net Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last 5 | 81.2 | 73.8 | +7.4 |
Ratiopharm Ulm
EuroCup Basketball
League Pos.
0 / 20
| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall |
W
L
L
W
W
|
93.50 |
| Home |
W
L
W
|
96.33 |
| Away |
L
W
W
|
90.67 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 66.7% | 66.7% | 66.7% |
| Total Points Avg | 186.67 | 190.66 | 182.67 |
| Scored | 93.50 | 96.33 | 90.67 |
| Conceded | 93.17 | 94.33 | 92.00 |
| Pace Avg | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Off. Rating | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Def. Rating | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ATS Cover % | 0% | 0% | 0% |
JL Bourg-en-Bresse
EuroCup Basketball
League Pos.
0 / 20
| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall |
W
L
W
W
W
|
78.50 |
| Home |
W
W
W
|
88.67 |
| Away |
L
W
W
|
68.33 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 83.3% | 100.0% | 66.7% |
| Total Points Avg | 148.67 | 164.34 | 133 |
| Scored | 78.50 | 88.67 | 68.33 |
| Conceded | 70.17 | 75.67 | 64.67 |
| Pace Avg | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Off. Rating | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Def. Rating | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ATS Cover % | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Scoring consistency tracker
Last 10 games & full season
Ratiopharm Ulm is +41% better in terms of Points Scored
| Scored Per Game | Ratiopharm Ulm | JL Bourg-en-Bresse |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 67% | 0% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 33% | 0% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 0% | 100% |
Ratiopharm Ulm is +41% better in terms of Points Scored
| Scored Per Game | Ratiopharm Ulm | JL Bourg-en-Bresse |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 67% | 0% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 33% | 0% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 0% | 100% |
Ratiopharm Ulm is +41% better in terms of Points Scored
| Scored Per Game | Ratiopharm Ulm | JL Bourg-en-Bresse |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 67% | 0% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 33% | 0% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 0% | 100% |
Ratiopharm Ulm is +41% better in terms of Points Scored
| Scored Per Game | Ratiopharm Ulm | JL Bourg-en-Bresse |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 67% | 0% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 33% | 0% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 0% | 100% |
Offensive Efficiency & Shooting Profile
Where Teams Gain or Lose Value
Possession Control & Rebounding
Assists. Turnovers. Pace
Defensive Consistency vs Season Average
Last 10 & season games
JL Bourg-en-Bresse is +31% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
| Conceded Per Game | Ratiopharm Ulm | JL Bourg-en-Bresse |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 67% | 33% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 33% | 0% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 0% | 67% |
JL Bourg-en-Bresse is +31% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
| Conceded Per Game | Ratiopharm Ulm | JL Bourg-en-Bresse |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 67% | 33% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 33% | 0% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 0% | 67% |
JL Bourg-en-Bresse is +31% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
| Conceded Per Game | Ratiopharm Ulm | JL Bourg-en-Bresse |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 67% | 33% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 33% | 0% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 0% | 67% |
JL Bourg-en-Bresse is +31% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
| Conceded Per Game | Ratiopharm Ulm | JL Bourg-en-Bresse |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 67% | 33% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 33% | 0% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 0% | 67% |
Defensive Matchup
Edge Style vs Style
Defensive Pressure & Disruption
Who Forces Mistakes?
Total Points Hit-Rate
Scoring trends 10 & seasone games
| Match Points | Ratiopharm Ulm | JL Bourg-en-Bresse | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 120.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Over 130.5 | 100% | 33% | 67% |
| Over 140.5 | 100% | 33% | 67% |
| Over 150.5 | 100% | 0% | 50% |
| Over 160.5 | 100% | 0% | 50% |
| Over 170.5 | 100% | 0% | 50% |
| Over 180.5 | 67% | 0% | 33% |
| Over 190.5 | 67% | 0% | 33% |
| Over 200.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Ratiopharm Ulm | JL Bourg-en-Bresse | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 120.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Under 130.5 | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| Under 140.5 | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| Under 150.5 | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| Under 160.5 | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| Under 170.5 | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| Under 180.5 | 33% | 100% | 67% |
| Under 190.5 | 33% | 100% | 67% |
| Under 200.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Match Points | Ratiopharm Ulm | JL Bourg-en-Bresse | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 120.5 | 67% | 67% | 67% |
| Over 130.5 | 67% | 33% | 50% |
| Over 140.5 | 67% | 33% | 50% |
| Over 150.5 | 67% | 0% | 33% |
| Over 160.5 | 67% | 0% | 33% |
| Over 170.5 | 67% | 0% | 33% |
| Over 180.5 | 33% | 0% | 17% |
| Over 190.5 | 33% | 0% | 17% |
| Over 200.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Ratiopharm Ulm | JL Bourg-en-Bresse | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 120.5 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| Under 130.5 | 33% | 67% | 50% |
| Under 140.5 | 33% | 67% | 50% |
| Under 150.5 | 33% | 100% | 67% |
| Under 160.5 | 33% | 100% | 67% |
| Under 170.5 | 33% | 100% | 67% |
| Under 180.5 | 67% | 100% | 83% |
| Under 190.5 | 67% | 100% | 83% |
| Under 200.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Match Points | Ratiopharm Ulm | JL Bourg-en-Bresse | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 120.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Over 130.5 | 100% | 33% | 67% |
| Over 140.5 | 100% | 33% | 67% |
| Over 150.5 | 100% | 0% | 50% |
| Over 160.5 | 100% | 0% | 50% |
| Over 170.5 | 100% | 0% | 50% |
| Over 180.5 | 67% | 0% | 33% |
| Over 190.5 | 67% | 0% | 33% |
| Over 200.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Ratiopharm Ulm | JL Bourg-en-Bresse | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 120.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Under 130.5 | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| Under 140.5 | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| Under 150.5 | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| Under 160.5 | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| Under 170.5 | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| Under 180.5 | 33% | 100% | 67% |
| Under 190.5 | 33% | 100% | 67% |
| Under 200.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Match Points | Ratiopharm Ulm | JL Bourg-en-Bresse | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 120.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Over 130.5 | 100% | 33% | 67% |
| Over 140.5 | 100% | 33% | 67% |
| Over 150.5 | 100% | 0% | 50% |
| Over 160.5 | 100% | 0% | 50% |
| Over 170.5 | 100% | 0% | 50% |
| Over 180.5 | 67% | 0% | 33% |
| Over 190.5 | 67% | 0% | 33% |
| Over 200.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Ratiopharm Ulm | JL Bourg-en-Bresse | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 120.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Under 130.5 | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| Under 140.5 | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| Under 150.5 | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| Under 160.5 | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| Under 170.5 | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| Under 180.5 | 33% | 100% | 67% |
| Under 190.5 | 33% | 100% | 67% |
| Under 200.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Ratiopharm Ulm -
Player Projections
Small sample for some players
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Tobias Jensen | |||||||||||||
| Nelson Weidemann | |||||||||||||
| Alec Anigbata | |||||||||||||
| Len Schoormann | |||||||||||||
| Malik Osborne | |||||||||||||
| Endurance Aiyamenkhue | |||||||||||||
| Meissa Faye | |||||||||||||
| Teo Milicic | |||||||||||||
| Namori Omog | |||||||||||||
| Christopher Ledlum | |||||||||||||
| Joel Cwik | |||||||||||||
| Lenni Kunzewitsch | |||||||||||||
| Christian Sengfelder | |||||||||||||
| Diego Garavaglia | |||||||||||||
| Mohamed Diakite | |||||||||||||
| Mark Smith | |||||||||||||
| Bryce Brown | |||||||||||||
| Thomas Klepeisz |
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Tobias Jensen | |||||||||||||
| Nelson Weidemann | |||||||||||||
| Alec Anigbata | |||||||||||||
| Len Schoormann | |||||||||||||
| Malik Osborne | |||||||||||||
| Endurance Aiyamenkhue | |||||||||||||
| Meissa Faye | |||||||||||||
| Teo Milicic | |||||||||||||
| Namori Omog | |||||||||||||
| Christopher Ledlum | |||||||||||||
| Joel Cwik | |||||||||||||
| Lenni Kunzewitsch | |||||||||||||
| Christian Sengfelder | |||||||||||||
| Diego Garavaglia | |||||||||||||
| Mohamed Diakite | |||||||||||||
| Mark Smith | |||||||||||||
| Bryce Brown | |||||||||||||
| Thomas Klepeisz |
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Tobias Jensen | |||||||||||||
| Nelson Weidemann | |||||||||||||
| Alec Anigbata | |||||||||||||
| Len Schoormann | |||||||||||||
| Malik Osborne | |||||||||||||
| Endurance Aiyamenkhue | |||||||||||||
| Meissa Faye | |||||||||||||
| Teo Milicic | |||||||||||||
| Namori Omog | |||||||||||||
| Christopher Ledlum | |||||||||||||
| Joel Cwik | |||||||||||||
| Lenni Kunzewitsch | |||||||||||||
| Christian Sengfelder | |||||||||||||
| Diego Garavaglia | |||||||||||||
| Mohamed Diakite | |||||||||||||
| Mark Smith | |||||||||||||
| Bryce Brown | |||||||||||||
| Thomas Klepeisz |
JL Bourg-en-Bresse -
Player Projections
Small sample for some players
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Kevin Kokila | |||||||||||||
| Antony Labanca | |||||||||||||
| Yvann Mbaya |
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Kevin Kokila | |||||||||||||
| Antony Labanca | |||||||||||||
| Yvann Mbaya |
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Kevin Kokila | |||||||||||||
| Antony Labanca | |||||||||||||
| Yvann Mbaya |
Roasters & Injured Players
| # | Team | W | L | PCT | PPG | OPP PPG | DIFF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KK Cedevita Olimpija | 6 | 2 | 0.750 | 87.6 | 77.9 | 9.8 |
| 2 | Hapoel Jerusalem | 6 | 2 | 0.750 | 96.0 | 86.8 | 9.3 |
| 3 | Bahcesehir Koleji | 6 | 2 | 0.750 | 91.1 | 82.1 | 9.0 |
| 4 | U-Mobitelco BT Cluj Napoca | 4 | 4 | 0.500 | 95.0 | 92.4 | 2.6 |
| 5 | Reyer Venezia | 4 | 4 | 0.500 | 86.1 | 83.6 | 2.5 |
| 6 | Slask Wroclaw | 4 | 4 | 0.500 | 85.1 | 87.4 | -2.3 |
| 7 | Aris Tt Bank | 4 | 4 | 0.500 | 81.4 | 84.6 | -3.3 |
| 8 | Neptunas Klaipeda | 3 | 5 | 0.375 | 90.9 | 95.0 | -4.1 |
| 9 | La Bruixa d'Or Manresa | 3 | 5 | 0.375 | 82.9 | 87.4 | -4.5 |
| 10 | Hamburg | 0 | 8 | 0.000 | 77.4 | 96.4 | -19.0 |
| # | Team | W | L | PCT | PPG | OPP PPG | DIFF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JL Bourg-en-Bresse | 7 | 1 | 0.875 | 79.9 | 69.1 | 10.8 |
| 2 | KK Buducnost | 6 | 2 | 0.750 | 88.8 | 77.5 | 11.3 |
| 3 | Besiktas Fibabanka | 6 | 2 | 0.750 | 91.4 | 81.8 | 9.6 |
| 4 | Turk Telekom | 5 | 3 | 0.625 | 87.5 | 78.4 | 9.1 |
| 5 | Ratiopharm Ulm | 4 | 4 | 0.500 | 87.0 | 94.5 | -7.5 |
| 6 | Chemcats Chemnitz | 3 | 5 | 0.375 | 83.1 | 80.8 | 2.4 |
| 7 | London Lions | 3 | 5 | 0.375 | 76.9 | 80.4 | -3.5 |
| 8 | Aquila Basket Trento | 3 | 5 | 0.375 | 79.0 | 88.1 | -9.1 |
| 9 | Lietkabelis | 2 | 6 | 0.250 | 78.6 | 88.0 | -9.4 |
| 10 | Panionios OnTelecoms | 1 | 7 | 0.125 | 73.8 | 87.4 | -13.6 |