County Flag China / China Basketball Association Summer League
China Basketball Association Summer League
Teams: 13
Matches: 45 / 47 Played
Progress:
96% completed

Home Away Stats

Home (62%)
28 Wins
17 Wins
Away (38%)

League Trends & Metrics

How to use
Metrics Value
Avg Pace 7.68
Avg Offensive Rating 35.18
Avg Defensive Rating 32.73
ATS Cover % (Home) 60
ATS Cover % (Away) 12.5
Avg Total Points (Last 10 Games) 158.8
Season Avg Total Points 154.23
Recent League Trends (Last 10 Games) 3% (Up)

Over / Under Points

Last 10 / Season avg.
Season / Season avg.
Over X Points
Under X Points
Match Points Percentage
Over 100.5 100%
Over 110.5 98%
Over 120.5 98%
Over 130.5 84%
Over 140.5 71%
Over 150.5 58%
Over 160.5 33%
Over 170.5 13%
Over 180.5 2%
Over 190.5 0%
Match Points Percentage
Under 100.5 0%
Under 110.5 2%
Under 120.5 2%
Under 130.5 16%
Under 140.5 29%
Under 150.5 42%
Under 160.5 67%
Under 170.5 87%
Under 180.5 98%
Under 190.5 100%
Over X Points
Under X Points
Match Points Percentage
Over 100.5 100%
Over 110.5 90%
Over 120.5 90%
Over 130.5 70%
Over 140.5 50%
Over 150.5 40%
Over 160.5 10%
Over 170.5 10%
Over 180.5 10%
Over 190.5 0%
Match Points Percentage
Under 100.5 0%
Under 110.5 10%
Under 120.5 10%
Under 130.5 30%
Under 140.5 50%
Under 150.5 60%
Under 160.5 90%
Under 170.5 90%
Under 180.5 90%
Under 190.5 100%

Points Per Quarter

How many pointes are scored in this league?
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Match Points Percentage
Over 20.5 100%
Over 25.5 98%
Over 30.5 82%
Over 35.5 71%
Over 40.5 40%
Over 45.5 11%
Over 50.5 4%
Over 55.5 2%
Over 60.5 0%
Match Points Percentage
Over 15.5 100%
Over 20.5 98%
Over 25.5 98%
Over 30.5 89%
Over 35.5 69%
Over 40.5 38%
Over 45.5 11%
Over 50.5 0%
Match Points Percentage
Over 20.5 100%
Over 25.5 91%
Over 30.5 80%
Over 35.5 58%
Over 40.5 27%
Over 45.5 16%
Over 50.5 4%
Over 55.5 2%
Over 60.5 0%
Match Points Percentage
Over 20.5 100%
Over 25.5 98%
Over 30.5 78%
Over 35.5 53%
Over 40.5 24%
Over 45.5 13%
Over 50.5 0%
# Team W L PCT PPG OPP PPG DIFF
1 Guangzhou Langtai Haiben 2 1 0.670 75.7 65.7 10.0
2 Nanjing Toupaisujiu 2 1 0.670 73.3 68.0 5.3
3 Jiutai Rural Commercial Bank 2 1 0.670 81.0 81.3 -0.3
4 Ningbo Dingwo 0 3 0.000 66.3 81.3 -15.0
# Team W L PCT PPG OPP PPG DIFF
1 Xinjiang Yilite 3 0 1.000 87.7 79.3 8.3
2 Guangdong East Sunshine 2 1 0.670 85.3 71.7 13.7
3 Qingdao Guoxin Pharmaceutical 1 2 0.330 82.3 85.7 -3.3
4 Beijing Konggu 0 3 0.000 64.3 83.0 -18.7
# Team W L PCT PPG OPP PPG DIFF
1 Guangdong East Sunshine 3 0 1.000 84.0 69.0 15.0
2 Xinjiang Yilite 2 1 0.670 85.7 82.0 3.7
3 Shanxi Fenjiu 1 2 0.330 77.0 86.7 -9.7
4 Qingdao Guoxin Pharmaceutical 0 3 0.000 75.3 84.3 -9.0
# Team W L PCT PPG OPP PPG DIFF
1 Qingdao Guoxin Pharmaceutical 0 0 0.000 0.0 0.0 0.0
2 Xinjiang Yilite 0 0 0.000 0.0 0.0 0.0
3 Jiangsu Kendiya 0 0 0.000 0.0 0.0 0.0
4 Beijing Konggu 0 0 0.000 0.0 0.0 0.0
5 Shanxi Fenjiu 0 0 0.000 0.0 0.0 0.0
6 Tianjin Pioneers 0 0 0.000 0.0 0.0 0.0
7 Shandong Hi-Speed 0 0 0.000 0.0 0.0 0.0
8 Fujian Jinjiang Cultural Tourism 0 0 0.000 0.0 0.0 0.0
# Team W L PCT PPG OPP PPG DIFF
1 Shandong Hi-Speed 0 0 0.000 0.0 0.0 0.0
2 Shanxi Fenjiu 0 0 0.000 0.0 0.0 0.0
3 Qingdao Guoxin Pharmaceutical 0 0 0.000 0.0 0.0 0.0
4 Tianjin Pioneers 0 0 0.000 0.0 0.0 0.0