84.80
W
W
W
W
L
Hogsbo Women
Sweden
Saturday Dec 13, 2025 - 10:00 (America/New_York)
Hogsbo Women vs Malbas Malmo (W)
Stats, H2H, Live Scores & xG
78.00
L
W
L
W
L
Malbas Malmo (W)
Scoring Intelligence Panel
Hogsbo Women vs Malbas Malmo (W)
N/A
Possessions / Game
League Average: N/A
158
Points / Match
League Average: 151
23.4
( High )
Volatility
League Average: 10.1
🟢 Green = favorable situation (high pace, strong over trend, or very stable totals) ✅ ·
⚪ Gray = neutral, close to league average 👌 ·
🟡 Yellow / 🟠 Orange = warning, results can swing more than usual ⚠️ ·
🔴 Red = unfavorable / high risk (low pace for overs, strong under lean, or very volatile games) ❌
Scoring Momentum (Recent Form)
| Metric | Hogsbo Women | Malbas Malmo (W) |
|---|---|---|
| Average Total Points (Last 5 Games) | 149.60 | 164.40 |
| Previous 5 Avg | 160.20 | 153.60 |
| Trend Line (Last 5 Games) | 178, 131, 114, 175, 150 | 203, 160, 136, 154, 169 |
🟢 Green = value ✅ ·
🟡 Yellow = risky ⚠️ ·
🔴 Red = skip ❌
Team performance vs top opponents
scoring, conceding, and net rating.
| Metric | Hogsbo Women | Malbas Malmo (W) |
|---|---|---|
| Avg Pts vs Top 5 Def | 80.8 | 79.5 |
| Avg Pts Conceded vs Top 5 Off | 86.3 | 83.8 |
| Net Rating vs Top 5 Opps | 0.0 | 0.0 |
🟢 Green = value ✅ ·
🟡 Yellow = risky ⚠️ ·
🔴 Red = skip ❌ —
Values are compared to the team's own season average.
These indicators reflect performance against top opponents (TOP 5 offenses and defenses) and help assess true team strength.
Recent momentum
last 5 vs previous 5 games.
Hogsbo Women
Malbas Malmo (W)
| Period | Avg Points Scored | Avg Points Conceded | Net Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last 5 | 80.0 | 69.6 | +10.4 |
| Previous 5 | 89.8 | 70.4 | +19.4 |
| Period | Avg Points Scored | Avg Points Conceded | Net Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last 5 | 83.6 | 80.8 | +2.8 |
| Previous 5 | 72.2 | 81.4 | -9.2 |
🟢 Green = improving form 📈 ·
🟡 Yellow = neutral ➖ ·
🔴 Red = declining form 📉 —
Momentum analysis shows whether the team has recently been improving in offense and defense, or on the contrary – losing stability.
Hogsbo Women
Sweden - Svenska Basketligan Dam
League Pos.
3 / 13
| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall |
W
W
W
L
L
|
85.00 |
| Home |
W
W
W
W
L
|
84.80 |
| Away |
L
L
W
W
W
|
85.17 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 63.6% | 80.0% | 50.0% |
| Total Points Avg | 156.91 | 153 | 160.17 |
| Scored | 85.00 | 84.80 | 85.17 |
| Conceded | 71.91 | 68.20 | 75.00 |
| Pace Avg | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Off. Rating | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Def. Rating | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ATS Cover % | 0% | 0% | 0% |
* Pace is not a value indicator but shows game tempo — higher numbers mean faster play and more possessions.
Malbas Malmo (W)
Sweden - Svenska Basketligan Dam
League Pos.
7 / 13
| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall |
L
W
W
L
W
|
77.90 |
| Home |
W
L
W
W
L
|
77.80 |
| Away |
L
W
L
W
L
|
78.00 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 50.0% | 60.0% | 40.0% |
| Total Points Avg | 159 | 156.6 | 161.4 |
| Scored | 77.90 | 77.80 | 78.00 |
| Conceded | 81.10 | 78.80 | 83.40 |
| Pace Avg | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Off. Rating | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Def. Rating | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ATS Cover % | 0% | 0% | 0% |
* Pace is not a value indicator but shows game tempo — higher numbers mean faster play and more possessions.
Scoring consistency tracker
Last 10 games & full season
Last 3
Last 5
Last 10 ⚠️
Season
Malbas Malmo (W) is +2% better in terms of Points Scored
Hogsbo Women at Home
Full-Time
Quarters
| Scored Per Game | Hogsbo Women | Malbas Malmo (W) |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 67% | 33% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 33% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 33% | 33% |
🟢 Green = potential value signal · 🟡 Yellow = needs confirmation · 🔴 Red = caution. Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Hogsbo Women is +9% better in terms of Points Scored
Hogsbo Women at Home
Full-Time
Quarters
| Scored Per Game | Hogsbo Women | Malbas Malmo (W) |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 60% | 40% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 20% | 20% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 20% | 40% |
🟢 Green = potential value signal · 🟡 Yellow = needs confirmation · 🔴 Red = caution. Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Hogsbo Women is +9% better in terms of Points Scored
Hogsbo Women at Home
Full-Time
Quarters
| Scored Per Game | Hogsbo Women | Malbas Malmo (W) |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 60% | 40% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 20% | 20% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 20% | 40% |
🟢 Green = potential value signal · 🟡 Yellow = needs confirmation · 🔴 Red = caution. Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Hogsbo Women is +9% better in terms of Points Scored
Hogsbo Women at Home
Full-Time
Quarters
| Scored Per Game | Hogsbo Women | Malbas Malmo (W) |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 60% | 40% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 20% | 20% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 20% | 40% |
🟢 Green = potential value signal · 🟡 Yellow = needs confirmation · 🔴 Red = caution. Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Offensive Efficiency & Shooting Profile
Where Teams Gain or Lose Value
🟢 Green = strong efficiency or shooting edge · 🟡 Yellow = balanced/average · 🔴 Red = weakness, needs caution. Some stats (like 3P Rate and FT Rate) indicate playing style, not necessarily good or bad — interpret in context.
Possession Control & Rebounding
Assists. Turnovers. Pace
Defensive Consistency vs Season Average
Last 10 & season games
Last 3
Last 5
Last 10 ⚠️
Season
Hogsbo Women is +27% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
Hogsbo Women at Home
Full-Time
Quarters
| Conceded Per Game | Hogsbo Women | Malbas Malmo (W) |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 33% | 67% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 0% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 67% | 33% |
🟢 Green = strong defensive hold (unders-friendly) · 🟡 Yellow = neutral · 🔴 Red = weak defense (overs risk). Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Hogsbo Women is +18% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
Hogsbo Women at Home
Full-Time
Quarters
| Conceded Per Game | Hogsbo Women | Malbas Malmo (W) |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 40% | 80% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 0% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 60% | 20% |
🟢 Green = strong defensive hold (unders-friendly) · 🟡 Yellow = neutral · 🔴 Red = weak defense (overs risk). Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Hogsbo Women is +18% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
Hogsbo Women at Home
Full-Time
Quarters
| Conceded Per Game | Hogsbo Women | Malbas Malmo (W) |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 40% | 80% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 0% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 60% | 20% |
🟢 Green = strong defensive hold (unders-friendly) · 🟡 Yellow = neutral · 🔴 Red = weak defense (overs risk). Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Hogsbo Women is +18% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
Hogsbo Women at Home
Full-Time
Quarters
| Conceded Per Game | Hogsbo Women | Malbas Malmo (W) |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 40% | 80% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 0% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 60% | 20% |
🟢 Green = strong defensive hold (unders-friendly) · 🟡 Yellow = neutral · 🔴 Red = weak defense (overs risk). Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Defensive Matchup
Edge Style vs Style
🟢 Green = Clear defensive edge (profitable trend) · 🟡 Yellow = Neutral (no big edge) · 🔴 Red = Weak defense / exploitable
Defensive Pressure & Disruption
Who Forces Mistakes?
🟢 Green = Strong edge · 🟡 Yellow = Average · 🔴 Red = Weak edge
* Rate = per 100 possessions. · Others = per game averages.
Total Points Hit-Rate
Scoring trends 10 & seasone games
Last 3
Last 5
Last 10 ⚠️
Season
Over X Points
Under X Points
| Match Points | Hogsbo Women | Malbas Malmo (W) | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 110.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Over 120.5 | 80% | 100% | 90% |
| Over 130.5 | 80% | 100% | 90% |
| Over 140.5 | 60% | 80% | 70% |
| Over 150.5 | 60% | 60% | 60% |
| Over 160.5 | 60% | 40% | 50% |
| Over 170.5 | 40% | 20% | 30% |
| Over 180.5 | 0% | 20% | 10% |
| Over 190.5 | 0% | 20% | 10% |
| Over 200.5 | 0% | 20% | 10% |
| Over 210.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Hogsbo Women | Malbas Malmo (W) | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 110.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Under 120.5 | 20% | 0% | 10% |
| Under 130.5 | 20% | 0% | 10% |
| Under 140.5 | 40% | 20% | 30% |
| Under 150.5 | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| Under 160.5 | 40% | 60% | 50% |
| Under 170.5 | 60% | 80% | 70% |
| Under 180.5 | 100% | 80% | 90% |
| Under 190.5 | 100% | 80% | 90% |
| Under 200.5 | 100% | 80% | 90% |
| Under 210.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
🟢 Green = Strong over-trend· 🟡 Yellow = Balanced · 🔴 Red = Weak over-trend
Over X Points
Under X Points
| Match Points | Hogsbo Women | Malbas Malmo (W) | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 130.5 | 67% | 67% | 67% |
| Over 140.5 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| Over 150.5 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| Over 160.5 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| Over 170.5 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| Over 180.5 | 0% | 33% | 17% |
| Over 190.5 | 0% | 33% | 17% |
| Over 200.5 | 0% | 33% | 17% |
| Over 210.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Hogsbo Women | Malbas Malmo (W) | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 130.5 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| Under 140.5 | 67% | 67% | 67% |
| Under 150.5 | 67% | 67% | 67% |
| Under 160.5 | 67% | 67% | 67% |
| Under 170.5 | 67% | 67% | 67% |
| Under 180.5 | 100% | 67% | 83% |
| Under 190.5 | 100% | 67% | 83% |
| Under 200.5 | 100% | 67% | 83% |
| Under 210.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
🟢 Green = Strong over-trend· 🟡 Yellow = Balanced · 🔴 Red = Weak over-trend
Over X Points
Under X Points
| Match Points | Hogsbo Women | Malbas Malmo (W) | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 110.5 | 80% | 80% | 80% |
| Over 120.5 | 60% | 80% | 70% |
| Over 130.5 | 60% | 80% | 70% |
| Over 140.5 | 40% | 60% | 50% |
| Over 150.5 | 40% | 60% | 50% |
| Over 160.5 | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| Over 170.5 | 20% | 20% | 20% |
| Over 180.5 | 0% | 20% | 10% |
| Over 190.5 | 0% | 20% | 10% |
| Over 200.5 | 0% | 20% | 10% |
| Over 210.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Hogsbo Women | Malbas Malmo (W) | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 110.5 | 20% | 20% | 20% |
| Under 120.5 | 40% | 20% | 30% |
| Under 130.5 | 40% | 20% | 30% |
| Under 140.5 | 60% | 40% | 50% |
| Under 150.5 | 60% | 40% | 50% |
| Under 160.5 | 60% | 60% | 60% |
| Under 170.5 | 80% | 80% | 80% |
| Under 180.5 | 100% | 80% | 90% |
| Under 190.5 | 100% | 80% | 90% |
| Under 200.5 | 100% | 80% | 90% |
| Under 210.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
🟢 Green = Strong over-trend· 🟡 Yellow = Balanced · 🔴 Red = Weak over-trend
Over X Points
Under X Points
| Match Points | Hogsbo Women | Malbas Malmo (W) | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 110.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Over 120.5 | 80% | 100% | 90% |
| Over 130.5 | 80% | 100% | 90% |
| Over 140.5 | 60% | 80% | 70% |
| Over 150.5 | 60% | 60% | 60% |
| Over 160.5 | 60% | 40% | 50% |
| Over 170.5 | 40% | 20% | 30% |
| Over 180.5 | 0% | 20% | 10% |
| Over 190.5 | 0% | 20% | 10% |
| Over 200.5 | 0% | 20% | 10% |
| Over 210.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Hogsbo Women | Malbas Malmo (W) | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 110.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Under 120.5 | 20% | 0% | 10% |
| Under 130.5 | 20% | 0% | 10% |
| Under 140.5 | 40% | 20% | 30% |
| Under 150.5 | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| Under 160.5 | 40% | 60% | 50% |
| Under 170.5 | 60% | 80% | 70% |
| Under 180.5 | 100% | 80% | 90% |
| Under 190.5 | 100% | 80% | 90% |
| Under 200.5 | 100% | 80% | 90% |
| Under 210.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
🟢 Green = Strong over-trend· 🟡 Yellow = Balanced · 🔴 Red = Weak over-trend
| # | Team | W | L | PCT | PPG | OPP PPG | DIFF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Uppsala Basket Women | 10 | 1 | 0.909 | 83.2 | 71.4 | - |
| 2 | Lulea Women | 9 | 1 | 0.900 | 88.8 | 64.4 | - |
| 3 | Hogsbo Women | 7 | 4 | 0.636 | 85.0 | 71.9 | - |
| 4 | Norrkoping Dolphins Women | 7 | 3 | 0.700 | 83.3 | 72.0 | - |
| 5 | AIK Basket Women | 6 | 3 | 0.667 | 81.9 | 74.8 | - |
| 6 | Sodertalje Women | 5 | 5 | 0.500 | 77.8 | 67.9 | - |
| 7 | Malbas Malmo (W) | 5 | 5 | 0.500 | 77.9 | 81.1 | - |
| 8 | KFUM Ostersund Basket Women | 5 | 4 | 0.556 | 80.2 | 76.4 | - |
| 9 | Brahe Women | 4 | 6 | 0.400 | 70.3 | 70.7 | - |
| 10 | Alvik BBK Women | 3 | 5 | 0.375 | 71.1 | 73.3 | - |
| 11 | IK Eos Women | 1 | 8 | 0.111 | 71.9 | 79.3 | - |
| 12 | Visby Ladies Women | 1 | 9 | 0.100 | 60.1 | 87.8 | - |
| 13 | BG Luleå Women | 1 | 10 | 0.091 | 49.1 | 88.3 | - |
Monthly & Opponent Breakdown (How to Use)
Compares a team/player’s overall averages to their performance vs a specific opponent.
Why it’s useful:
Betting use:
Game Outcome Summary (How to Use)