Scoring Intelligence Panel
Kirchheim vs Tigers Tübingen
Head to Head Statistics
Kirchheim vs Tigers Tübingen
Scoring Momentum (Recent Form)
| Metric | Kirchheim | Tigers Tübingen |
|---|---|---|
| Average Total Points (Last 5 Games) | 161.80 | 154.80 |
| Previous 5 Avg | 0 | 0 |
| Trend Line (Last 5 Games) | 156, 161, 180, 175, 137 | 166, 166, 155, 139, 148 |
Team performance vs top opponents
scoring, conceding, and net rating.
| Metric | Kirchheim | Tigers Tübingen |
|---|---|---|
| Avg Pts vs Top 5 Def | 73.7 | 86.0 |
| Avg Pts Conceded vs Top 5 Off | 71.3 | 82.0 |
| Net Rating vs Top 5 Opps | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Recent momentum
last 5 vs previous 5 games.
| Period | Avg Points Scored | Avg Points Conceded | Net Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last 5 | 77.0 | 73.8 | +3.2 |
| Previous 5 | 74.8 | 83.6 | -8.8 |
| Period | Avg Points Scored | Avg Points Conceded | Net Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last 5 | 82.2 | 82.4 | -0.2 |
| Previous 5 | 82.0 | 77.2 | +4.8 |
Kirchheim
Germany - 2.Basketball Bundesliga ProA
League Pos.
12 / 18
| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall |
W
L
L
L
W
|
75.43 |
| Home |
L
W
L
|
74.67 |
| Away |
W
L
L
L
|
76.00 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 28.6% | 33.3% | 25.0% |
| Total Points Avg | 158.43 | 152.34 | 163 |
| Scored | 75.43 | 74.67 | 76.00 |
| Conceded | 83.00 | 77.67 | 87.00 |
| Pace Avg | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Off. Rating | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Def. Rating | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ATS Cover % | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Tigers Tübingen
Germany - 2.Basketball Bundesliga ProA
League Pos.
9 / 18
| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall |
W
W
W
W
L
|
83.43 |
| Home |
W
W
L
L
|
81.00 |
| Away |
W
W
W
|
86.67 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 71.4% | 50.0% | 100.0% |
| Total Points Avg | 161.14 | 162.5 | 159.34 |
| Scored | 83.43 | 81.00 | 86.67 |
| Conceded | 77.71 | 81.50 | 72.67 |
| Pace Avg | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Off. Rating | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Def. Rating | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ATS Cover % | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Scoring consistency tracker
Last 10 games & full season
Tigers Tübingen is +16% better in terms of Points Scored
| Scored Per Game | Kirchheim | Tigers Tübingen |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 0% | 67% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 33% | 33% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 67% | 0% |
Tigers Tübingen is +16% better in terms of Points Scored
| Scored Per Game | Kirchheim | Tigers Tübingen |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 0% | 67% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 33% | 33% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 67% | 0% |
Tigers Tübingen is +16% better in terms of Points Scored
| Scored Per Game | Kirchheim | Tigers Tübingen |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 0% | 67% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 33% | 33% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 67% | 0% |
Tigers Tübingen is +16% better in terms of Points Scored
| Scored Per Game | Kirchheim | Tigers Tübingen |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 0% | 67% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 33% | 33% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 67% | 0% |
Offensive Efficiency & Shooting Profile
Where Teams Gain or Lose Value
Possession Control & Rebounding
Assists. Turnovers. Pace
Defensive Consistency vs Season Average
Last 10 & season games
Tigers Tübingen is +6% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
| Conceded Per Game | Kirchheim | Tigers Tübingen |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 33% | 0% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 33% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 67% | 67% |
Tigers Tübingen is +6% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
| Conceded Per Game | Kirchheim | Tigers Tübingen |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 33% | 0% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 33% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 67% | 67% |
Tigers Tübingen is +6% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
| Conceded Per Game | Kirchheim | Tigers Tübingen |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 33% | 0% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 33% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 67% | 67% |
Tigers Tübingen is +6% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
| Conceded Per Game | Kirchheim | Tigers Tübingen |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 33% | 0% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 33% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 67% | 67% |
Defensive Matchup
Edge Style vs Style
Defensive Pressure & Disruption
Who Forces Mistakes?
Total Points Hit-Rate
Scoring trends 10 & seasone games
| Match Points | Kirchheim | Tigers Tübingen | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 130.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Over 140.5 | 33% | 67% | 50% |
| Over 150.5 | 33% | 67% | 50% |
| Over 160.5 | 33% | 67% | 50% |
| Over 170.5 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| Over 180.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Kirchheim | Tigers Tübingen | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 130.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Under 140.5 | 67% | 33% | 50% |
| Under 150.5 | 67% | 33% | 50% |
| Under 160.5 | 67% | 33% | 50% |
| Under 170.5 | 67% | 67% | 67% |
| Under 180.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Match Points | Kirchheim | Tigers Tübingen | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 130.5 | 67% | 67% | 67% |
| Over 140.5 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| Over 150.5 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| Over 160.5 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| Over 170.5 | 33% | 0% | 17% |
| Over 180.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Kirchheim | Tigers Tübingen | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 130.5 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| Under 140.5 | 67% | 67% | 67% |
| Under 150.5 | 67% | 67% | 67% |
| Under 160.5 | 67% | 67% | 67% |
| Under 170.5 | 67% | 100% | 83% |
| Under 180.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Match Points | Kirchheim | Tigers Tübingen | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 130.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Over 140.5 | 33% | 67% | 50% |
| Over 150.5 | 33% | 67% | 50% |
| Over 160.5 | 33% | 67% | 50% |
| Over 170.5 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| Over 180.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Kirchheim | Tigers Tübingen | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 130.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Under 140.5 | 67% | 33% | 50% |
| Under 150.5 | 67% | 33% | 50% |
| Under 160.5 | 67% | 33% | 50% |
| Under 170.5 | 67% | 67% | 67% |
| Under 180.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Match Points | Kirchheim | Tigers Tübingen | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 130.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Over 140.5 | 33% | 67% | 50% |
| Over 150.5 | 33% | 67% | 50% |
| Over 160.5 | 33% | 67% | 50% |
| Over 170.5 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| Over 180.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Kirchheim | Tigers Tübingen | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 130.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Under 140.5 | 67% | 33% | 50% |
| Under 150.5 | 67% | 33% | 50% |
| Under 160.5 | 67% | 33% | 50% |
| Under 170.5 | 67% | 67% | 67% |
| Under 180.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Tigers Tübingen -
Player Projections
Small sample for some players
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Evan Maxwell | |||||||||||||
| Gaines Frank | |||||||||||||
| Georgios Kalaitzakis | |||||||||||||
| Javon Masters | |||||||||||||
| Till-Joscha Jönke | |||||||||||||
| Gianni Otto | |||||||||||||
| Daniel Keppeler | |||||||||||||
| Timo Lanmüller | |||||||||||||
| Mateo Seric | |||||||||||||
| Zaccheus Darko-Kelly | |||||||||||||
| Bakary Dibba | |||||||||||||
| Jimmy Boeheim | |||||||||||||
| Krišs Helmanis | |||||||||||||
| Aatu Kivimaki | |||||||||||||
| Jhivvan Jackson | |||||||||||||
| Kaodirichi Akobundu Ehiogu | |||||||||||||
| Joshua Schwaibold |
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Evan Maxwell | |||||||||||||
| Gaines Frank | |||||||||||||
| Georgios Kalaitzakis | |||||||||||||
| Javon Masters | |||||||||||||
| Till-Joscha Jönke | |||||||||||||
| Gianni Otto | |||||||||||||
| Daniel Keppeler | |||||||||||||
| Timo Lanmüller | |||||||||||||
| Mateo Seric | |||||||||||||
| Zaccheus Darko-Kelly | |||||||||||||
| Bakary Dibba | |||||||||||||
| Jimmy Boeheim | |||||||||||||
| Krišs Helmanis | |||||||||||||
| Aatu Kivimaki | |||||||||||||
| Jhivvan Jackson | |||||||||||||
| Kaodirichi Akobundu Ehiogu | |||||||||||||
| Joshua Schwaibold |
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Evan Maxwell | |||||||||||||
| Gaines Frank | |||||||||||||
| Georgios Kalaitzakis | |||||||||||||
| Javon Masters | |||||||||||||
| Till-Joscha Jönke | |||||||||||||
| Gianni Otto | |||||||||||||
| Daniel Keppeler | |||||||||||||
| Timo Lanmüller | |||||||||||||
| Mateo Seric | |||||||||||||
| Zaccheus Darko-Kelly | |||||||||||||
| Bakary Dibba | |||||||||||||
| Jimmy Boeheim | |||||||||||||
| Krišs Helmanis | |||||||||||||
| Aatu Kivimaki | |||||||||||||
| Jhivvan Jackson | |||||||||||||
| Kaodirichi Akobundu Ehiogu | |||||||||||||
| Joshua Schwaibold |
Roasters & Injured Players
| # | Team | W | L | PCT | PPG | OPP PPG | DIFF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Phoenix Hagen | 9 | 1 | 0.900 | 104.4 | 84.2 | - |
| 2 | BG Gottingen | 8 | 2 | 0.800 | 92.6 | 82.0 | - |
| 3 | Eisbaren Bremerhaven | 8 | 2 | 0.800 | 85.4 | 77.9 | - |
| 4 | HAKRO Merlins Crailsheim | 7 | 2 | 0.778 | 88.8 | 78.1 | - |
| 5 | Artland Dragons | 7 | 3 | 0.700 | 91.6 | 82.7 | - |
| 6 | Bochum | 6 | 4 | 0.600 | 85.3 | 83.8 | - |
| 7 | Nurnberger | 6 | 4 | 0.600 | 82.0 | 81.6 | - |
| 8 | LTi Giessen 46ers | 6 | 4 | 0.600 | 82.7 | 78.5 | - |
| 9 | Tigers Tübingen | 6 | 4 | 0.600 | 82.1 | 79.8 | - |
| 10 | Bayer Giants Leverkusen | 4 | 6 | 0.400 | 78.3 | 90.0 | - |
| 11 | Baskets Koblenz | 4 | 6 | 0.400 | 88.5 | 91.6 | - |
| 12 | Kirchheim | 4 | 6 | 0.400 | 75.9 | 78.7 | - |
| 13 | PS Karlsruhe | 3 | 6 | 0.333 | 80.1 | 85.0 | - |
| 14 | Medi Bayreuth | 3 | 7 | 0.300 | 85.4 | 90.0 | - |
| 15 | Paderborn Baskets | 2 | 8 | 0.200 | 77.3 | 86.0 | - |
| 16 | SBB Baskets Wolmirstedt | 2 | 8 | 0.200 | 78.1 | 87.8 | - |
| 17 | RheinEnergie Koln | 2 | 8 | 0.200 | 75.4 | 85.7 | - |
| 18 | WWU Baskets Munster | 2 | 8 | 0.200 | 74.5 | 84.4 | - |