Scoring Intelligence Panel
Chinese Taipei vs China
Scoring Momentum (Recent Form)
| Metric | Chinese Taipei | China |
|---|---|---|
| Average Total Points (Last 5 Games) | 153.60 | 149.80 |
| Previous 5 Avg | 0 | 0 |
| Trend Line (Last 5 Games) | 161, 151, 145, 153, 158 | 153, 154, 145, 158, 139 |
Team performance vs top opponents
scoring, conceding, and net rating.
| Metric | Chinese Taipei | China |
|---|---|---|
| Avg Pts vs Top 5 Def | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Avg Pts Conceded vs Top 5 Off | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Net Rating vs Top 5 Opps | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Recent momentum
last 5 vs previous 5 games.
| Period | Avg Points Scored | Avg Points Conceded | Net Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last 5 | 78.0 | 78.8 | -0.8 |
| Period | Avg Points Scored | Avg Points Conceded | Net Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last 5 | 89.0 | 67.8 | +21.2 |
Chinese Taipei
Asian Games – Men’s Basketball
League Pos.
0 / 17
| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall |
L
W
W
W
L
|
77.83 |
| Home |
W
W
L
|
76.67 |
| Away |
L
W
W
|
79.00 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 66.7% | 66.7% | 66.7% |
| Total Points Avg | 151.83 | 152 | 151.67 |
| Scored | 77.83 | 76.67 | 79.00 |
| Conceded | 74.00 | 75.33 | 72.67 |
| Pace Avg | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Off. Rating | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Def. Rating | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ATS Cover % | 0% | 0% | 0% |
China
Asian Games – Men’s Basketball
League Pos.
0 / 17
| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall |
L
W
W
W
W
|
86.60 |
| Home |
W
W
W
|
89.33 |
| Away |
L
W
|
82.50 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 80.0% | 100.0% | 50.0% |
| Total Points Avg | 149.8 | 146 | 155.5 |
| Scored | 86.60 | 89.33 | 82.50 |
| Conceded | 63.20 | 56.67 | 73.00 |
| Pace Avg | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Off. Rating | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Def. Rating | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ATS Cover % | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Scoring consistency tracker
Last 10 games & full season
China is +8% better in terms of Points Scored
| Scored Per Game | Chinese Taipei | China |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 33% | 100% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 33% | 0% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 33% | 0% |
China is +8% better in terms of Points Scored
| Scored Per Game | Chinese Taipei | China |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 33% | 100% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 33% | 0% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 33% | 0% |
China is +8% better in terms of Points Scored
| Scored Per Game | Chinese Taipei | China |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 33% | 100% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 33% | 0% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 33% | 0% |
China is +8% better in terms of Points Scored
| Scored Per Game | Chinese Taipei | China |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 33% | 100% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 33% | 0% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 33% | 0% |
Offensive Efficiency & Shooting Profile
Where Teams Gain or Lose Value
Possession Control & Rebounding
Assists. Turnovers. Pace
Defensive Consistency vs Season Average
Last 10 & season games
China is +3% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
| Conceded Per Game | Chinese Taipei | China |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 33% | 50% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 33% | 50% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 33% | 0% |
China is +3% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
| Conceded Per Game | Chinese Taipei | China |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 33% | 50% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 33% | 50% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 33% | 0% |
China is +3% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
| Conceded Per Game | Chinese Taipei | China |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 33% | 50% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 33% | 50% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 33% | 0% |
China is +3% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
| Conceded Per Game | Chinese Taipei | China |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 33% | 50% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 33% | 50% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 33% | 0% |
Defensive Matchup
Edge Style vs Style
Defensive Pressure & Disruption
Who Forces Mistakes?
Total Points Hit-Rate
Scoring trends 10 & seasone games
| Match Points | Chinese Taipei | China | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 140.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Over 150.5 | 67% | 100% | 80% |
| Over 160.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Chinese Taipei | China | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 140.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Under 150.5 | 33% | 0% | 20% |
| Under 160.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Match Points | Chinese Taipei | China | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 140.5 | 67% | 100% | 80% |
| Over 150.5 | 33% | 100% | 60% |
| Over 160.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Chinese Taipei | China | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 140.5 | 33% | 0% | 20% |
| Under 150.5 | 67% | 0% | 40% |
| Under 160.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Match Points | Chinese Taipei | China | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 140.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Over 150.5 | 67% | 100% | 80% |
| Over 160.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Chinese Taipei | China | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 140.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Under 150.5 | 33% | 0% | 20% |
| Under 160.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Match Points | Chinese Taipei | China | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 140.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Over 150.5 | 67% | 100% | 80% |
| Over 160.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Chinese Taipei | China | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 140.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Under 150.5 | 33% | 0% | 20% |
| Under 160.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Chinese Taipei -
Player Projections
Small sample for some players
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Robert Tsang Hinton | |||||||||||||
| Adam Tsang Hinton | |||||||||||||
| Long-Mao Hu | |||||||||||||
| Tseng Hsiang-Chun | |||||||||||||
| Chien hao Ma | |||||||||||||
| Liu Cheng | |||||||||||||
| Chen Ying-Chun | |||||||||||||
| Chen Kuan-Chuan | |||||||||||||
| Gao Jinwei | |||||||||||||
| Brandon Gilbeck | |||||||||||||
| Lin Ting-Chien | |||||||||||||
| Mohammad Al Bachir GADIAGA |
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Robert Tsang Hinton | |||||||||||||
| Adam Tsang Hinton | |||||||||||||
| Long-Mao Hu | |||||||||||||
| Tseng Hsiang-Chun | |||||||||||||
| Chien hao Ma | |||||||||||||
| Liu Cheng | |||||||||||||
| Chen Ying-Chun | |||||||||||||
| Chen Kuan-Chuan | |||||||||||||
| Gao Jinwei | |||||||||||||
| Brandon Gilbeck | |||||||||||||
| Lin Ting-Chien | |||||||||||||
| Mohammad Al Bachir GADIAGA |
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Robert Tsang Hinton | |||||||||||||
| Adam Tsang Hinton | |||||||||||||
| Long-Mao Hu | |||||||||||||
| Tseng Hsiang-Chun | |||||||||||||
| Chien hao Ma | |||||||||||||
| Liu Cheng | |||||||||||||
| Chen Ying-Chun | |||||||||||||
| Chen Kuan-Chuan | |||||||||||||
| Gao Jinwei | |||||||||||||
| Brandon Gilbeck | |||||||||||||
| Lin Ting-Chien | |||||||||||||
| Mohammad Al Bachir GADIAGA |
China -
Player Projections
Small sample for some players
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Lei Meng | |||||||||||||
| Wang Junjie | |||||||||||||
| Li Xiangbo | |||||||||||||
| Hu Mingxuan | |||||||||||||
| Yu Jiahao | |||||||||||||
| Zhao Jiayi | |||||||||||||
| Gao Shiyan | |||||||||||||
| Zhao Rui | |||||||||||||
| Liao Sanning | |||||||||||||
| Zhu Junlong | |||||||||||||
| Cheng Shuaipeng | |||||||||||||
| Hu Jinqiu |
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Lei Meng | |||||||||||||
| Wang Junjie | |||||||||||||
| Li Xiangbo | |||||||||||||
| Hu Mingxuan | |||||||||||||
| Yu Jiahao | |||||||||||||
| Zhao Jiayi | |||||||||||||
| Gao Shiyan | |||||||||||||
| Zhao Rui | |||||||||||||
| Liao Sanning | |||||||||||||
| Zhu Junlong | |||||||||||||
| Cheng Shuaipeng | |||||||||||||
| Hu Jinqiu |
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Lei Meng | |||||||||||||
| Wang Junjie | |||||||||||||
| Li Xiangbo | |||||||||||||
| Hu Mingxuan | |||||||||||||
| Yu Jiahao | |||||||||||||
| Zhao Jiayi | |||||||||||||
| Gao Shiyan | |||||||||||||
| Zhao Rui | |||||||||||||
| Liao Sanning | |||||||||||||
| Zhu Junlong | |||||||||||||
| Cheng Shuaipeng | |||||||||||||
| Hu Jinqiu |
Roasters & Injured Players
| # | Team | W | L | PCT | PPG | OPP PPG | DIFF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Iran | 3 | 0 | 1.000 | 82.7 | 61.0 | 21.7 |
| 2 | Saudi Arabia | 2 | 1 | 0.667 | 75.3 | 70.0 | 5.3 |
| 3 | Kazakhstan | 1 | 2 | 0.333 | 60.3 | 73.7 | -13.3 |
| 4 | United Arab Emirates | 0 | 3 | 0.000 | 57.7 | 71.3 | -13.7 |
| # | Team | W | L | PCT | PPG | OPP PPG | DIFF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | China | 3 | 0 | 1.000 | 91.0 | 56.3 | 34.7 |
| 2 | Chinese Taipei | 2 | 1 | 0.667 | 76.0 | 75.3 | 0.7 |
| 3 | Hong Kong China | 1 | 2 | 0.333 | 60.3 | 80.0 | -19.7 |
| 4 | Mongolia | 0 | 3 | 0.000 | 63.0 | 78.7 | -15.7 |
| 5 | Lebanon | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| # | Team | W | L | PCT | PPG | OPP PPG | DIFF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jordan | 3 | 0 | 1.000 | 89.3 | 61.7 | 27.7 |
| 2 | Philippines | 2 | 1 | 0.667 | 79.3 | 73.3 | 6.0 |
| 3 | Bahrain | 1 | 2 | 0.333 | 65.7 | 78.3 | -12.7 |
| 4 | Thailand | 0 | 3 | 0.000 | 65.7 | 86.7 | -21.0 |
| # | Team | W | L | PCT | PPG | OPP PPG | DIFF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Japan | 3 | 0 | 1.000 | 82.7 | 65.7 | 17.0 |
| 2 | South Korea | 2 | 1 | 0.667 | 82.7 | 67.3 | 15.3 |
| 3 | Qatar | 1 | 2 | 0.333 | 67.0 | 79.3 | -12.3 |
| 4 | Indonesia | 0 | 3 | 0.000 | 59.7 | 79.7 | -20.0 |