Scoring Intelligence Panel
Pato vs Paulistano Amil
Head to Head Statistics
Pato vs Paulistano Amil
Scoring Momentum (Recent Form)
| Metric | Pato | Paulistano Amil |
|---|---|---|
| Average Total Points (Last 5 Games) | 151.20 | 164.00 |
| Previous 5 Avg | 149.40 | 156.80 |
| Trend Line (Last 5 Games) | 157, 155, 144, 161, 139 | 143, 192, 157, 162, 166 |
Team performance vs top opponents
scoring, conceding, and net rating.
| Metric | Pato | Paulistano Amil |
|---|---|---|
| Avg Pts vs Top 5 Def | 0.0 | 67.5 |
| Avg Pts Conceded vs Top 5 Off | 0.0 | 73.5 |
| Net Rating vs Top 5 Opps | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Recent momentum
last 5 vs previous 5 games.
| Period | Avg Points Scored | Avg Points Conceded | Net Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last 5 | 68.2 | 83.0 | -14.8 |
| Previous 5 | 70.4 | 79.0 | -8.6 |
| Period | Avg Points Scored | Avg Points Conceded | Net Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last 5 | 85.4 | 78.6 | +6.8 |
| Previous 5 | 79.2 | 77.6 | +1.6 |
Pato
Brazil - Novo Basquete Brasil
League Pos.
19 / 20
| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall |
L
L
L
W
L
|
70.33 |
| Home |
W
L
L
L
|
72.00 |
| Away |
L
L
L
L
L
|
69.50 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 16.7% | 25.0% | 12.5% |
| Total Points Avg | 151.33 | 147.75 | 153.13 |
| Scored | 70.33 | 72.00 | 69.50 |
| Conceded | 81.00 | 75.75 | 83.63 |
| Pace Avg | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Off. Rating | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Def. Rating | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ATS Cover % | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Paulistano Amil
Brazil - Novo Basquete Brasil
League Pos.
9 / 20
| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall |
W
W
L
L
W
|
79.83 |
| Home |
W
L
W
W
W
|
79.14 |
| Away |
W
L
W
L
L
|
80.80 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 58.3% | 71.4% | 40.0% |
| Total Points Avg | 155.75 | 149.14 | 165 |
| Scored | 79.83 | 79.14 | 80.80 |
| Conceded | 75.92 | 70.00 | 84.20 |
| Pace Avg | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Off. Rating | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Def. Rating | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ATS Cover % | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Scoring consistency tracker
Last 10 games & full season
Paulistano Amil is +24% better in terms of Points Scored
| Scored Per Game | Pato | Paulistano Amil |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 0% | 67% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 33% | 0% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 67% | 33% |
Paulistano Amil is +12% better in terms of Points Scored
| Scored Per Game | Pato | Paulistano Amil |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 0% | 60% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 25% | 0% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 75% | 40% |
Paulistano Amil is +12% better in terms of Points Scored
| Scored Per Game | Pato | Paulistano Amil |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 0% | 60% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 25% | 0% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 75% | 40% |
Paulistano Amil is +12% better in terms of Points Scored
| Scored Per Game | Pato | Paulistano Amil |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 0% | 60% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 25% | 0% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 75% | 40% |
Offensive Efficiency & Shooting Profile
Where Teams Gain or Lose Value
Possession Control & Rebounding
Assists. Turnovers. Pace
Defensive Consistency vs Season Average
Last 10 & season games
Pato is +13% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
| Conceded Per Game | Pato | Paulistano Amil |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 0% | 100% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 67% | 0% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 33% | 0% |
Pato is +10% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
| Conceded Per Game | Pato | Paulistano Amil |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 0% | 80% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 50% | 0% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 50% | 20% |
Pato is +10% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
| Conceded Per Game | Pato | Paulistano Amil |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 0% | 80% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 50% | 0% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 50% | 20% |
Pato is +10% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
| Conceded Per Game | Pato | Paulistano Amil |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 0% | 80% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 50% | 0% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 50% | 20% |
Defensive Matchup
Edge Style vs Style
Defensive Pressure & Disruption
Who Forces Mistakes?
Total Points Hit-Rate
Scoring trends 10 & seasone games
| Match Points | Pato | Paulistano Amil | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 120.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Over 130.5 | 100% | 80% | 89% |
| Over 140.5 | 50% | 80% | 67% |
| Over 150.5 | 50% | 80% | 67% |
| Over 160.5 | 25% | 60% | 44% |
| Over 170.5 | 0% | 60% | 33% |
| Over 180.5 | 0% | 20% | 11% |
| Over 190.5 | 0% | 20% | 11% |
| Over 200.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Pato | Paulistano Amil | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 120.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Under 130.5 | 0% | 20% | 11% |
| Under 140.5 | 50% | 20% | 33% |
| Under 150.5 | 50% | 20% | 33% |
| Under 160.5 | 75% | 40% | 56% |
| Under 170.5 | 100% | 40% | 67% |
| Under 180.5 | 100% | 80% | 89% |
| Under 190.5 | 100% | 80% | 89% |
| Under 200.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Match Points | Pato | Paulistano Amil | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 130.5 | 67% | 67% | 67% |
| Over 140.5 | 33% | 67% | 50% |
| Over 150.5 | 33% | 67% | 50% |
| Over 160.5 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| Over 170.5 | 0% | 33% | 17% |
| Over 180.5 | 0% | 33% | 17% |
| Over 190.5 | 0% | 33% | 17% |
| Over 200.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Pato | Paulistano Amil | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 130.5 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| Under 140.5 | 67% | 33% | 50% |
| Under 150.5 | 67% | 33% | 50% |
| Under 160.5 | 67% | 67% | 67% |
| Under 170.5 | 100% | 67% | 83% |
| Under 180.5 | 100% | 67% | 83% |
| Under 190.5 | 100% | 67% | 83% |
| Under 200.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Match Points | Pato | Paulistano Amil | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 120.5 | 100% | 80% | 89% |
| Over 130.5 | 100% | 60% | 78% |
| Over 140.5 | 50% | 60% | 56% |
| Over 150.5 | 50% | 60% | 56% |
| Over 160.5 | 25% | 40% | 33% |
| Over 170.5 | 0% | 40% | 22% |
| Over 180.5 | 0% | 20% | 11% |
| Over 190.5 | 0% | 20% | 11% |
| Over 200.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Pato | Paulistano Amil | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 120.5 | 0% | 20% | 11% |
| Under 130.5 | 0% | 40% | 22% |
| Under 140.5 | 50% | 40% | 44% |
| Under 150.5 | 50% | 40% | 44% |
| Under 160.5 | 75% | 60% | 67% |
| Under 170.5 | 100% | 60% | 78% |
| Under 180.5 | 100% | 80% | 89% |
| Under 190.5 | 100% | 80% | 89% |
| Under 200.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Match Points | Pato | Paulistano Amil | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 120.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Over 130.5 | 100% | 80% | 89% |
| Over 140.5 | 50% | 80% | 67% |
| Over 150.5 | 50% | 80% | 67% |
| Over 160.5 | 25% | 60% | 44% |
| Over 170.5 | 0% | 60% | 33% |
| Over 180.5 | 0% | 20% | 11% |
| Over 190.5 | 0% | 20% | 11% |
| Over 200.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Pato | Paulistano Amil | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 120.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Under 130.5 | 0% | 20% | 11% |
| Under 140.5 | 50% | 20% | 33% |
| Under 150.5 | 50% | 20% | 33% |
| Under 160.5 | 75% | 40% | 56% |
| Under 170.5 | 100% | 40% | 67% |
| Under 180.5 | 100% | 80% | 89% |
| Under 190.5 | 100% | 80% | 89% |
| Under 200.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Pato -
Player Projections
Small sample for some players
Paulistano Amil -
Player Projections
Small sample for some players
Roasters & Injured Players
| # | Team | W | L | PCT | PPG | OPP PPG | DIFF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Flamengo | 11 | 1 | 0.917 | 89.0 | 73.7 | - |
| 2 | Pitagoras Minas | 10 | 2 | 0.833 | 86.1 | 77.2 | - |
| 3 | CAIXA Brasília Basquete | 9 | 2 | 0.818 | 83.2 | 69.8 | - |
| 4 | Corinthians | 8 | 2 | 0.800 | 84.8 | 74.6 | - |
| 5 | E.c. Pinheiros Sao Paolo | 8 | 2 | 0.800 | 84.3 | 76.5 | - |
| 6 | Vivo Franca | 9 | 3 | 0.750 | 86.1 | 73.0 | - |
| 7 | Mogi das Cruzes | 8 | 3 | 0.727 | 82.7 | 66.1 | - |
| 8 | Sao Jose | 6 | 4 | 0.600 | 77.5 | 75.0 | - |
| 9 | Paulistano Amil | 7 | 5 | 0.583 | 79.8 | 75.9 | - |
| 10 | Unifacisa | 5 | 5 | 0.500 | 79.1 | 79.0 | - |
| 11 | Caxias do Sul | 4 | 5 | 0.444 | 71.6 | 77.4 | - |
| 12 | GRSA Itabom Bauru | 5 | 7 | 0.417 | 72.8 | 75.7 | - |
| 13 | Uniao Corinthians | 4 | 6 | 0.400 | 75.7 | 85.1 | - |
| 14 | Fortaleza B. C. | 3 | 7 | 0.300 | 79.1 | 84.5 | - |
| 15 | Botafogo | 3 | 8 | 0.273 | 70.8 | 80.1 | - |
| 16 | Rio Claro Basquete | 3 | 9 | 0.250 | 76.7 | 88.9 | - |
| 17 | Cruzeiro | 3 | 9 | 0.250 | 77.5 | 87.4 | - |
| 18 | Osasco | 3 | 9 | 0.250 | 75.8 | 86.6 | - |
| 19 | Pato | 2 | 10 | 0.167 | 70.3 | 81.0 | - |
| 20 | SC Vasco da Gama | 0 | 12 | 0.000 | 66.0 | 80.2 | - |