89.00
L
Birmingham Squadron
United States
Sunday Dec 07, 2025 - 16:00 (America/New_York)
Birmingham Squadron vs Texas Legends
Stats, H2H, Live Scores & xG
117.50
L
W
L
L
Texas Legends
Note: The current season has recently started, and one or both teams have played fewer than 5 matches.
Scoring Intelligence Panel
Birmingham Squadron vs Texas Legends
100.7
Possessions / Game
League Average: 101
223
Points / Match
League Average: 233
17.7
( High )
Volatility
League Average: 13.8
🟢 Green = favorable situation (high pace, strong over trend, or very stable totals) ✅ ·
⚪ Gray = neutral, close to league average 👌 ·
🟡 Yellow / 🟠 Orange = warning, results can swing more than usual ⚠️ ·
🔴 Red = unfavorable / high risk (low pace for overs, strong under lean, or very volatile games) ❌
Head to Head Statistics
Birmingham Squadron vs Texas Legends
All Time
Last 3 Games
67%
Over 223.5
2 / 3
33%
Over 233.5
1 / 3
0%
Over 243.5
0 / 3
🟢 Green = value ✅ ·
🟡 Yellow = risky ⚠️ ·
🔴 Red = skip ❌
67%
Over 223.5
2 / 3
33%
Over 233.5
1 / 3
0%
Over 243.5
0 / 3
🟢 Green = value ✅ ·
🟡 Yellow = risky ⚠️ ·
🔴 Red = skip ❌
Scoring Momentum (Recent Form)
| Metric | Birmingham Squadron | Texas Legends |
|---|---|---|
| Average Total Points (Last 5 Games) | 214.80 | 232.80 |
| Previous 5 Avg | 0 | 0 |
| Trend Line (Last 5 Games) | 217, 217, 240, 197, 203 | 216, 211, 222, 256, 259 |
🟢 Green = value ✅ ·
🟡 Yellow = risky ⚠️ ·
🔴 Red = skip ❌
Team performance vs top opponents
scoring, conceding, and net rating.
| Metric | Birmingham Squadron | Texas Legends |
|---|---|---|
| Avg Pts vs Top 5 Def | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Avg Pts Conceded vs Top 5 Off | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Net Rating vs Top 5 Opps | 0.0 | 0.0 |
🟢 Green = value ✅ ·
🟡 Yellow = risky ⚠️ ·
🔴 Red = skip ❌ —
Values are compared to the team's own season average.
These indicators reflect performance against top opponents (TOP 5 offenses and defenses) and help assess true team strength.
Recent momentum
last 5 vs previous 5 games.
Birmingham Squadron
Texas Legends
| Period | Avg Points Scored | Avg Points Conceded | Net Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last 5 | 100.8 | 114.0 | -13.2 |
| Period | Avg Points Scored | Avg Points Conceded | Net Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last 5 | 118.4 | 114.4 | +4.0 |
🟢 Green = improving form 📈 ·
🟡 Yellow = neutral ➖ ·
🔴 Red = declining form 📉 —
Momentum analysis shows whether the team has recently been improving in offense and defense, or on the contrary – losing stability.
Birmingham Squadron
United States - National Basketball Association G League
League Pos.
12 / 16
| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall |
L
L
W
L
W
|
98.57 |
| Home |
L
|
89.00 |
| Away |
L
L
W
L
W
|
100.17 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 28.6% | 0.0% | 33.3% |
| Total Points Avg | 210.14 | 190 | 213.5 |
| Scored | 98.57 | 89.00 | 100.17 |
| Conceded | 111.57 | 101.00 | 113.33 |
| Pace Avg | 96.03 | 95.30 | 96.15 |
| Off. Rating | 103.60 | 93.17 | 105.35 |
| Def. Rating | 86.43 | 94.06 | 85.29 |
| ATS Cover % | 71.4% | 100.0% | 66.7% |
* Pace is not a value indicator but shows game tempo — higher numbers mean faster play and more possessions.
Texas Legends
United States - National Basketball Association G League
League Pos.
9 / 16
| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall |
W
W
L
L
L
|
117.11 |
| Home |
W
W
L
L
W
|
116.80 |
| Away |
L
W
L
L
|
117.50 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 44.4% | 60.0% | 25.0% |
| Total Points Avg | 235.44 | 225.6 | 247.75 |
| Scored | 117.11 | 116.80 | 117.50 |
| Conceded | 118.33 | 108.80 | 130.25 |
| Pace Avg | 104.09 | 102.54 | 105.65 |
| Off. Rating | 114.03 | 117.22 | 110.99 |
| Def. Rating | 86.51 | 93.45 | 80.61 |
| ATS Cover % | 75.0% | 100.0% | 50.0% |
* Pace is not a value indicator but shows game tempo — higher numbers mean faster play and more possessions.
Scoring consistency tracker
Last 10 games & full season
Last 3 ⚠️
Last 5 ⚠️
Last 10 ⚠️
Season
Texas Legends is +34% better in terms of Points Scored
Birmingham Squadron at Home
Texas Legends at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Scored Per Game | Birmingham Squadron | Texas Legends |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 0% | 33% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 67% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 100% | 0% |
🟢 Green = potential value signal · 🟡 Yellow = needs confirmation · 🔴 Red = caution. Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Texas Legends is +32% better in terms of Points Scored
Birmingham Squadron at Home
Texas Legends at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Scored Per Game | Birmingham Squadron | Texas Legends |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 0% | 25% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 75% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 100% | 0% |
🟢 Green = potential value signal · 🟡 Yellow = needs confirmation · 🔴 Red = caution. Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Texas Legends is +32% better in terms of Points Scored
Birmingham Squadron at Home
Texas Legends at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Scored Per Game | Birmingham Squadron | Texas Legends |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 0% | 25% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 75% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 100% | 0% |
🟢 Green = potential value signal · 🟡 Yellow = needs confirmation · 🔴 Red = caution. Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Texas Legends is +32% better in terms of Points Scored
Birmingham Squadron at Home
Texas Legends at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Scored Per Game | Birmingham Squadron | Texas Legends |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 0% | 25% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 75% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 100% | 0% |
🟢 Green = potential value signal · 🟡 Yellow = needs confirmation · 🔴 Red = caution. Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Offensive Efficiency & Shooting Profile
Where Teams Gain or Lose Value
🟢 Green = strong efficiency or shooting edge · 🟡 Yellow = balanced/average · 🔴 Red = weakness, needs caution. Some stats (like 3P Rate and FT Rate) indicate playing style, not necessarily good or bad — interpret in context.
Possession Control & Rebounding
Assists. Turnovers. Pace
Defensive Consistency vs Season Average
Last 10 & season games
Last 3 ⚠️
Last 5 ⚠️
Last 10 ⚠️
Season
Birmingham Squadron is +22% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
Birmingham Squadron at Home
Texas Legends at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Conceded Per Game | Birmingham Squadron | Texas Legends |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 0% | 67% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 33% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 100% | 0% |
🟢 Green = strong defensive hold (unders-friendly) · 🟡 Yellow = neutral · 🔴 Red = weak defense (overs risk). Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Birmingham Squadron is +22% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
Birmingham Squadron at Home
Texas Legends at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Conceded Per Game | Birmingham Squadron | Texas Legends |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 0% | 75% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 25% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 100% | 0% |
🟢 Green = strong defensive hold (unders-friendly) · 🟡 Yellow = neutral · 🔴 Red = weak defense (overs risk). Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Birmingham Squadron is +22% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
Birmingham Squadron at Home
Texas Legends at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Conceded Per Game | Birmingham Squadron | Texas Legends |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 0% | 75% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 25% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 100% | 0% |
🟢 Green = strong defensive hold (unders-friendly) · 🟡 Yellow = neutral · 🔴 Red = weak defense (overs risk). Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Birmingham Squadron is +22% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
Birmingham Squadron at Home
Texas Legends at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Conceded Per Game | Birmingham Squadron | Texas Legends |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 0% | 75% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 25% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 100% | 0% |
🟢 Green = strong defensive hold (unders-friendly) · 🟡 Yellow = neutral · 🔴 Red = weak defense (overs risk). Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Defensive Matchup
Edge Style vs Style
🟢 Green = Clear defensive edge (profitable trend) · 🟡 Yellow = Neutral (no big edge) · 🔴 Red = Weak defense / exploitable
Defensive Pressure & Disruption
Who Forces Mistakes?
🟢 Green = Strong edge · 🟡 Yellow = Average · 🔴 Red = Weak edge
* Rate = per 100 possessions. · Others = per game averages.
Total Points Hit-Rate
Scoring trends 10 & seasone games
Last 3 ⚠️
Last 5 ⚠️
Last 10 ⚠️
Season
Over X Points
Under X Points
| Match Points | Birmingham Squadron | Texas Legends | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 190.5 | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| Over 200.5 | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| Over 210.5 | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| Over 220.5 | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| Over 230.5 | 0% | 75% | 60% |
| Over 240.5 | 0% | 75% | 60% |
| Over 250.5 | 0% | 50% | 40% |
| Over 260.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Birmingham Squadron | Texas Legends | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 190.5 | 100% | 0% | 20% |
| Under 200.5 | 100% | 0% | 20% |
| Under 210.5 | 100% | 0% | 20% |
| Under 220.5 | 100% | 0% | 20% |
| Under 230.5 | 100% | 25% | 40% |
| Under 240.5 | 100% | 25% | 40% |
| Under 250.5 | 100% | 50% | 60% |
| Under 260.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
🟢 Green = Strong over-trend· 🟡 Yellow = Balanced · 🔴 Red = Weak over-trend
Over X Points
Under X Points
| Match Points | Birmingham Squadron | Texas Legends | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 190.5 | 0% | 67% | 50% |
| Over 200.5 | 0% | 67% | 50% |
| Over 210.5 | 0% | 67% | 50% |
| Over 220.5 | 0% | 67% | 50% |
| Over 230.5 | 0% | 33% | 25% |
| Over 240.5 | 0% | 33% | 25% |
| Over 250.5 | 0% | 33% | 25% |
| Over 260.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Birmingham Squadron | Texas Legends | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 190.5 | 100% | 33% | 50% |
| Under 200.5 | 100% | 33% | 50% |
| Under 210.5 | 100% | 33% | 50% |
| Under 220.5 | 100% | 33% | 50% |
| Under 230.5 | 100% | 67% | 75% |
| Under 240.5 | 100% | 67% | 75% |
| Under 250.5 | 100% | 67% | 75% |
| Under 260.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
🟢 Green = Strong over-trend· 🟡 Yellow = Balanced · 🔴 Red = Weak over-trend
Over X Points
Under X Points
| Match Points | Birmingham Squadron | Texas Legends | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 190.5 | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| Over 200.5 | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| Over 210.5 | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| Over 220.5 | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| Over 230.5 | 0% | 75% | 60% |
| Over 240.5 | 0% | 75% | 60% |
| Over 250.5 | 0% | 50% | 40% |
| Over 260.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Birmingham Squadron | Texas Legends | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 190.5 | 100% | 0% | 20% |
| Under 200.5 | 100% | 0% | 20% |
| Under 210.5 | 100% | 0% | 20% |
| Under 220.5 | 100% | 0% | 20% |
| Under 230.5 | 100% | 25% | 40% |
| Under 240.5 | 100% | 25% | 40% |
| Under 250.5 | 100% | 50% | 60% |
| Under 260.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
🟢 Green = Strong over-trend· 🟡 Yellow = Balanced · 🔴 Red = Weak over-trend
Over X Points
Under X Points
| Match Points | Birmingham Squadron | Texas Legends | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 190.5 | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| Over 200.5 | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| Over 210.5 | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| Over 220.5 | 0% | 100% | 80% |
| Over 230.5 | 0% | 75% | 60% |
| Over 240.5 | 0% | 75% | 60% |
| Over 250.5 | 0% | 50% | 40% |
| Over 260.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Birmingham Squadron | Texas Legends | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 190.5 | 100% | 0% | 20% |
| Under 200.5 | 100% | 0% | 20% |
| Under 210.5 | 100% | 0% | 20% |
| Under 220.5 | 100% | 0% | 20% |
| Under 230.5 | 100% | 25% | 40% |
| Under 240.5 | 100% | 25% | 40% |
| Under 250.5 | 100% | 50% | 60% |
| Under 260.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
🟢 Green = Strong over-trend· 🟡 Yellow = Balanced · 🔴 Red = Weak over-trend
Texas Legends -
Player Projections
Small sample for some players
Last 5 Games
Last 10 Games
Season
OUT Players
Reset all to IN
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Zhaire Smith | |||||||||||||
| Dakota Rivers | |||||||||||||
| Asanti Price | |||||||||||||
| Tray Maddox Jr. | |||||||||||||
| Teafale Lenard, Jr. | |||||||||||||
| Jordan Hall | |||||||||||||
| Jazian Gortman | |||||||||||||
| Max Fiedler | |||||||||||||
| Garrett Denbow |
OUT Players
Reset all to IN
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Zhaire Smith | |||||||||||||
| Dakota Rivers | |||||||||||||
| Asanti Price | |||||||||||||
| Tray Maddox Jr. | |||||||||||||
| Teafale Lenard, Jr. | |||||||||||||
| Jordan Hall | |||||||||||||
| Jazian Gortman | |||||||||||||
| Max Fiedler | |||||||||||||
| Garrett Denbow |
OUT Players
Reset all to IN
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Zhaire Smith | |||||||||||||
| Dakota Rivers | |||||||||||||
| Asanti Price | |||||||||||||
| Tray Maddox Jr. | |||||||||||||
| Teafale Lenard, Jr. | |||||||||||||
| Jordan Hall | |||||||||||||
| Jazian Gortman | |||||||||||||
| Max Fiedler | |||||||||||||
| Garrett Denbow |
* Colored values are our “value check” candidates. Always compare with market lines before deciding.
Roasters & Injured Players
Birmingham Squadron
Texas Legends
Roasters
No roster players listed for this team.
Injured
No injured players listed for either team.
| # | Team | W | L | PCT | PPG | OPP PPG | DIFF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Raptors 905 | 7 | 0 | 1.000 | 120.9 | 98.9 | 22.0 |
| 2 | Osceola Magic | 6 | 2 | 0.750 | 124.6 | 112.0 | 12.6 |
| 3 | Grand Rapids Gold | 7 | 3 | 0.700 | 123.4 | 116.4 | 7.0 |
| 4 | Maine Celtics | 6 | 3 | 0.667 | 114.3 | 109.0 | 5.3 |
| 5 | Windy City Bulls | 5 | 3 | 0.625 | 130.3 | 128.5 | 1.8 |
| 6 | Greensboro colony | 6 | 4 | 0.600 | 122.0 | 119.9 | 2.1 |
| 7 | Cleveland Charge | 5 | 5 | 0.500 | 125.3 | 125.5 | -0.2 |
| 8 | Capital City Go-Go | 4 | 4 | 0.500 | 108.0 | 109.5 | -1.5 |
| 9 | Delaware Blue Coats | 3 | 5 | 0.375 | 120.5 | 120.3 | 0.2 |
| 10 | Long Island Nets | 3 | 5 | 0.375 | 111.4 | 115.9 | -4.5 |
| 11 | Motor City Cruise | 3 | 6 | 0.333 | 113.9 | 120.1 | -6.2 |
| 12 | Birmingham Squadron | 2 | 5 | 0.286 | 98.6 | 111.6 | -13.0 |
| 13 | College Park Skyhawks | 2 | 5 | 0.286 | 104.3 | 119.3 | -15.0 |
| 14 | Indiana Mad Ants | 2 | 7 | 0.222 | 116.0 | 121.1 | -5.1 |
| 15 | Wisconsin Herd | 2 | 7 | 0.222 | 109.4 | 114.8 | -5.4 |
| 16 | Westchester Knicks | 1 | 6 | 0.143 | 102.7 | 113.0 | -10.3 |
| # | Team | W | L | PCT | PPG | OPP PPG | DIFF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Austin Spurs | 9 | 1 | 0.900 | 116.6 | 105.4 | 11.2 |
| 2 | Salt Lake City Stars | 7 | 1 | 0.875 | 128.3 | 112.6 | 15.7 |
| 3 | Iowa Wolves | 6 | 2 | 0.750 | 137.8 | 128.8 | 9.0 |
| 4 | South Bay Lakers | 5 | 2 | 0.714 | 120.3 | 112.1 | 8.2 |
| 5 | Stockton Kings | 6 | 3 | 0.667 | 122.0 | 114.7 | 7.3 |
| 6 | Rip City Remix | 4 | 2 | 0.667 | 116.5 | 112.0 | 4.5 |
| 7 | San Diego Clippers | 4 | 2 | 0.667 | 111.3 | 111.8 | -0.5 |
| 8 | Sioux Falls Skyforce | 7 | 4 | 0.636 | 126.0 | 126.4 | -0.4 |
| 9 | Texas Legends | 4 | 5 | 0.444 | 117.1 | 118.3 | -1.2 |
| 10 | Mexico City Capitanes | 4 | 5 | 0.444 | 110.1 | 109.4 | 0.7 |
| 11 | Oklahoma City Blue | 4 | 6 | 0.400 | 109.1 | 111.6 | -2.5 |
| 12 | Rio Grande Valley Vipers | 3 | 5 | 0.375 | 118.1 | 121.9 | -3.8 |
| 13 | Memphis Hustle | 3 | 6 | 0.333 | 110.4 | 117.3 | -6.9 |
| 14 | Valley Suns | 0 | 7 | 0.000 | 108.1 | 123.6 | -15.5 |
| 15 | Santa Cruz Warriors | 0 | 9 | 0.000 | 104.6 | 122.8 | -18.2 |
Monthly & Opponent Breakdown (How to Use)
Compares a team/player’s overall averages to their performance vs a specific opponent.
Why it’s useful:
Betting use:
Game Outcome Summary (How to Use)