0
Buasn KCC Egis
Korea Republic
Saturday Nov 15, 2025 - 02:30 (America/New_York)
Buasn KCC Egis vs Ulsan Mobis Phoebus
Stats, H2H, Live Scores & xG
78.57
W
L
W
L
W
Ulsan Mobis Phoebus
Note: The current season has recently started, and one or both teams have played fewer than 5 matches.
Scoring Intelligence Panel
Buasn KCC Egis vs Ulsan Mobis Phoebus
35.8
Possessions / Game
League Average: 73.3
151
Points / Match
League Average: 152
15.1
( High )
Volatility
League Average: 12.5
🟢 Green = favorable situation (high pace, strong over trend, or very stable totals) ✅ ·
⚪ Gray = neutral, close to league average 👌 ·
🟡 Yellow / 🟠 Orange = warning, results can swing more than usual ⚠️ ·
🔴 Red = unfavorable / high risk (low pace for overs, strong under lean, or very volatile games) ❌
Head to Head Statistics
Buasn KCC Egis vs Ulsan Mobis Phoebus
All Time
Last 3 Games
3%
Over 142.5
1 / 30
40%
Over 152.5
12 / 30
57%
Over 162.5
17 / 30
🟢 Green = value ✅ ·
🟡 Yellow = risky ⚠️ ·
🔴 Red = skip ❌
0%
Over 142.5
0 / 3
100%
Over 152.5
3 / 3
0%
Over 162.5
0 / 3
🟢 Green = value ✅ ·
🟡 Yellow = risky ⚠️ ·
🔴 Red = skip ❌
Scoring Momentum (Recent Form)
| Metric | Buasn KCC Egis | Ulsan Mobis Phoebus |
|---|---|---|
| Average Total Points (Last 5 Games) | 157.60 | 151.00 |
| Previous 5 Avg | 136.60 | 155.00 |
| Trend Line (Last 5 Games) | 144, 170, 144, 177, 153 | 126, 142, 171, 167, 149 |
🟢 Green = value ✅ ·
🟡 Yellow = risky ⚠️ ·
🔴 Red = skip ❌
Team performance vs top opponents
scoring, conceding, and net rating.
| Metric | Buasn KCC Egis | Ulsan Mobis Phoebus |
|---|---|---|
| Avg Pts vs Top 5 Def | 72.0 | 69.2 |
| Avg Pts Conceded vs Top 5 Off | 74.2 | 79.2 |
| Net Rating vs Top 5 Opps | +0.7 | -14.1 |
🟢 Green = value ✅ ·
🟡 Yellow = risky ⚠️ ·
🔴 Red = skip ❌ —
Values are compared to the team's own season average.
These indicators reflect performance against top opponents (TOP 5 offenses and defenses) and help assess true team strength.
Recent momentum
last 5 vs previous 5 games.
Buasn KCC Egis
Ulsan Mobis Phoebus
| Period | Avg Points Scored | Avg Points Conceded | Net Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last 5 | 81.2 | 83.8 | -2.6 |
| Previous 5 | 69.0 | 75.6 | -6.6 |
| Period | Avg Points Scored | Avg Points Conceded | Net Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last 5 | 65.2 | 77.6 | -12.4 |
| Previous 5 | 80.2 | 80.8 | -0.6 |
🟢 Green = improving form 📈 ·
🟡 Yellow = neutral ➖ ·
🔴 Red = declining form 📉 —
Momentum analysis shows whether the team has recently been improving in offense and defense, or on the contrary – losing stability.
Buasn KCC Egis
Korea Republic - Korean Basketball League
League Pos.
4 / 10
| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall |
L
W
L
L
L
|
74.00 |
| Home |
|
0 |
| Away |
L
W
L
L
L
|
74.00 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 53.8% | 0% | 53.8% |
| Total Points Avg | 149.85 | 0 | 149.85 |
| Scored | 74.00 | 0 | 74.00 |
| Conceded | 75.85 | 0 | 75.85 |
| Pace Avg | 73.67 | 71.39 | 74.00 |
| Off. Rating | 103.44 | 112.19 | 102.21 |
| Def. Rating | 94.44 | 86.42 | 95.64 |
| ATS Cover % | 43.8% | 50.0% | 42.9% |
* Pace is not a value indicator but shows game tempo — higher numbers mean faster play and more possessions.
Ulsan Mobis Phoebus
Korea Republic - Korean Basketball League
League Pos.
9 / 10
| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall |
L
W
W
L
L
|
74.29 |
| Home |
L
W
L
L
W
|
70.00 |
| Away |
W
L
W
L
W
|
78.57 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 42.9% | 28.6% | 57.1% |
| Total Points Avg | 151.58 | 147.29 | 155.86 |
| Scored | 74.29 | 70.00 | 78.57 |
| Conceded | 77.29 | 77.29 | 77.29 |
| Pace Avg | 71.90 | 71.68 | 72.10 |
| Off. Rating | 102.03 | 96.96 | 106.58 |
| Def. Rating | 91.93 | 90.00 | 93.68 |
| ATS Cover % | 29.4% | 25.0% | 33.3% |
* Pace is not a value indicator but shows game tempo — higher numbers mean faster play and more possessions.
Scoring consistency tracker
Last 10 games & full season
Last 3 ⚠️
Last 5 ⚠️
Last 10 ⚠️
Season
Ulsan Mobis Phoebus is +100% better in terms of Points Scored
Buasn KCC Egis at Home
Ulsan Mobis Phoebus at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Scored Per Game | Buasn KCC Egis | Ulsan Mobis Phoebus |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 0% | 100% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 0% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 0% | 0% |
🟢 Green = potential value signal · 🟡 Yellow = needs confirmation · 🔴 Red = caution. Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Ulsan Mobis Phoebus is +100% better in terms of Points Scored
Buasn KCC Egis at Home
Ulsan Mobis Phoebus at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Scored Per Game | Buasn KCC Egis | Ulsan Mobis Phoebus |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 0% | 60% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 20% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 0% | 20% |
🟢 Green = potential value signal · 🟡 Yellow = needs confirmation · 🔴 Red = caution. Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Ulsan Mobis Phoebus is +100% better in terms of Points Scored
Buasn KCC Egis at Home
Ulsan Mobis Phoebus at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Scored Per Game | Buasn KCC Egis | Ulsan Mobis Phoebus |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 0% | 57% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 29% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 0% | 14% |
🟢 Green = potential value signal · 🟡 Yellow = needs confirmation · 🔴 Red = caution. Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Ulsan Mobis Phoebus is +100% better in terms of Points Scored
Buasn KCC Egis at Home
Ulsan Mobis Phoebus at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Scored Per Game | Buasn KCC Egis | Ulsan Mobis Phoebus |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 0% | 57% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 29% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 0% | 14% |
🟢 Green = potential value signal · 🟡 Yellow = needs confirmation · 🔴 Red = caution. Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Offensive Efficiency & Shooting Profile
Where Teams Gain or Lose Value
🟢 Green = strong efficiency or shooting edge · 🟡 Yellow = balanced/average · 🔴 Red = weakness, needs caution. Some stats (like 3P Rate and FT Rate) indicate playing style, not necessarily good or bad — interpret in context.
Possession Control & Rebounding
Assists. Turnovers. Pace
Defensive Consistency vs Season Average
Last 10 & season games
Last 3 ⚠️
Last 5 ⚠️
Last 10 ⚠️
Season
Buasn KCC Egis is +100% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
Buasn KCC Egis at Home
Ulsan Mobis Phoebus at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Conceded Per Game | Buasn KCC Egis | Ulsan Mobis Phoebus |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 0% | 33% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 67% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 0% | 0% |
🟢 Green = strong defensive hold (unders-friendly) · 🟡 Yellow = neutral · 🔴 Red = weak defense (overs risk). Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Buasn KCC Egis is +100% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
Buasn KCC Egis at Home
Ulsan Mobis Phoebus at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Conceded Per Game | Buasn KCC Egis | Ulsan Mobis Phoebus |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 0% | 20% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 80% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 0% | 0% |
🟢 Green = strong defensive hold (unders-friendly) · 🟡 Yellow = neutral · 🔴 Red = weak defense (overs risk). Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Buasn KCC Egis is +100% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
Buasn KCC Egis at Home
Ulsan Mobis Phoebus at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Conceded Per Game | Buasn KCC Egis | Ulsan Mobis Phoebus |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 0% | 14% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 71% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 0% | 14% |
🟢 Green = strong defensive hold (unders-friendly) · 🟡 Yellow = neutral · 🔴 Red = weak defense (overs risk). Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Buasn KCC Egis is +100% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
Buasn KCC Egis at Home
Ulsan Mobis Phoebus at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Conceded Per Game | Buasn KCC Egis | Ulsan Mobis Phoebus |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 0% | 14% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 71% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 0% | 14% |
🟢 Green = strong defensive hold (unders-friendly) · 🟡 Yellow = neutral · 🔴 Red = weak defense (overs risk). Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Defensive Matchup
Edge Style vs Style
🟢 Green = Clear defensive edge (profitable trend) · 🟡 Yellow = Neutral (no big edge) · 🔴 Red = Weak defense / exploitable
Defensive Pressure & Disruption
Who Forces Mistakes?
🟢 Green = Strong edge · 🟡 Yellow = Average · 🔴 Red = Weak edge
* Rate = per 100 possessions. · Others = per game averages.
Total Points Hit-Rate
Scoring trends 10 & seasone games
Last 3 ⚠️
Last 5 ⚠️
Last 10 ⚠️
Season
Over X Points
Under X Points
| Match Points | Buasn KCC Egis | Ulsan Mobis Phoebus | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 140.5 | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| Over 150.5 | 0% | 71% | 71% |
| Over 160.5 | 0% | 29% | 29% |
| Over 170.5 | 0% | 14% | 14% |
| Over 180.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Buasn KCC Egis | Ulsan Mobis Phoebus | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 140.5 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| Under 150.5 | 100% | 29% | 29% |
| Under 160.5 | 100% | 71% | 71% |
| Under 170.5 | 100% | 86% | 86% |
| Under 180.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
🟢 Green = Strong over-trend· 🟡 Yellow = Balanced · 🔴 Red = Weak over-trend
Over X Points
Under X Points
| Match Points | Buasn KCC Egis | Ulsan Mobis Phoebus | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 160.5 | 0% | 67% | 67% |
| Over 170.5 | 0% | 33% | 33% |
| Over 180.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Buasn KCC Egis | Ulsan Mobis Phoebus | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 160.5 | 100% | 33% | 33% |
| Under 170.5 | 100% | 67% | 67% |
| Under 180.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
🟢 Green = Strong over-trend· 🟡 Yellow = Balanced · 🔴 Red = Weak over-trend
Over X Points
Under X Points
| Match Points | Buasn KCC Egis | Ulsan Mobis Phoebus | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 140.5 | 0% | 80% | 80% |
| Over 150.5 | 0% | 60% | 60% |
| Over 160.5 | 0% | 40% | 40% |
| Over 170.5 | 0% | 20% | 20% |
| Over 180.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Buasn KCC Egis | Ulsan Mobis Phoebus | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 140.5 | 100% | 20% | 20% |
| Under 150.5 | 100% | 40% | 40% |
| Under 160.5 | 100% | 60% | 60% |
| Under 170.5 | 100% | 80% | 80% |
| Under 180.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
🟢 Green = Strong over-trend· 🟡 Yellow = Balanced · 🔴 Red = Weak over-trend
Over X Points
Under X Points
| Match Points | Buasn KCC Egis | Ulsan Mobis Phoebus | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 140.5 | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| Over 150.5 | 0% | 71% | 71% |
| Over 160.5 | 0% | 29% | 29% |
| Over 170.5 | 0% | 14% | 14% |
| Over 180.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Buasn KCC Egis | Ulsan Mobis Phoebus | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 140.5 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
| Under 150.5 | 100% | 29% | 29% |
| Under 160.5 | 100% | 71% | 71% |
| Under 170.5 | 100% | 86% | 86% |
| Under 180.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
🟢 Green = Strong over-trend· 🟡 Yellow = Balanced · 🔴 Red = Weak over-trend
Buasn KCC Egis -
Player Projections
Small sample for some players
Last 5 Games
Last 10 Games
Season
List of OUT players:
Reset all to IN
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Kim Hoon | |||||||||||||
| Choi Jin-Gwang | |||||||||||||
| Heo Hoon | |||||||||||||
| Jang Jae-seok | |||||||||||||
| Lee Chan-young | |||||||||||||
| Lee Hyun-Ho | |||||||||||||
| Hyukjae Jo | |||||||||||||
| Kim Dong-Hyun | |||||||||||||
| Yeo Jun-hyung | |||||||||||||
| Heo Ung | |||||||||||||
| Lee Ju-Young | |||||||||||||
| Lee Ho-Hyun | |||||||||||||
| Jung Bae Kwon | |||||||||||||
| Choi Jun-yong | |||||||||||||
| Song Kyo-chang | |||||||||||||
| William Raniel Navarro | |||||||||||||
| Dewan Hernandez | |||||||||||||
| Shawn Long | |||||||||||||
| Taehyun KANG | |||||||||||||
| Kim Yoonsung | |||||||||||||
| Yoon Ki-chan |
List of OUT players:
Reset all to IN
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Kim Hoon | |||||||||||||
| Choi Jin-Gwang | |||||||||||||
| Heo Hoon | |||||||||||||
| Jang Jae-seok | |||||||||||||
| Lee Chan-young | |||||||||||||
| Lee Hyun-Ho | |||||||||||||
| Hyukjae Jo | |||||||||||||
| Kim Dong-Hyun | |||||||||||||
| Yeo Jun-hyung | |||||||||||||
| Heo Ung | |||||||||||||
| Lee Ju-Young | |||||||||||||
| Lee Ho-Hyun | |||||||||||||
| Jung Bae Kwon | |||||||||||||
| Choi Jun-yong | |||||||||||||
| Song Kyo-chang | |||||||||||||
| William Raniel Navarro | |||||||||||||
| Dewan Hernandez | |||||||||||||
| Shawn Long | |||||||||||||
| Taehyun KANG | |||||||||||||
| Kim Yoonsung | |||||||||||||
| Yoon Ki-chan |
List of OUT players:
Reset all to IN
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Kim Hoon | |||||||||||||
| Choi Jin-Gwang | |||||||||||||
| Heo Hoon | |||||||||||||
| Jang Jae-seok | |||||||||||||
| Lee Chan-young | |||||||||||||
| Lee Hyun-Ho | |||||||||||||
| Hyukjae Jo | |||||||||||||
| Kim Dong-Hyun | |||||||||||||
| Yeo Jun-hyung | |||||||||||||
| Heo Ung | |||||||||||||
| Lee Ju-Young | |||||||||||||
| Lee Ho-Hyun | |||||||||||||
| Jung Bae Kwon | |||||||||||||
| Choi Jun-yong | |||||||||||||
| Song Kyo-chang | |||||||||||||
| William Raniel Navarro | |||||||||||||
| Dewan Hernandez | |||||||||||||
| Shawn Long | |||||||||||||
| Taehyun KANG | |||||||||||||
| Kim Yoonsung | |||||||||||||
| Yoon Ki-chan |
* Colored values are our “value check” candidates. Always compare with market lines before deciding.
Ulsan Mobis Phoebus -
Player Projections
Small sample for some players
Last 5 Games
Last 10 Games
Season
OUT Players
Reset all to IN
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Park Jun-Hyung | |||||||||||||
| Lee Dae-Kyun | |||||||||||||
| Kang Hyun-soo | |||||||||||||
| Kim Dong-Jun | |||||||||||||
| Lee Dae-Heon | |||||||||||||
| Kim Geun-Hyun | |||||||||||||
| Lee Do-Heon | |||||||||||||
| Lee Woo-jung | |||||||||||||
| Jeong Joon-Won | |||||||||||||
| Lee Seung-Hyun | |||||||||||||
| Jeon Jun-Beom | |||||||||||||
| Jo Han-jin | |||||||||||||
| Ham Ji-hoon | |||||||||||||
| Miguel Andre Oczon | |||||||||||||
| Bak Jun-is | |||||||||||||
| Seo Myeon-gjin | |||||||||||||
| Park Mu-bin | |||||||||||||
| Lee Seung-woo | |||||||||||||
| Eric Romero | |||||||||||||
| Rayshaun Hammonds | |||||||||||||
| Kim Geon-ha | |||||||||||||
| Park Jeong-hwan | |||||||||||||
| Kim Tae-Hun |
OUT Players
Reset all to IN
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Park Jun-Hyung | |||||||||||||
| Lee Dae-Kyun | |||||||||||||
| Kang Hyun-soo | |||||||||||||
| Kim Dong-Jun | |||||||||||||
| Lee Dae-Heon | |||||||||||||
| Kim Geun-Hyun | |||||||||||||
| Lee Do-Heon | |||||||||||||
| Lee Woo-jung | |||||||||||||
| Jeong Joon-Won | |||||||||||||
| Lee Seung-Hyun | |||||||||||||
| Jeon Jun-Beom | |||||||||||||
| Jo Han-jin | |||||||||||||
| Ham Ji-hoon | |||||||||||||
| Miguel Andre Oczon | |||||||||||||
| Bak Jun-is | |||||||||||||
| Seo Myeon-gjin | |||||||||||||
| Park Mu-bin | |||||||||||||
| Lee Seung-woo | |||||||||||||
| Eric Romero | |||||||||||||
| Rayshaun Hammonds | |||||||||||||
| Kim Geon-ha | |||||||||||||
| Park Jeong-hwan | |||||||||||||
| Kim Tae-Hun |
OUT Players
Reset all to IN
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Park Jun-Hyung | |||||||||||||
| Lee Dae-Kyun | |||||||||||||
| Kang Hyun-soo | |||||||||||||
| Kim Dong-Jun | |||||||||||||
| Lee Dae-Heon | |||||||||||||
| Kim Geun-Hyun | |||||||||||||
| Lee Do-Heon | |||||||||||||
| Lee Woo-jung | |||||||||||||
| Jeong Joon-Won | |||||||||||||
| Lee Seung-Hyun | |||||||||||||
| Jeon Jun-Beom | |||||||||||||
| Jo Han-jin | |||||||||||||
| Ham Ji-hoon | |||||||||||||
| Miguel Andre Oczon | |||||||||||||
| Bak Jun-is | |||||||||||||
| Seo Myeon-gjin | |||||||||||||
| Park Mu-bin | |||||||||||||
| Lee Seung-woo | |||||||||||||
| Eric Romero | |||||||||||||
| Rayshaun Hammonds | |||||||||||||
| Kim Geon-ha | |||||||||||||
| Park Jeong-hwan | |||||||||||||
| Kim Tae-Hun |
* Colored values are our “value check” candidates. Always compare with market lines before deciding.
Roasters & Injured Players
Buasn KCC Egis
Ulsan Mobis Phoebus
Roasters
Injured
No injured players listed for either team.
| # | Team | W | L | PCT | PPG | OPP PPG | DIFF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Changwon LG Sakers | 12 | 4 | 0.750 | 77.1 | 71.3 | - |
| 2 | Anyang JungKwanJang Red Boosters | 10 | 6 | 0.625 | 74.3 | 68.9 | - |
| 3 | Wonju Dongbu Promy | 10 | 7 | 0.588 | 78.4 | 77.3 | - |
| 4 | Buasn KCC Egis | 9 | 7 | 0.562 | 76.1 | 77.6 | - |
| 5 | Seoul SK Knights | 9 | 8 | 0.529 | 79.2 | 75.1 | - |
| 6 | Suwon KT Sonicboom | 9 | 8 | 0.529 | 72.3 | 76.4 | - |
| 7 | Seoul Samsung Thunders | 7 | 10 | 0.412 | 80.5 | 81.2 | - |
| 8 | Goyang Sono Skygunners | 7 | 10 | 0.412 | 76.3 | 75.8 | - |
| 9 | Ulsan Mobis Phoebus | 6 | 11 | 0.353 | 73.1 | 78.0 | - |
| 10 | Daegu KOGAS Pegasus | 4 | 12 | 0.250 | 74.3 | 79.7 | - |
Monthly & Opponent Breakdown (How to Use)
Compares a team/player’s overall averages to their performance vs a specific opponent.
Why it’s useful:
Betting use:
Game Outcome Summary (How to Use)