75.29
W
W
W
W
L
Changwon LG Sakers
Korea Republic
Saturday Dec 06, 2025 - 00:00 (America/New_York)
Changwon LG Sakers vs Ulsan Mobis Phoebus
Stats, H2H, Live Scores & xG
76.00
L
L
W
L
W
Ulsan Mobis Phoebus
Scoring Intelligence Panel
Changwon LG Sakers vs Ulsan Mobis Phoebus
72.4
Possessions / Game
League Average: 73.3
150
Points / Match
League Average: 152
16.7
( High )
Volatility
League Average: 12.5
🟢 Green = favorable situation (high pace, strong over trend, or very stable totals) ✅ ·
⚪ Gray = neutral, close to league average 👌 ·
🟡 Yellow / 🟠 Orange = warning, results can swing more than usual ⚠️ ·
🔴 Red = unfavorable / high risk (low pace for overs, strong under lean, or very volatile games) ❌
Head to Head Statistics
Changwon LG Sakers vs Ulsan Mobis Phoebus
All Time
Last 3 Games
17%
Over 142.5
5 / 30
50%
Over 152.5
15 / 30
33%
Over 162.5
10 / 30
🟢 Green = value ✅ ·
🟡 Yellow = risky ⚠️ ·
🔴 Red = skip ❌
0%
Over 142.5
0 / 3
100%
Over 152.5
3 / 3
0%
Over 162.5
0 / 3
🟢 Green = value ✅ ·
🟡 Yellow = risky ⚠️ ·
🔴 Red = skip ❌
Scoring Momentum (Recent Form)
| Metric | Changwon LG Sakers | Ulsan Mobis Phoebus |
|---|---|---|
| Average Total Points (Last 5 Games) | 148.80 | 142.80 |
| Previous 5 Avg | 150.40 | 161.00 |
| Trend Line (Last 5 Games) | 148, 149, 178, 144, 125 | 157, 124, 165, 126, 142 |
🟢 Green = value ✅ ·
🟡 Yellow = risky ⚠️ ·
🔴 Red = skip ❌
Team performance vs top opponents
scoring, conceding, and net rating.
| Metric | Changwon LG Sakers | Ulsan Mobis Phoebus |
|---|---|---|
| Avg Pts vs Top 5 Def | 72.6 | 69.2 |
| Avg Pts Conceded vs Top 5 Off | 68.8 | 79.2 |
| Net Rating vs Top 5 Opps | +5.9 | -14.1 |
🟢 Green = value ✅ ·
🟡 Yellow = risky ⚠️ ·
🔴 Red = skip ❌ —
Values are compared to the team's own season average.
These indicators reflect performance against top opponents (TOP 5 offenses and defenses) and help assess true team strength.
Recent momentum
last 5 vs previous 5 games.
Changwon LG Sakers
Ulsan Mobis Phoebus
| Period | Avg Points Scored | Avg Points Conceded | Net Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last 5 | 79.4 | 69.4 | +10.0 |
| Previous 5 | 77.6 | 72.8 | +4.8 |
| Period | Avg Points Scored | Avg Points Conceded | Net Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last 5 | 65.2 | 77.6 | -12.4 |
| Previous 5 | 80.2 | 80.8 | -0.6 |
🟢 Green = improving form 📈 ·
🟡 Yellow = neutral ➖ ·
🔴 Red = declining form 📉 —
Momentum analysis shows whether the team has recently been improving in offense and defense, or on the contrary – losing stability.
Changwon LG Sakers
Korea Republic - Korean Basketball League
League Pos.
1 / 10
| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall |
W
W
W
W
L
|
77.13 |
| Home |
W
W
W
W
L
|
75.29 |
| Away |
W
W
W
L
W
|
78.56 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 75.0% | 71.4% | 77.8% |
| Total Points Avg | 148.38 | 143.43 | 152.23 |
| Scored | 77.13 | 75.29 | 78.56 |
| Conceded | 71.25 | 68.14 | 73.67 |
| Pace Avg | 72.62 | 73.80 | 71.71 |
| Off. Rating | 106.44 | 102.31 | 109.73 |
| Def. Rating | 101.40 | 107.76 | 96.83 |
| ATS Cover % | 68.8% | 71.4% | 66.7% |
* Pace is not a value indicator but shows game tempo — higher numbers mean faster play and more possessions.
Ulsan Mobis Phoebus
Korea Republic - Korean Basketball League
League Pos.
9 / 10
| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall |
L
L
L
L
W
|
73.06 |
| Home |
L
L
W
L
L
|
69.75 |
| Away |
L
L
W
L
W
|
76.00 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 35.3% | 25.0% | 44.4% |
| Total Points Avg | 151.06 | 148.5 | 153.33 |
| Scored | 73.06 | 69.75 | 76.00 |
| Conceded | 78.00 | 78.75 | 77.33 |
| Pace Avg | 71.90 | 71.68 | 72.10 |
| Off. Rating | 102.03 | 96.96 | 106.58 |
| Def. Rating | 91.93 | 90.00 | 93.68 |
| ATS Cover % | 23.5% | 25.0% | 22.2% |
* Pace is not a value indicator but shows game tempo — higher numbers mean faster play and more possessions.
Scoring consistency tracker
Last 10 games & full season
Last 3
Last 5
Last 10 ⚠️
Season
Changwon LG Sakers is +6% better in terms of Points Scored
Changwon LG Sakers at Home
Ulsan Mobis Phoebus at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Scored Per Game | Changwon LG Sakers | Ulsan Mobis Phoebus |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 67% | 33% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 33% | 33% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 0% | 33% |
🟢 Green = potential value signal · 🟡 Yellow = needs confirmation · 🔴 Red = caution. Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Ulsan Mobis Phoebus is +3% better in terms of Points Scored
Changwon LG Sakers at Home
Ulsan Mobis Phoebus at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Scored Per Game | Changwon LG Sakers | Ulsan Mobis Phoebus |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 40% | 60% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 40% | 20% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 20% | 20% |
🟢 Green = potential value signal · 🟡 Yellow = needs confirmation · 🔴 Red = caution. Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Ulsan Mobis Phoebus is +1% better in terms of Points Scored
Changwon LG Sakers at Home
Ulsan Mobis Phoebus at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Scored Per Game | Changwon LG Sakers | Ulsan Mobis Phoebus |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 43% | 44% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 29% | 33% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 29% | 22% |
🟢 Green = potential value signal · 🟡 Yellow = needs confirmation · 🔴 Red = caution. Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Ulsan Mobis Phoebus is +1% better in terms of Points Scored
Changwon LG Sakers at Home
Ulsan Mobis Phoebus at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Scored Per Game | Changwon LG Sakers | Ulsan Mobis Phoebus |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 43% | 44% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 29% | 33% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 29% | 22% |
🟢 Green = potential value signal · 🟡 Yellow = needs confirmation · 🔴 Red = caution. Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Offensive Efficiency & Shooting Profile
Where Teams Gain or Lose Value
🟢 Green = strong efficiency or shooting edge · 🟡 Yellow = balanced/average · 🔴 Red = weakness, needs caution. Some stats (like 3P Rate and FT Rate) indicate playing style, not necessarily good or bad — interpret in context.
Possession Control & Rebounding
Assists. Turnovers. Pace
Defensive Consistency vs Season Average
Last 10 & season games
Last 3
Last 5
Last 10 ⚠️
Season
Changwon LG Sakers is +14% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
Changwon LG Sakers at Home
Ulsan Mobis Phoebus at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Conceded Per Game | Changwon LG Sakers | Ulsan Mobis Phoebus |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 0% | 33% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 33% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 100% | 33% |
🟢 Green = strong defensive hold (unders-friendly) · 🟡 Yellow = neutral · 🔴 Red = weak defense (overs risk). Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Changwon LG Sakers is +15% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
Changwon LG Sakers at Home
Ulsan Mobis Phoebus at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Conceded Per Game | Changwon LG Sakers | Ulsan Mobis Phoebus |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 0% | 40% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 40% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 100% | 20% |
🟢 Green = strong defensive hold (unders-friendly) · 🟡 Yellow = neutral · 🔴 Red = weak defense (overs risk). Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Changwon LG Sakers is +12% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
Changwon LG Sakers at Home
Ulsan Mobis Phoebus at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Conceded Per Game | Changwon LG Sakers | Ulsan Mobis Phoebus |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 14% | 22% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 56% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 86% | 22% |
🟢 Green = strong defensive hold (unders-friendly) · 🟡 Yellow = neutral · 🔴 Red = weak defense (overs risk). Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Changwon LG Sakers is +12% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
Changwon LG Sakers at Home
Ulsan Mobis Phoebus at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Conceded Per Game | Changwon LG Sakers | Ulsan Mobis Phoebus |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 14% | 22% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 56% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 86% | 22% |
🟢 Green = strong defensive hold (unders-friendly) · 🟡 Yellow = neutral · 🔴 Red = weak defense (overs risk). Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Defensive Matchup
Edge Style vs Style
🟢 Green = Clear defensive edge (profitable trend) · 🟡 Yellow = Neutral (no big edge) · 🔴 Red = Weak defense / exploitable
Defensive Pressure & Disruption
Who Forces Mistakes?
🟢 Green = Strong edge · 🟡 Yellow = Average · 🔴 Red = Weak edge
* Rate = per 100 possessions. · Others = per game averages.
Total Points Hit-Rate
Scoring trends 10 & seasone games
Last 3
Last 5
Last 10 ⚠️
Season
Over X Points
Under X Points
| Match Points | Changwon LG Sakers | Ulsan Mobis Phoebus | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 120.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Over 130.5 | 86% | 89% | 88% |
| Over 140.5 | 57% | 89% | 75% |
| Over 150.5 | 29% | 67% | 50% |
| Over 160.5 | 14% | 33% | 25% |
| Over 170.5 | 0% | 11% | 6% |
| Over 180.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Changwon LG Sakers | Ulsan Mobis Phoebus | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 120.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Under 130.5 | 14% | 11% | 12% |
| Under 140.5 | 43% | 11% | 25% |
| Under 150.5 | 71% | 33% | 50% |
| Under 160.5 | 86% | 67% | 75% |
| Under 170.5 | 100% | 89% | 94% |
| Under 180.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
🟢 Green = Strong over-trend· 🟡 Yellow = Balanced · 🔴 Red = Weak over-trend
Over X Points
Under X Points
| Match Points | Changwon LG Sakers | Ulsan Mobis Phoebus | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 120.5 | 67% | 67% | 67% |
| Over 130.5 | 67% | 33% | 50% |
| Over 140.5 | 67% | 33% | 50% |
| Over 150.5 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| Over 160.5 | 0% | 33% | 17% |
| Over 170.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Changwon LG Sakers | Ulsan Mobis Phoebus | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 120.5 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| Under 130.5 | 33% | 67% | 50% |
| Under 140.5 | 33% | 67% | 50% |
| Under 150.5 | 67% | 67% | 67% |
| Under 160.5 | 100% | 67% | 83% |
| Under 170.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
🟢 Green = Strong over-trend· 🟡 Yellow = Balanced · 🔴 Red = Weak over-trend
Over X Points
Under X Points
| Match Points | Changwon LG Sakers | Ulsan Mobis Phoebus | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 120.5 | 80% | 80% | 80% |
| Over 130.5 | 80% | 60% | 70% |
| Over 140.5 | 60% | 60% | 60% |
| Over 150.5 | 20% | 60% | 40% |
| Over 160.5 | 0% | 60% | 30% |
| Over 170.5 | 0% | 20% | 10% |
| Over 180.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Changwon LG Sakers | Ulsan Mobis Phoebus | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 120.5 | 20% | 20% | 20% |
| Under 130.5 | 20% | 40% | 30% |
| Under 140.5 | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| Under 150.5 | 80% | 40% | 60% |
| Under 160.5 | 100% | 40% | 70% |
| Under 170.5 | 100% | 80% | 90% |
| Under 180.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
🟢 Green = Strong over-trend· 🟡 Yellow = Balanced · 🔴 Red = Weak over-trend
Over X Points
Under X Points
| Match Points | Changwon LG Sakers | Ulsan Mobis Phoebus | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 120.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Over 130.5 | 86% | 89% | 88% |
| Over 140.5 | 57% | 89% | 75% |
| Over 150.5 | 29% | 67% | 50% |
| Over 160.5 | 14% | 33% | 25% |
| Over 170.5 | 0% | 11% | 6% |
| Over 180.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Changwon LG Sakers | Ulsan Mobis Phoebus | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 120.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Under 130.5 | 14% | 11% | 12% |
| Under 140.5 | 43% | 11% | 25% |
| Under 150.5 | 71% | 33% | 50% |
| Under 160.5 | 86% | 67% | 75% |
| Under 170.5 | 100% | 89% | 94% |
| Under 180.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
🟢 Green = Strong over-trend· 🟡 Yellow = Balanced · 🔴 Red = Weak over-trend
Changwon LG Sakers -
Player Projections
Small sample for some players
Last 5 Games
Last 10 Games
Season
List of OUT players:
Reset all to IN
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Lee Gyeong-do | |||||||||||||
| Choi Hyung-chan | |||||||||||||
| Park In-tae | |||||||||||||
| Lee Gwang-Jin | |||||||||||||
| Kim Jong-ho | |||||||||||||
| Yang Jun-seok | |||||||||||||
| Yu Gi-sang | |||||||||||||
| Park Jeong-hyeon | |||||||||||||
| Jeong In-deok | |||||||||||||
| Doo Kyung-Min | |||||||||||||
| Chang Min kug | |||||||||||||
| Carl Tamayo | |||||||||||||
| Assem Marei | |||||||||||||
| Han Sang-hyeok | |||||||||||||
| Heo Il-Young | |||||||||||||
| Na Seong-ho | |||||||||||||
| Michael Eric | |||||||||||||
| Bae Byeong-jun | |||||||||||||
| Kim Sun-Woo | |||||||||||||
| Kim Jun-Young | |||||||||||||
| Lim Jeong-hyeon | |||||||||||||
| Ji Yong-hyeon | |||||||||||||
| Yoon Won-Sang | |||||||||||||
| Yang Hong-seok |
List of OUT players:
Reset all to IN
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Lee Gyeong-do | |||||||||||||
| Choi Hyung-chan | |||||||||||||
| Park In-tae | |||||||||||||
| Lee Gwang-Jin | |||||||||||||
| Kim Jong-ho | |||||||||||||
| Yang Jun-seok | |||||||||||||
| Yu Gi-sang | |||||||||||||
| Park Jeong-hyeon | |||||||||||||
| Jeong In-deok | |||||||||||||
| Doo Kyung-Min | |||||||||||||
| Chang Min kug | |||||||||||||
| Carl Tamayo | |||||||||||||
| Assem Marei | |||||||||||||
| Han Sang-hyeok | |||||||||||||
| Heo Il-Young | |||||||||||||
| Na Seong-ho | |||||||||||||
| Michael Eric | |||||||||||||
| Bae Byeong-jun | |||||||||||||
| Kim Sun-Woo | |||||||||||||
| Kim Jun-Young | |||||||||||||
| Lim Jeong-hyeon | |||||||||||||
| Ji Yong-hyeon | |||||||||||||
| Yoon Won-Sang | |||||||||||||
| Yang Hong-seok |
List of OUT players:
Reset all to IN
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Lee Gyeong-do | |||||||||||||
| Choi Hyung-chan | |||||||||||||
| Park In-tae | |||||||||||||
| Lee Gwang-Jin | |||||||||||||
| Kim Jong-ho | |||||||||||||
| Yang Jun-seok | |||||||||||||
| Yu Gi-sang | |||||||||||||
| Park Jeong-hyeon | |||||||||||||
| Jeong In-deok | |||||||||||||
| Doo Kyung-Min | |||||||||||||
| Chang Min kug | |||||||||||||
| Carl Tamayo | |||||||||||||
| Assem Marei | |||||||||||||
| Han Sang-hyeok | |||||||||||||
| Heo Il-Young | |||||||||||||
| Na Seong-ho | |||||||||||||
| Michael Eric | |||||||||||||
| Bae Byeong-jun | |||||||||||||
| Kim Sun-Woo | |||||||||||||
| Kim Jun-Young | |||||||||||||
| Lim Jeong-hyeon | |||||||||||||
| Ji Yong-hyeon | |||||||||||||
| Yoon Won-Sang | |||||||||||||
| Yang Hong-seok |
* Colored values are our “value check” candidates. Always compare with market lines before deciding.
Ulsan Mobis Phoebus -
Player Projections
Small sample for some players
Last 5 Games
Last 10 Games
Season
OUT Players
Reset all to IN
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Park Jun-Hyung | |||||||||||||
| Lee Dae-Kyun | |||||||||||||
| Kang Hyun-soo | |||||||||||||
| Kim Dong-Jun | |||||||||||||
| Lee Dae-Heon | |||||||||||||
| Kim Geun-Hyun | |||||||||||||
| Lee Do-Heon | |||||||||||||
| Lee Woo-jung | |||||||||||||
| Jeong Joon-Won | |||||||||||||
| Lee Seung-Hyun | |||||||||||||
| Jeon Jun-Beom | |||||||||||||
| Jo Han-jin | |||||||||||||
| Ham Ji-hoon | |||||||||||||
| Miguel Andre Oczon | |||||||||||||
| Bak Jun-is | |||||||||||||
| Seo Myeon-gjin | |||||||||||||
| Park Mu-bin | |||||||||||||
| Lee Seung-woo | |||||||||||||
| Eric Romero | |||||||||||||
| Rayshaun Hammonds | |||||||||||||
| Kim Geon-ha | |||||||||||||
| Park Jeong-hwan | |||||||||||||
| Kim Tae-Hun |
OUT Players
Reset all to IN
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Park Jun-Hyung | |||||||||||||
| Lee Dae-Kyun | |||||||||||||
| Kang Hyun-soo | |||||||||||||
| Kim Dong-Jun | |||||||||||||
| Lee Dae-Heon | |||||||||||||
| Kim Geun-Hyun | |||||||||||||
| Lee Do-Heon | |||||||||||||
| Lee Woo-jung | |||||||||||||
| Jeong Joon-Won | |||||||||||||
| Lee Seung-Hyun | |||||||||||||
| Jeon Jun-Beom | |||||||||||||
| Jo Han-jin | |||||||||||||
| Ham Ji-hoon | |||||||||||||
| Miguel Andre Oczon | |||||||||||||
| Bak Jun-is | |||||||||||||
| Seo Myeon-gjin | |||||||||||||
| Park Mu-bin | |||||||||||||
| Lee Seung-woo | |||||||||||||
| Eric Romero | |||||||||||||
| Rayshaun Hammonds | |||||||||||||
| Kim Geon-ha | |||||||||||||
| Park Jeong-hwan | |||||||||||||
| Kim Tae-Hun |
OUT Players
Reset all to IN
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Park Jun-Hyung | |||||||||||||
| Lee Dae-Kyun | |||||||||||||
| Kang Hyun-soo | |||||||||||||
| Kim Dong-Jun | |||||||||||||
| Lee Dae-Heon | |||||||||||||
| Kim Geun-Hyun | |||||||||||||
| Lee Do-Heon | |||||||||||||
| Lee Woo-jung | |||||||||||||
| Jeong Joon-Won | |||||||||||||
| Lee Seung-Hyun | |||||||||||||
| Jeon Jun-Beom | |||||||||||||
| Jo Han-jin | |||||||||||||
| Ham Ji-hoon | |||||||||||||
| Miguel Andre Oczon | |||||||||||||
| Bak Jun-is | |||||||||||||
| Seo Myeon-gjin | |||||||||||||
| Park Mu-bin | |||||||||||||
| Lee Seung-woo | |||||||||||||
| Eric Romero | |||||||||||||
| Rayshaun Hammonds | |||||||||||||
| Kim Geon-ha | |||||||||||||
| Park Jeong-hwan | |||||||||||||
| Kim Tae-Hun |
* Colored values are our “value check” candidates. Always compare with market lines before deciding.
Roasters & Injured Players
Changwon LG Sakers
Ulsan Mobis Phoebus
Roasters
Injured
No injured players listed for either team.
| # | Team | W | L | PCT | PPG | OPP PPG | DIFF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Changwon LG Sakers | 12 | 4 | 0.750 | 77.1 | 71.3 | - |
| 2 | Anyang JungKwanJang Red Boosters | 10 | 6 | 0.625 | 74.3 | 68.9 | - |
| 3 | Wonju Dongbu Promy | 10 | 7 | 0.588 | 78.4 | 77.3 | - |
| 4 | Buasn KCC Egis | 9 | 7 | 0.562 | 76.1 | 77.6 | - |
| 5 | Seoul SK Knights | 9 | 8 | 0.529 | 79.2 | 75.1 | - |
| 6 | Suwon KT Sonicboom | 9 | 8 | 0.529 | 72.3 | 76.4 | - |
| 7 | Seoul Samsung Thunders | 7 | 10 | 0.412 | 80.5 | 81.2 | - |
| 8 | Goyang Sono Skygunners | 7 | 10 | 0.412 | 76.3 | 75.8 | - |
| 9 | Ulsan Mobis Phoebus | 6 | 11 | 0.353 | 73.1 | 78.0 | - |
| 10 | Daegu KOGAS Pegasus | 4 | 12 | 0.250 | 74.3 | 79.7 | - |
Monthly & Opponent Breakdown (How to Use)
Compares a team/player’s overall averages to their performance vs a specific opponent.
Why it’s useful:
Betting use:
Game Outcome Summary (How to Use)