90.00
W W W L W
Gimle
Norway flag
Norway
Saturday Nov 22, 2025 - 10:00 (America/New_York)
Gimle vs Kongsberg Miners
Stats, H2H, Live Scores & xG
91.17
W W W L L
Kongsberg Miners

Scoring Intelligence Panel

Gimle vs Kongsberg Miners
How to use
N/A
Possessions / Game
League Average: N/A
171
Points / Match
League Average: 171
11.7
( Medium )
Volatility
League Average: 12.9
🟢 Green = favorable situation (high pace, strong over trend, or very stable totals) ✅ · ⚪ Gray = neutral, close to league average 👌 · 🟡 Yellow / 🟠 Orange = warning, results can swing more than usual ⚠️ · 🔴 Red = unfavorable / high risk (low pace for overs, strong under lean, or very volatile games) ❌

Head to Head Statistics

Gimle vs Kongsberg Miners
All Time
Last 3 Games
30
Matches
13 Wins
17 Wins
47% Over 161.5
14 / 30
50% Over 171.5
15 / 30
3% Over 181.5
1 / 30
🟢 Green = value ✅ · 🟡 Yellow = risky ⚠️ · 🔴 Red = skip ❌
3
Matches
0 Wins
3 Wins
67% Over 161.5
2 / 3
33% Over 171.5
1 / 3
0% Over 181.5
0 / 3
🟢 Green = value ✅ · 🟡 Yellow = risky ⚠️ · 🔴 Red = skip ❌

Scoring Momentum (Recent Form)

How to use
Metric Gimle Kongsberg Miners
Average Total Points (Last 5 Games) 163.60 166.80
Previous 5 Avg 186.40 174.60
Trend Line (Last 5 Games) 175, 178, 154, 151, 160 183, 163, 147, 164, 177
🟢 Green = value ✅ · 🟡 Yellow = risky ⚠️ · 🔴 Red = skip ❌

Team performance vs top opponents

scoring, conceding, and net rating.
How to use
Metric Gimle Kongsberg Miners
Avg Pts vs Top 5 Def 91.3 84.0
Avg Pts Conceded vs Top 5 Off 85.5 84.4
Net Rating vs Top 5 Opps 0.0 0.0
🟢 Green = value ✅ · 🟡 Yellow = risky ⚠️ · 🔴 Red = skip ❌ — Values are compared to the team's own season average. These indicators reflect performance against top opponents (TOP 5 offenses and defenses) and help assess true team strength.

Recent momentum

last 5 vs previous 5 games.
How to use
Gimle
Kongsberg Miners
Period Avg Points Scored Avg Points Conceded Net Change
Last 5 86.0 80.4 +5.6
Previous 5 98.4 78.8 +19.6
Period Avg Points Scored Avg Points Conceded Net Change
Last 5 88.4 77.8 +10.6
Previous 5 92.2 82.2 +10.0
🟢 Green = improving form 📈 · 🟡 Yellow = neutral ➖ · 🔴 Red = declining form 📉 — Momentum analysis shows whether the team has recently been improving in offense and defense, or on the contrary – losing stability.
Form Results PPG
Overall
W W W W W
94.36
Home
W W W L W
90.00
Away
W W W W W
98.00
Stats Overall Home Away
Win % 81.8% 80.0% 83.3%
Total Points Avg 174.27 172.8 175.5
Scored 94.36 90.00 98.00
Conceded 79.91 82.80 77.50
Pace Avg 0 0 0
Off. Rating 0 0 0
Def. Rating 0 0 0
ATS Cover % 0% 0% 0%
* Pace is not a value indicator but shows game tempo — higher numbers mean faster play and more possessions.
Form Results PPG
Overall
W W W W W
92.83
Home
W W W W W
94.50
Away
W W W L L
91.17
Stats Overall Home Away
Win % 83.3% 100.0% 66.7%
Total Points Avg 168.5 166 171
Scored 92.83 94.50 91.17
Conceded 75.67 71.50 79.83
Pace Avg 0 0 0
Off. Rating 0 0 0
Def. Rating 0 0 0
ATS Cover % 0% 0% 0%
* Pace is not a value indicator but shows game tempo — higher numbers mean faster play and more possessions.

Scoring consistency tracker

Last 10 games & full season
How to use
Last 3
Last 5
Last 10 ⚠️
Season

Kongsberg Miners is +14% better in terms of Points Scored

Gimle Gimle at Home
Avg. team scoring home 81 points
Kongsberg Miners Kongsberg Miners at Away
Avg. team scoring away 93 points
Full-Time
Quarters
Scored Per Game Gimle Kongsberg Miners
% Above Avg (+5%) 0% 67%
% Around Avg (±5%) 33% 33%
% Well below Avg (-5%) 67% 0%
Scored Quarters Gimle Kongsberg Miners
Scored Average Q1
Scored Average Q2
Scored Average Q3
Scored Average Q4
🟢 Green = potential value signal · 🟡 Yellow = needs confirmation · 🔴 Red = caution. Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.

Gimle is +3% better in terms of Points Scored

Gimle Gimle at Home
Avg. team scoring home 90 points
Kongsberg Miners Kongsberg Miners at Away
Avg. team scoring away 87 points
Full-Time
Quarters
Scored Per Game Gimle Kongsberg Miners
% Above Avg (+5%) 40% 60%
% Around Avg (±5%) 20% 20%
% Well below Avg (-5%) 40% 20%
Scored Quarters Gimle Kongsberg Miners
Scored Average Q1
Scored Average Q2
Scored Average Q3
Scored Average Q4
🟢 Green = potential value signal · 🟡 Yellow = needs confirmation · 🔴 Red = caution. Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.

Kongsberg Miners is +1% better in terms of Points Scored

Gimle Gimle at Home
Avg. team scoring home 90 points
Kongsberg Miners Kongsberg Miners at Away
Avg. team scoring away 91 points
Full-Time
Quarters
Scored Per Game Gimle Kongsberg Miners
% Above Avg (+5%) 40% 67%
% Around Avg (±5%) 20% 17%
% Well below Avg (-5%) 40% 17%
Scored Quarters Gimle Kongsberg Miners
Scored Average Q1
Scored Average Q2
Scored Average Q3
Scored Average Q4
🟢 Green = potential value signal · 🟡 Yellow = needs confirmation · 🔴 Red = caution. Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.

Kongsberg Miners is +1% better in terms of Points Scored

Gimle Gimle at Home
Avg. team scoring home 90 points
Kongsberg Miners Kongsberg Miners at Away
Avg. team scoring away 91 points
Full-Time
Quarters
Scored Per Game Gimle Kongsberg Miners
% Above Avg (+5%) 40% 67%
% Around Avg (±5%) 20% 17%
% Well below Avg (-5%) 40% 17%
Scored Quarters Gimle Kongsberg Miners
Scored Average Q1
Scored Average Q2
Scored Average Q3
Scored Average Q4
🟢 Green = potential value signal · 🟡 Yellow = needs confirmation · 🔴 Red = caution. Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.

Offensive Efficiency & Shooting Profile

Where Teams Gain or Lose Value
Efficiency & Shooting Gimle Kongsberg Miners
FG
2 Points (2P)
3 Points (3P)
Free Throw
Efficient FG
3P Average Rate
Free Throw Rate
Offensive Rating
🟢 Green = strong efficiency or shooting edge · 🟡 Yellow = balanced/average · 🔴 Red = weakness, needs caution. Some stats (like 3P Rate and FT Rate) indicate playing style, not necessarily good or bad — interpret in context.

Possession Control & Rebounding

Assists. Turnovers. Pace
Control & Rebounding Gimle Kongsberg Miners
Assists/Game
Assist Rate
Turnovers/Game
Turnover Rate (TOV%)
Offensive Rebound
Pace
Possessions
🟢 Green = strong edge · 🟡 Yellow = neutral/needs context · 🔴 Red = weakness/avoid

Defensive Consistency vs Season Average

Last 10 & season games
How to use
Last 3
Last 5
Last 10 ⚠️
Season

Kongsberg Miners is +3% better defensively (fewer points conceded)

Gimle Gimle at Home
Avg. team conceded home 79 points
Kongsberg Miners Kongsberg Miners at Away
Avg. team conceded away 76 points
Full-Time
Quarters
Conceded Per Game Gimle Kongsberg Miners
% Below Avg (-5%) 0% 0%
% Around Avg (±5%) 33% 33%
% Well Above Avg (+7%) 67% 67%
Conceded by Quarter Gimle Kongsberg Miners
Q1 Conceded Avg
Q2 Conceded Avg
Q3 Conceded Avg
Q4 Conceded Avg
🟢 Green = strong defensive hold (unders-friendly) · 🟡 Yellow = neutral · 🔴 Red = weak defense (overs risk). Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.

Kongsberg Miners is +1% better defensively (fewer points conceded)

Gimle Gimle at Home
Avg. team conceded home 83 points
Kongsberg Miners Kongsberg Miners at Away
Avg. team conceded away 82 points
Full-Time
Quarters
Conceded Per Game Gimle Kongsberg Miners
% Below Avg (-5%) 20% 20%
% Around Avg (±5%) 20% 40%
% Well Above Avg (+7%) 60% 40%
Conceded by Quarter Gimle Kongsberg Miners
Q1 Conceded Avg
Q2 Conceded Avg
Q3 Conceded Avg
Q4 Conceded Avg
🟢 Green = strong defensive hold (unders-friendly) · 🟡 Yellow = neutral · 🔴 Red = weak defense (overs risk). Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.

Kongsberg Miners is +4% better defensively (fewer points conceded)

Gimle Gimle at Home
Avg. team conceded home 83 points
Kongsberg Miners Kongsberg Miners at Away
Avg. team conceded away 80 points
Full-Time
Quarters
Conceded Per Game Gimle Kongsberg Miners
% Below Avg (-5%) 20% 17%
% Around Avg (±5%) 20% 33%
% Well Above Avg (+7%) 60% 50%
Conceded by Quarter Gimle Kongsberg Miners
Q1 Conceded Avg
Q2 Conceded Avg
Q3 Conceded Avg
Q4 Conceded Avg
🟢 Green = strong defensive hold (unders-friendly) · 🟡 Yellow = neutral · 🔴 Red = weak defense (overs risk). Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.

Kongsberg Miners is +4% better defensively (fewer points conceded)

Gimle Gimle at Home
Avg. team conceded home 83 points
Kongsberg Miners Kongsberg Miners at Away
Avg. team conceded away 80 points
Full-Time
Quarters
Conceded Per Game Gimle Kongsberg Miners
% Below Avg (-5%) 20% 17%
% Around Avg (±5%) 20% 33%
% Well Above Avg (+7%) 60% 50%
Conceded by Quarter Gimle Kongsberg Miners
Q1 Conceded Avg
Q2 Conceded Avg
Q3 Conceded Avg
Q4 Conceded Avg
🟢 Green = strong defensive hold (unders-friendly) · 🟡 Yellow = neutral · 🔴 Red = weak defense (overs risk). Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.

Defensive Matchup

Edge Style vs Style
Efficiency & Shot Profile Gimle Kongsberg Miners
Defensive Rating
Opp FG%
Opp 2PT%
Opp 3PT%
Opp EFG%
3PT Attempt Rate Allowed
Free Throw Rate Allowed
Defensive Rebound %
🟢 Green = Clear defensive edge (profitable trend) · 🟡 Yellow = Neutral (no big edge) · 🔴 Red = Weak defense / exploitable

Defensive Pressure & Disruption

Who Forces Mistakes?
Pressure & Disruption Gimle Kongsberg Miners
Forced Turnover Rate
Steal Rate
Block Rate
Steals/Game
Turnovers Forced/Game
🟢 Green = Strong edge · 🟡 Yellow = Average · 🔴 Red = Weak edge
* Rate = per 100 possessions. · Others = per game averages.

Total Points Hit-Rate

Scoring trends 10 & seasone games
Last 3
Last 5
Last 10 ⚠️
Season
Over X Points
Under X Points
Match Points Gimle Kongsberg Miners Average
Over 140.5 100% 100% 100%
Over 150.5 100% 83% 91%
Over 160.5 60% 67% 64%
Over 170.5 60% 67% 64%
Over 180.5 40% 33% 36%
Over 190.5 20% 0% 9%
Over 200.5 0% 0% 0%
Match Points Gimle Kongsberg Miners Average
Under 140.5 0% 0% 0%
Under 150.5 0% 17% 9%
Under 160.5 40% 33% 36%
Under 170.5 40% 33% 36%
Under 180.5 60% 67% 64%
Under 190.5 80% 100% 91%
Under 200.5 100% 100% 100%
🟢 Green = Strong over-trend· 🟡 Yellow = Balanced · 🔴 Red = Weak over-trend
Over X Points
Under X Points
Match Points Gimle Kongsberg Miners Average
Over 140.5 67% 67% 67%
Over 150.5 67% 33% 50%
Over 160.5 33% 33% 33%
Over 170.5 33% 33% 33%
Over 180.5 0% 33% 17%
Over 190.5 0% 0% 0%
Match Points Gimle Kongsberg Miners Average
Under 140.5 33% 33% 33%
Under 150.5 33% 67% 50%
Under 160.5 67% 67% 67%
Under 170.5 67% 67% 67%
Under 180.5 100% 67% 83%
Under 190.5 100% 100% 100%
🟢 Green = Strong over-trend· 🟡 Yellow = Balanced · 🔴 Red = Weak over-trend
Over X Points
Under X Points
Match Points Gimle Kongsberg Miners Average
Over 140.5 80% 80% 80%
Over 150.5 80% 60% 70%
Over 160.5 40% 60% 50%
Over 170.5 40% 60% 50%
Over 180.5 20% 40% 30%
Over 190.5 20% 0% 10%
Over 200.5 0% 0% 0%
Match Points Gimle Kongsberg Miners Average
Under 140.5 20% 20% 20%
Under 150.5 20% 40% 30%
Under 160.5 60% 40% 50%
Under 170.5 60% 40% 50%
Under 180.5 80% 60% 70%
Under 190.5 80% 100% 90%
Under 200.5 100% 100% 100%
🟢 Green = Strong over-trend· 🟡 Yellow = Balanced · 🔴 Red = Weak over-trend
Over X Points
Under X Points
Match Points Gimle Kongsberg Miners Average
Over 140.5 100% 100% 100%
Over 150.5 100% 83% 91%
Over 160.5 60% 67% 64%
Over 170.5 60% 67% 64%
Over 180.5 40% 33% 36%
Over 190.5 20% 0% 9%
Over 200.5 0% 0% 0%
Match Points Gimle Kongsberg Miners Average
Under 140.5 0% 0% 0%
Under 150.5 0% 17% 9%
Under 160.5 40% 33% 36%
Under 170.5 40% 33% 36%
Under 180.5 60% 67% 64%
Under 190.5 80% 100% 91%
Under 200.5 100% 100% 100%
🟢 Green = Strong over-trend· 🟡 Yellow = Balanced · 🔴 Red = Weak over-trend
# Team W L PCT PPG OPP PPG DIFF
1 Fyllingen 10 3 0.769 92.6 79.0 -
2 Kongsberg Miners 10 3 0.769 93.1 75.5 -
3 Centrum Tigers 9 4 0.692 90.6 79.3 -
4 Gimle 9 2 0.818 95.9 80.5 -
5 Frøya Ambassadors 9 4 0.692 90.2 76.3 -
6 Baerum Basket 6 5 0.545 85.4 86.3 -
7 Nidaros Jets 3 11 0.214 79.1 98.3 -
8 Asker Aliens 2 9 0.182 72.1 96.0 -
9 Ammerud 2 11 0.154 80.8 93.5 -
10 TNT Towers 2 10 0.167 76.6 92.9 -