Scoring Intelligence Panel
Gravelines Dunkerque vs Limoges
Head to Head Statistics
Gravelines Dunkerque vs Limoges
Scoring Momentum (Recent Form)
| Metric | Gravelines Dunkerque | Limoges |
|---|---|---|
| Average Total Points (Last 5 Games) | 173.20 | 164.00 |
| Previous 5 Avg | 0 | 0 |
| Trend Line (Last 5 Games) | 192, 164, 145, 179, 186 | 146, 208, 171, 153, 142 |
Team performance vs top opponents
scoring, conceding, and net rating.
| Metric | Gravelines Dunkerque | Limoges |
|---|---|---|
| Avg Pts vs Top 5 Def | 70.5 | 77.0 |
| Avg Pts Conceded vs Top 5 Off | 92.0 | 86.0 |
| Net Rating vs Top 5 Opps | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Recent momentum
last 5 vs previous 5 games.
| Period | Avg Points Scored | Avg Points Conceded | Net Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last 5 | 82.2 | 91.0 | -8.8 |
| Period | Avg Points Scored | Avg Points Conceded | Net Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last 5 | 77.8 | 86.2 | -8.4 |
Gravelines Dunkerque
France - Ligue Nationale de Basket Pro A
League Pos.
15 / 16
| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall |
L
L
L
W
W
|
79.00 |
| Home |
L
W
L
L
|
79.00 |
| Away |
L
L
W
L
L
|
79.00 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 22.2% | 25.0% | 20.0% |
| Total Points Avg | 172.11 | 168.5 | 175 |
| Scored | 79.00 | 79.00 | 79.00 |
| Conceded | 93.11 | 89.50 | 96.00 |
| Pace Avg | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Off. Rating | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Def. Rating | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ATS Cover % | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Limoges
France - Ligue Nationale de Basket Pro A
League Pos.
11 / 16
| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall |
L
L
L
L
W
|
82.11 |
| Home |
L
L
L
W
W
|
78.67 |
| Away |
L
L
L
|
89.00 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 33.3% | 50.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Points Avg | 170.89 | 158 | 196.67 |
| Scored | 82.11 | 78.67 | 89.00 |
| Conceded | 88.78 | 79.33 | 107.67 |
| Pace Avg | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Off. Rating | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Def. Rating | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ATS Cover % | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Scoring consistency tracker
Last 10 games & full season
Limoges is +7% better in terms of Points Scored
| Scored Per Game | Gravelines Dunkerque | Limoges |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 33% | 67% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 33% | 33% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 33% | 0% |
Limoges is +13% better in terms of Points Scored
| Scored Per Game | Gravelines Dunkerque | Limoges |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 25% | 67% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 25% | 33% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 50% | 0% |
Limoges is +13% better in terms of Points Scored
| Scored Per Game | Gravelines Dunkerque | Limoges |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 25% | 67% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 25% | 33% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 50% | 0% |
Limoges is +13% better in terms of Points Scored
| Scored Per Game | Gravelines Dunkerque | Limoges |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 25% | 67% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 25% | 33% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 50% | 0% |
Offensive Efficiency & Shooting Profile
Where Teams Gain or Lose Value
Possession Control & Rebounding
Assists. Turnovers. Pace
Defensive Consistency vs Season Average
Last 10 & season games
Gravelines Dunkerque is +23% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
| Conceded Per Game | Gravelines Dunkerque | Limoges |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 0% | 100% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 67% | 0% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 33% | 0% |
Gravelines Dunkerque is +17% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
| Conceded Per Game | Gravelines Dunkerque | Limoges |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 25% | 100% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 50% | 0% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 25% | 0% |
Gravelines Dunkerque is +17% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
| Conceded Per Game | Gravelines Dunkerque | Limoges |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 25% | 100% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 50% | 0% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 25% | 0% |
Gravelines Dunkerque is +17% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
| Conceded Per Game | Gravelines Dunkerque | Limoges |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 25% | 100% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 50% | 0% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 25% | 0% |
Defensive Matchup
Edge Style vs Style
Defensive Pressure & Disruption
Who Forces Mistakes?
Total Points Hit-Rate
Scoring trends 10 & seasone games
| Match Points | Gravelines Dunkerque | Limoges | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 140.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Over 150.5 | 75% | 100% | 86% |
| Over 160.5 | 75% | 100% | 86% |
| Over 170.5 | 50% | 100% | 71% |
| Over 180.5 | 25% | 67% | 43% |
| Over 190.5 | 0% | 67% | 29% |
| Over 200.5 | 0% | 67% | 29% |
| Over 210.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Gravelines Dunkerque | Limoges | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 140.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Under 150.5 | 25% | 0% | 14% |
| Under 160.5 | 25% | 0% | 14% |
| Under 170.5 | 50% | 0% | 29% |
| Under 180.5 | 75% | 33% | 57% |
| Under 190.5 | 100% | 33% | 71% |
| Under 200.5 | 100% | 33% | 71% |
| Under 210.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Match Points | Gravelines Dunkerque | Limoges | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 140.5 | 67% | 67% | 67% |
| Over 150.5 | 33% | 67% | 50% |
| Over 160.5 | 33% | 67% | 50% |
| Over 170.5 | 33% | 67% | 50% |
| Over 180.5 | 33% | 67% | 50% |
| Over 190.5 | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| Over 200.5 | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| Over 210.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Gravelines Dunkerque | Limoges | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 140.5 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| Under 150.5 | 67% | 33% | 50% |
| Under 160.5 | 67% | 33% | 50% |
| Under 170.5 | 67% | 33% | 50% |
| Under 180.5 | 67% | 33% | 50% |
| Under 190.5 | 100% | 33% | 67% |
| Under 200.5 | 100% | 33% | 67% |
| Under 210.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Match Points | Gravelines Dunkerque | Limoges | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 140.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Over 150.5 | 75% | 100% | 86% |
| Over 160.5 | 75% | 100% | 86% |
| Over 170.5 | 50% | 100% | 71% |
| Over 180.5 | 25% | 67% | 43% |
| Over 190.5 | 0% | 67% | 29% |
| Over 200.5 | 0% | 67% | 29% |
| Over 210.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Gravelines Dunkerque | Limoges | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 140.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Under 150.5 | 25% | 0% | 14% |
| Under 160.5 | 25% | 0% | 14% |
| Under 170.5 | 50% | 0% | 29% |
| Under 180.5 | 75% | 33% | 57% |
| Under 190.5 | 100% | 33% | 71% |
| Under 200.5 | 100% | 33% | 71% |
| Under 210.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Match Points | Gravelines Dunkerque | Limoges | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 140.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Over 150.5 | 75% | 100% | 86% |
| Over 160.5 | 75% | 100% | 86% |
| Over 170.5 | 50% | 100% | 71% |
| Over 180.5 | 25% | 67% | 43% |
| Over 190.5 | 0% | 67% | 29% |
| Over 200.5 | 0% | 67% | 29% |
| Over 210.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Gravelines Dunkerque | Limoges | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 140.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Under 150.5 | 25% | 0% | 14% |
| Under 160.5 | 25% | 0% | 14% |
| Under 170.5 | 50% | 0% | 29% |
| Under 180.5 | 75% | 33% | 57% |
| Under 190.5 | 100% | 33% | 71% |
| Under 200.5 | 100% | 33% | 71% |
| Under 210.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Gravelines Dunkerque -
Player Projections
Small sample for some players
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Hugo Boumpoutou | |||||||||||||
| Roman Domon | |||||||||||||
| Evan Boisdur | |||||||||||||
| tajuan agee | |||||||||||||
| Valentin Chery | |||||||||||||
| Thomas Cornely | |||||||||||||
| Chris Babb |
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Hugo Boumpoutou | |||||||||||||
| Roman Domon | |||||||||||||
| Evan Boisdur | |||||||||||||
| tajuan agee | |||||||||||||
| Valentin Chery | |||||||||||||
| Thomas Cornely | |||||||||||||
| Chris Babb |
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Hugo Boumpoutou | |||||||||||||
| Roman Domon | |||||||||||||
| Evan Boisdur | |||||||||||||
| tajuan agee | |||||||||||||
| Valentin Chery | |||||||||||||
| Thomas Cornely | |||||||||||||
| Chris Babb |
Limoges -
Player Projections
Small sample for some players
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Mamadou Guisse | |||||||||||||
| Vincent Amsellem | |||||||||||||
| Trevon Bluiett | |||||||||||||
| William Christmas | |||||||||||||
| Kenny Courset | |||||||||||||
| Nicolas Derammelaere | |||||||||||||
| Mohamed Diarra | |||||||||||||
| Noam Masdieu Reynaert | |||||||||||||
| Malik Osborne | |||||||||||||
| Dorian Rinaldo-Komlan | |||||||||||||
| Tyrell Terry | |||||||||||||
| Kenny Baptiste | |||||||||||||
| Alexandre Bouzidi | |||||||||||||
| Lucas Beaufort | |||||||||||||
| Alexandre Chassang | |||||||||||||
| Nicolas Lang |
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Mamadou Guisse | |||||||||||||
| Vincent Amsellem | |||||||||||||
| Trevon Bluiett | |||||||||||||
| William Christmas | |||||||||||||
| Kenny Courset | |||||||||||||
| Nicolas Derammelaere | |||||||||||||
| Mohamed Diarra | |||||||||||||
| Noam Masdieu Reynaert | |||||||||||||
| Malik Osborne | |||||||||||||
| Dorian Rinaldo-Komlan | |||||||||||||
| Tyrell Terry | |||||||||||||
| Kenny Baptiste | |||||||||||||
| Alexandre Bouzidi | |||||||||||||
| Lucas Beaufort | |||||||||||||
| Alexandre Chassang | |||||||||||||
| Nicolas Lang |
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Mamadou Guisse | |||||||||||||
| Vincent Amsellem | |||||||||||||
| Trevon Bluiett | |||||||||||||
| William Christmas | |||||||||||||
| Kenny Courset | |||||||||||||
| Nicolas Derammelaere | |||||||||||||
| Mohamed Diarra | |||||||||||||
| Noam Masdieu Reynaert | |||||||||||||
| Malik Osborne | |||||||||||||
| Dorian Rinaldo-Komlan | |||||||||||||
| Tyrell Terry | |||||||||||||
| Kenny Baptiste | |||||||||||||
| Alexandre Bouzidi | |||||||||||||
| Lucas Beaufort | |||||||||||||
| Alexandre Chassang | |||||||||||||
| Nicolas Lang |
Roasters & Injured Players
| # | Team | W | L | PCT | PPG | OPP PPG | DIFF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Strasbourg | 7 | 2 | 0.778 | 82.8 | 80.2 | - |
| 2 | Monaco | 7 | 2 | 0.778 | 93.8 | 86.7 | - |
| 3 | Lyon Asvel Villeurbanne | 7 | 2 | 0.778 | 88.3 | 75.7 | - |
| 4 | Nanterre | 7 | 2 | 0.778 | 84.2 | 77.7 | - |
| 5 | Paris Basketball | 6 | 2 | 0.750 | 99.5 | 82.5 | - |
| 6 | Le Mans Sarthe | 6 | 3 | 0.667 | 84.6 | 83.6 | - |
| 7 | JL Bourg-en-Bresse | 5 | 4 | 0.556 | 88.8 | 84.6 | - |
| 8 | Chalon/SaÔne | 5 | 4 | 0.556 | 82.7 | 87.1 | - |
| 9 | Nancy | 4 | 5 | 0.444 | 85.2 | 87.0 | - |
| 10 | Cholet | 4 | 5 | 0.444 | 83.3 | 80.8 | - |
| 11 | Limoges | 3 | 6 | 0.333 | 82.1 | 88.8 | - |
| 12 | JDA Dijon | 3 | 6 | 0.333 | 85.8 | 86.7 | - |
| 13 | Boulazac | 3 | 7 | 0.300 | 79.8 | 82.9 | - |
| 14 | Saint Quentin | 2 | 7 | 0.222 | 75.6 | 82.9 | - |
| 15 | Gravelines Dunkerque | 2 | 7 | 0.222 | 79.0 | 93.1 | - |
| 16 | Le Portel | 1 | 8 | 0.111 | 74.6 | 87.7 | - |