82.25
W
W
W
L
Hogsbo Women
Sweden
Sunday Nov 30, 2025 - 09:00 (America/New_York)
Hogsbo Women vs IK Eos Women
Stats, H2H, Live Scores & xG
67.40
L
L
L
L
L
IK Eos Women
Note: The current season has recently started, and one or both teams have played fewer than 5 matches.
Scoring Intelligence Panel
Hogsbo Women vs IK Eos Women
N/A
Possessions / Game
League Average: N/A
151
Points / Match
League Average: 151
19
( High )
Volatility
League Average: 10.1
🟢 Green = favorable situation (high pace, strong over trend, or very stable totals) ✅ ·
⚪ Gray = neutral, close to league average 👌 ·
🟡 Yellow / 🟠 Orange = warning, results can swing more than usual ⚠️ ·
🔴 Red = unfavorable / high risk (low pace for overs, strong under lean, or very volatile games) ❌
Head to Head Statistics
Hogsbo Women vs IK Eos Women
All Time
Last 3 Games
38%
Over 141.5
5 / 13
38%
Over 151.5
5 / 13
23%
Over 161.5
3 / 13
🟢 Green = value ✅ ·
🟡 Yellow = risky ⚠️ ·
🔴 Red = skip ❌
0%
Over 141.5
0 / 3
0%
Over 151.5
0 / 3
100%
Over 161.5
3 / 3
🟢 Green = value ✅ ·
🟡 Yellow = risky ⚠️ ·
🔴 Red = skip ❌
Scoring Momentum (Recent Form)
| Metric | Hogsbo Women | IK Eos Women |
|---|---|---|
| Average Total Points (Last 5 Games) | 148.00 | 143.60 |
| Previous 5 Avg | 161.60 | 0 |
| Trend Line (Last 5 Games) | 131, 114, 175, 150, 170 | 142, 130, 145, 171, 130 |
🟢 Green = value ✅ ·
🟡 Yellow = risky ⚠️ ·
🔴 Red = skip ❌
Team performance vs top opponents
scoring, conceding, and net rating.
| Metric | Hogsbo Women | IK Eos Women |
|---|---|---|
| Avg Pts vs Top 5 Def | 80.8 | 72.0 |
| Avg Pts Conceded vs Top 5 Off | 86.3 | 80.8 |
| Net Rating vs Top 5 Opps | 0.0 | 0.0 |
🟢 Green = value ✅ ·
🟡 Yellow = risky ⚠️ ·
🔴 Red = skip ❌ —
Values are compared to the team's own season average.
These indicators reflect performance against top opponents (TOP 5 offenses and defenses) and help assess true team strength.
Recent momentum
last 5 vs previous 5 games.
Hogsbo Women
IK Eos Women
| Period | Avg Points Scored | Avg Points Conceded | Net Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last 5 | 80.0 | 69.6 | +10.4 |
| Previous 5 | 89.8 | 70.4 | +19.4 |
| Period | Avg Points Scored | Avg Points Conceded | Net Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last 5 | 72.4 | 80.8 | -8.4 |
🟢 Green = improving form 📈 ·
🟡 Yellow = neutral ➖ ·
🔴 Red = declining form 📉 —
Momentum analysis shows whether the team has recently been improving in offense and defense, or on the contrary – losing stability.
Hogsbo Women
Sweden - Svenska Basketligan Dam
League Pos.
3 / 13
| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall |
W
W
L
L
W
|
84.00 |
| Home |
W
W
W
L
|
82.25 |
| Away |
L
L
W
W
W
|
85.17 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 60.0% | 75.0% | 50.0% |
| Total Points Avg | 154.8 | 146.75 | 160.17 |
| Scored | 84.00 | 82.25 | 85.17 |
| Conceded | 70.80 | 64.50 | 75.00 |
| Pace Avg | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Off. Rating | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Def. Rating | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ATS Cover % | 0% | 0% | 0% |
* Pace is not a value indicator but shows game tempo — higher numbers mean faster play and more possessions.
IK Eos Women
Sweden - Svenska Basketligan Dam
League Pos.
11 / 13
| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall |
L
L
L
L
L
|
70.50 |
| Home |
L
W
L
|
75.67 |
| Away |
L
L
L
L
L
|
67.40 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 12.5% | 33.3% | 0.0% |
| Total Points Avg | 147.88 | 156.67 | 142.6 |
| Scored | 70.50 | 75.67 | 67.40 |
| Conceded | 77.38 | 81.00 | 75.20 |
| Pace Avg | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Off. Rating | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Def. Rating | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ATS Cover % | 0% | 0% | 0% |
* Pace is not a value indicator but shows game tempo — higher numbers mean faster play and more possessions.
Scoring consistency tracker
Last 10 games & full season
Last 3
Last 5 ⚠️
Last 10 ⚠️
Season
Hogsbo Women is +28% better in terms of Points Scored
Hogsbo Women at Home
IK Eos Women at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Scored Per Game | Hogsbo Women | IK Eos Women |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 67% | 0% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 0% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 33% | 100% |
🟢 Green = potential value signal · 🟡 Yellow = needs confirmation · 🔴 Red = caution. Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Hogsbo Women is +22% better in terms of Points Scored
Hogsbo Women at Home
IK Eos Women at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Scored Per Game | Hogsbo Women | IK Eos Women |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 50% | 0% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 25% | 20% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 25% | 80% |
🟢 Green = potential value signal · 🟡 Yellow = needs confirmation · 🔴 Red = caution. Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Hogsbo Women is +22% better in terms of Points Scored
Hogsbo Women at Home
IK Eos Women at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Scored Per Game | Hogsbo Women | IK Eos Women |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 50% | 0% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 25% | 20% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 25% | 80% |
🟢 Green = potential value signal · 🟡 Yellow = needs confirmation · 🔴 Red = caution. Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Hogsbo Women is +22% better in terms of Points Scored
Hogsbo Women at Home
IK Eos Women at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Scored Per Game | Hogsbo Women | IK Eos Women |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 50% | 0% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 25% | 20% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 25% | 80% |
🟢 Green = potential value signal · 🟡 Yellow = needs confirmation · 🔴 Red = caution. Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Offensive Efficiency & Shooting Profile
Where Teams Gain or Lose Value
🟢 Green = strong efficiency or shooting edge · 🟡 Yellow = balanced/average · 🔴 Red = weakness, needs caution. Some stats (like 3P Rate and FT Rate) indicate playing style, not necessarily good or bad — interpret in context.
Possession Control & Rebounding
Assists. Turnovers. Pace
Defensive Consistency vs Season Average
Last 10 & season games
Last 3
Last 5 ⚠️
Last 10 ⚠️
Season
Hogsbo Women is +26% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
Hogsbo Women at Home
IK Eos Women at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Conceded Per Game | Hogsbo Women | IK Eos Women |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 0% | 33% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 33% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 100% | 33% |
🟢 Green = strong defensive hold (unders-friendly) · 🟡 Yellow = neutral · 🔴 Red = weak defense (overs risk). Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Hogsbo Women is +14% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
Hogsbo Women at Home
IK Eos Women at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Conceded Per Game | Hogsbo Women | IK Eos Women |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 25% | 40% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 20% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 75% | 40% |
🟢 Green = strong defensive hold (unders-friendly) · 🟡 Yellow = neutral · 🔴 Red = weak defense (overs risk). Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Hogsbo Women is +14% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
Hogsbo Women at Home
IK Eos Women at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Conceded Per Game | Hogsbo Women | IK Eos Women |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 25% | 40% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 20% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 75% | 40% |
🟢 Green = strong defensive hold (unders-friendly) · 🟡 Yellow = neutral · 🔴 Red = weak defense (overs risk). Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Hogsbo Women is +14% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
Hogsbo Women at Home
IK Eos Women at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Conceded Per Game | Hogsbo Women | IK Eos Women |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 25% | 40% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 20% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 75% | 40% |
🟢 Green = strong defensive hold (unders-friendly) · 🟡 Yellow = neutral · 🔴 Red = weak defense (overs risk). Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Defensive Matchup
Edge Style vs Style
🟢 Green = Clear defensive edge (profitable trend) · 🟡 Yellow = Neutral (no big edge) · 🔴 Red = Weak defense / exploitable
Defensive Pressure & Disruption
Who Forces Mistakes?
🟢 Green = Strong edge · 🟡 Yellow = Average · 🔴 Red = Weak edge
* Rate = per 100 possessions. · Others = per game averages.
Total Points Hit-Rate
Scoring trends 10 & seasone games
Last 3
Last 5 ⚠️
Last 10 ⚠️
Season
Over X Points
Under X Points
| Match Points | Hogsbo Women | IK Eos Women | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 110.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Over 120.5 | 75% | 100% | 89% |
| Over 130.5 | 75% | 60% | 67% |
| Over 140.5 | 50% | 60% | 56% |
| Over 150.5 | 50% | 20% | 33% |
| Over 160.5 | 50% | 20% | 33% |
| Over 170.5 | 25% | 0% | 11% |
| Over 180.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Hogsbo Women | IK Eos Women | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 110.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Under 120.5 | 25% | 0% | 11% |
| Under 130.5 | 25% | 40% | 33% |
| Under 140.5 | 50% | 40% | 44% |
| Under 150.5 | 50% | 80% | 67% |
| Under 160.5 | 50% | 80% | 67% |
| Under 170.5 | 75% | 100% | 89% |
| Under 180.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
🟢 Green = Strong over-trend· 🟡 Yellow = Balanced · 🔴 Red = Weak over-trend
Over X Points
Under X Points
| Match Points | Hogsbo Women | IK Eos Women | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 110.5 | 67% | 67% | 67% |
| Over 120.5 | 33% | 67% | 50% |
| Over 130.5 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| Over 140.5 | 0% | 33% | 17% |
| Over 150.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Hogsbo Women | IK Eos Women | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 110.5 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| Under 120.5 | 67% | 33% | 50% |
| Under 130.5 | 67% | 67% | 67% |
| Under 140.5 | 100% | 67% | 83% |
| Under 150.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
🟢 Green = Strong over-trend· 🟡 Yellow = Balanced · 🔴 Red = Weak over-trend
Over X Points
Under X Points
| Match Points | Hogsbo Women | IK Eos Women | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 110.5 | 100% | 80% | 89% |
| Over 120.5 | 75% | 80% | 78% |
| Over 130.5 | 75% | 40% | 56% |
| Over 140.5 | 50% | 40% | 44% |
| Over 150.5 | 50% | 0% | 22% |
| Over 160.5 | 50% | 0% | 22% |
| Over 170.5 | 25% | 0% | 11% |
| Over 180.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Hogsbo Women | IK Eos Women | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 110.5 | 0% | 20% | 11% |
| Under 120.5 | 25% | 20% | 22% |
| Under 130.5 | 25% | 60% | 44% |
| Under 140.5 | 50% | 60% | 56% |
| Under 150.5 | 50% | 100% | 78% |
| Under 160.5 | 50% | 100% | 78% |
| Under 170.5 | 75% | 100% | 89% |
| Under 180.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
🟢 Green = Strong over-trend· 🟡 Yellow = Balanced · 🔴 Red = Weak over-trend
Over X Points
Under X Points
| Match Points | Hogsbo Women | IK Eos Women | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 110.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Over 120.5 | 75% | 100% | 89% |
| Over 130.5 | 75% | 60% | 67% |
| Over 140.5 | 50% | 60% | 56% |
| Over 150.5 | 50% | 20% | 33% |
| Over 160.5 | 50% | 20% | 33% |
| Over 170.5 | 25% | 0% | 11% |
| Over 180.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Hogsbo Women | IK Eos Women | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 110.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Under 120.5 | 25% | 0% | 11% |
| Under 130.5 | 25% | 40% | 33% |
| Under 140.5 | 50% | 40% | 44% |
| Under 150.5 | 50% | 80% | 67% |
| Under 160.5 | 50% | 80% | 67% |
| Under 170.5 | 75% | 100% | 89% |
| Under 180.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
🟢 Green = Strong over-trend· 🟡 Yellow = Balanced · 🔴 Red = Weak over-trend
IK Eos Women -
Player Projections
Small sample for some players
Last 5 Games
Last 10 Games
Season
OUT Players
Reset all to IN
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Lovisa Ejbyfeldt | |||||||||||||
| Linnea Malmgren | |||||||||||||
| Hanna Klingberg | |||||||||||||
| Tova Erlandsson | |||||||||||||
| Ester Olsson | |||||||||||||
| Alma Johansson | |||||||||||||
| Hilma Gross | |||||||||||||
| Klara Bergholtz | |||||||||||||
| Patricia Axelsson |
OUT Players
Reset all to IN
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Lovisa Ejbyfeldt | |||||||||||||
| Linnea Malmgren | |||||||||||||
| Hanna Klingberg | |||||||||||||
| Tova Erlandsson | |||||||||||||
| Ester Olsson | |||||||||||||
| Alma Johansson | |||||||||||||
| Hilma Gross | |||||||||||||
| Klara Bergholtz | |||||||||||||
| Patricia Axelsson |
OUT Players
Reset all to IN
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Lovisa Ejbyfeldt | |||||||||||||
| Linnea Malmgren | |||||||||||||
| Hanna Klingberg | |||||||||||||
| Tova Erlandsson | |||||||||||||
| Ester Olsson | |||||||||||||
| Alma Johansson | |||||||||||||
| Hilma Gross | |||||||||||||
| Klara Bergholtz | |||||||||||||
| Patricia Axelsson |
* Colored values are our “value check” candidates. Always compare with market lines before deciding.
Roasters & Injured Players
Hogsbo Women
IK Eos Women
Roasters
No roster players listed for this team.
Injured
No injured players listed for either team.
| # | Team | W | L | PCT | PPG | OPP PPG | DIFF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Uppsala Basket Women | 10 | 1 | 0.909 | 83.2 | 71.4 | - |
| 2 | Lulea Women | 9 | 1 | 0.900 | 88.8 | 64.4 | - |
| 3 | Hogsbo Women | 7 | 4 | 0.636 | 85.0 | 71.9 | - |
| 4 | Norrkoping Dolphins Women | 7 | 3 | 0.700 | 83.3 | 72.0 | - |
| 5 | AIK Basket Women | 6 | 3 | 0.667 | 81.9 | 74.8 | - |
| 6 | Sodertalje Women | 5 | 5 | 0.500 | 77.8 | 67.9 | - |
| 7 | Malbas Malmo (W) | 5 | 5 | 0.500 | 77.9 | 81.1 | - |
| 8 | KFUM Ostersund Basket Women | 5 | 4 | 0.556 | 80.2 | 76.4 | - |
| 9 | Brahe Women | 4 | 6 | 0.400 | 70.3 | 70.7 | - |
| 10 | Alvik BBK Women | 3 | 5 | 0.375 | 71.1 | 73.3 | - |
| 11 | IK Eos Women | 1 | 8 | 0.111 | 71.9 | 79.3 | - |
| 12 | Visby Ladies Women | 1 | 9 | 0.100 | 60.1 | 87.8 | - |
| 13 | BG Luleå Women | 1 | 10 | 0.091 | 49.1 | 88.3 | - |
Monthly & Opponent Breakdown (How to Use)
Compares a team/player’s overall averages to their performance vs a specific opponent.
Why it’s useful:
Betting use:
Game Outcome Summary (How to Use)