96.00
W
IK Eos
Sweden flag
Sweden
Sunday Nov 16, 2025 - 06:30 (America/New_York)
IK Eos vs KFUM Fryshuset
Stats, H2H, Live Scores & xG
77.00
W L L W W
KFUM Fryshuset
Note: The current season has recently started, and one or both teams have played fewer than 5 matches.

Scoring Intelligence Panel

IK Eos vs KFUM Fryshuset
How to use
N/A
Possessions / Game
League Average: N/A
156
Points / Match
League Average: 161
14.1
( High )
Volatility
League Average: 10.9
🟢 Green = favorable situation (high pace, strong over trend, or very stable totals) ✅ · ⚪ Gray = neutral, close to league average 👌 · 🟡 Yellow / 🟠 Orange = warning, results can swing more than usual ⚠️ · 🔴 Red = unfavorable / high risk (low pace for overs, strong under lean, or very volatile games) ❌

Head to Head Statistics

IK Eos vs KFUM Fryshuset
All Time
Last 3 Games
IK Eos
(25%)
4
Matches
1 Win
3 Wins
KFUM Fryshuset
(75%)
0% Over 151.5
0 / 4
50% Over 161.5
2 / 4
50% Over 171.5
2 / 4
🟢 Green = value ✅ · 🟡 Yellow = risky ⚠️ · 🔴 Red = skip ❌
IK Eos
(33%)
3
Matches
1 Win
2 Wins
KFUM Fryshuset
(67%)
0% Over 151.5
0 / 3
67% Over 161.5
2 / 3
33% Over 171.5
1 / 3
🟢 Green = value ✅ · 🟡 Yellow = risky ⚠️ · 🔴 Red = skip ❌

Scoring Momentum (Recent Form)

How to use
Metric IK Eos KFUM Fryshuset
Average Total Points (Last 5 Games) 149.80 154.60
Previous 5 Avg 0 0
Trend Line (Last 5 Games) 141, 156, 169, 155, 128 161, 163, 138, 138, 173
🟢 Green = value ✅ · 🟡 Yellow = risky ⚠️ · 🔴 Red = skip ❌

Team performance vs top opponents

scoring, conceding, and net rating.
How to use
Metric IK Eos KFUM Fryshuset
Avg Pts vs Top 5 Def 85.7 90.0
Avg Pts Conceded vs Top 5 Off 80.7 75.0
Net Rating vs Top 5 Opps 0.0 0.0
🟢 Green = value ✅ · 🟡 Yellow = risky ⚠️ · 🔴 Red = skip ❌ — Values are compared to the team's own season average. These indicators reflect performance against top opponents (TOP 5 offenses and defenses) and help assess true team strength.

Recent momentum

last 5 vs previous 5 games.
How to use
IK Eos
KFUM Fryshuset
Period Avg Points Scored Avg Points Conceded Net Change
Last 5 80.2 85.6 -5.4
Previous 5 80.0 71.0 +9.0
Period Avg Points Scored Avg Points Conceded Net Change
Last 5 89.4 79.8 +9.6
Previous 5 79.2 75.6 +3.6
🟢 Green = improving form 📈 · 🟡 Yellow = neutral ➖ · 🔴 Red = declining form 📉 — Momentum analysis shows whether the team has recently been improving in offense and defense, or on the contrary – losing stability.

Superettan Basket flag IK Eos

Sweden - Superettan Basket
League Pos. 4 / 14

Form Results PPG
Overall
L L W W W
78.33
Home
W
96.00
Away
L L W W L
74.80
Stats Overall Home Away
Win % 50.0% 100.0% 40.0%
Total Points Avg 149.33 169 145.4
Scored 78.33 96.00 74.80
Conceded 71.00 73.00 70.60
Pace Avg 0 0 0
Off. Rating 0 0 0
Def. Rating 0 0 0
ATS Cover % 0% 0% 0%
* Pace is not a value indicator but shows game tempo — higher numbers mean faster play and more possessions.

Sweden flag KFUM Fryshuset

Sweden - Superettan Basket
League Pos. 1 / 14

Form Results PPG
Overall
W W L L W
85.78
Home
W W W W
96.75
Away
W L L W W
77.00
Stats Overall Home Away
Win % 77.8% 100.0% 60.0%
Total Points Avg 162.11 174.25 152.4
Scored 85.78 96.75 77.00
Conceded 76.33 77.50 75.40
Pace Avg 0 0 0
Off. Rating 0 0 0
Def. Rating 0 0 0
ATS Cover % 0% 0% 0%
* Pace is not a value indicator but shows game tempo — higher numbers mean faster play and more possessions.

Scoring consistency tracker

Last 10 games & full season
How to use
Last 3 ⚠️
Last 5 ⚠️
Last 10 ⚠️
Season

IK Eos is +36% better in terms of Points Scored

IK Eos IK Eos at Home
Avg. team scoring home 96 points
KFUM Fryshuset KFUM Fryshuset at Away
Avg. team scoring away 71 points
Full-Time
Quarters
Scored Per Game IK Eos KFUM Fryshuset
% Above Avg (+5%) 100% 33%
% Around Avg (±5%) 0% 0%
% Well below Avg (-5%) 0% 67%
Data For Premium Members Only
Scored Quarters IK Eos KFUM Fryshuset
Scored Average Q1
Scored Average Q2
Scored Average Q3
Scored Average Q4
🟢 Green = potential value signal · 🟡 Yellow = needs confirmation · 🔴 Red = caution. Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.

IK Eos is +25% better in terms of Points Scored

IK Eos IK Eos at Home
Avg. team scoring home 96 points
KFUM Fryshuset KFUM Fryshuset at Away
Avg. team scoring away 77 points
Full-Time
Quarters
Scored Per Game IK Eos KFUM Fryshuset
% Above Avg (+5%) 100% 60%
% Around Avg (±5%) 0% 0%
% Well below Avg (-5%) 0% 40%
Data For Premium Members Only
Scored Quarters IK Eos KFUM Fryshuset
Scored Average Q1
Scored Average Q2
Scored Average Q3
Scored Average Q4
🟢 Green = potential value signal · 🟡 Yellow = needs confirmation · 🔴 Red = caution. Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.

IK Eos is +25% better in terms of Points Scored

IK Eos IK Eos at Home
Avg. team scoring home 96 points
KFUM Fryshuset KFUM Fryshuset at Away
Avg. team scoring away 77 points
Full-Time
Quarters
Scored Per Game IK Eos KFUM Fryshuset
% Above Avg (+5%) 100% 60%
% Around Avg (±5%) 0% 0%
% Well below Avg (-5%) 0% 40%
Data For Premium Members Only
Scored Quarters IK Eos KFUM Fryshuset
Scored Average Q1
Scored Average Q2
Scored Average Q3
Scored Average Q4
🟢 Green = potential value signal · 🟡 Yellow = needs confirmation · 🔴 Red = caution. Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.

IK Eos is +25% better in terms of Points Scored

IK Eos IK Eos at Home
Avg. team scoring home 96 points
KFUM Fryshuset KFUM Fryshuset at Away
Avg. team scoring away 77 points
Full-Time
Quarters
Scored Per Game IK Eos KFUM Fryshuset
% Above Avg (+5%) 100% 60%
% Around Avg (±5%) 0% 0%
% Well below Avg (-5%) 0% 40%
Data For Premium Members Only
Scored Quarters IK Eos KFUM Fryshuset
Scored Average Q1
Scored Average Q2
Scored Average Q3
Scored Average Q4
🟢 Green = potential value signal · 🟡 Yellow = needs confirmation · 🔴 Red = caution. Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.

Offensive Efficiency & Shooting Profile

Where Teams Gain or Lose Value
Data For Premium Members Only
Efficiency & Shooting IK Eos KFUM Fryshuset
FG
2 Points (2P)
3 Points (3P)
Free Throw
Efficient FG
3P Average Rate
Free Throw Rate
Offensive Rating
🟢 Green = strong efficiency or shooting edge · 🟡 Yellow = balanced/average · 🔴 Red = weakness, needs caution. Some stats (like 3P Rate and FT Rate) indicate playing style, not necessarily good or bad — interpret in context.

Possession Control & Rebounding

Assists. Turnovers. Pace
Data For Premium Members Only
Control & Rebounding IK Eos KFUM Fryshuset
Assists/Game
Assist Rate
Turnovers/Game
Turnover Rate (TOV%)
Offensive Rebound
Pace
Possessions
🟢 Green = strong edge · 🟡 Yellow = neutral/needs context · 🔴 Red = weakness/avoid

Defensive Consistency vs Season Average

Last 10 & season games
How to use
Last 3 ⚠️
Last 5 ⚠️
Last 10 ⚠️
Season

IK Eos is +3% better defensively (fewer points conceded)

IK Eos IK Eos at Home
Avg. team conceded home 73 points
KFUM Fryshuset KFUM Fryshuset at Away
Avg. team conceded away 75 points
Full-Time
Quarters
Conceded Per Game IK Eos KFUM Fryshuset
% Below Avg (-5%) 0% 0%
% Around Avg (±5%) 0% 67%
% Well Above Avg (+7%) 100% 33%
Data For Premium Members Only
Conceded by Quarter IK Eos KFUM Fryshuset
Q1 Conceded Avg
Q2 Conceded Avg
Q3 Conceded Avg
Q4 Conceded Avg
🟢 Green = strong defensive hold (unders-friendly) · 🟡 Yellow = neutral · 🔴 Red = weak defense (overs risk). Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.

IK Eos is +3% better defensively (fewer points conceded)

IK Eos IK Eos at Home
Avg. team conceded home 73 points
KFUM Fryshuset KFUM Fryshuset at Away
Avg. team conceded away 75 points
Full-Time
Quarters
Conceded Per Game IK Eos KFUM Fryshuset
% Below Avg (-5%) 0% 0%
% Around Avg (±5%) 0% 80%
% Well Above Avg (+7%) 100% 20%
Data For Premium Members Only
Conceded by Quarter IK Eos KFUM Fryshuset
Q1 Conceded Avg
Q2 Conceded Avg
Q3 Conceded Avg
Q4 Conceded Avg
🟢 Green = strong defensive hold (unders-friendly) · 🟡 Yellow = neutral · 🔴 Red = weak defense (overs risk). Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.

IK Eos is +3% better defensively (fewer points conceded)

IK Eos IK Eos at Home
Avg. team conceded home 73 points
KFUM Fryshuset KFUM Fryshuset at Away
Avg. team conceded away 75 points
Full-Time
Quarters
Conceded Per Game IK Eos KFUM Fryshuset
% Below Avg (-5%) 0% 0%
% Around Avg (±5%) 0% 80%
% Well Above Avg (+7%) 100% 20%
Data For Premium Members Only
Conceded by Quarter IK Eos KFUM Fryshuset
Q1 Conceded Avg
Q2 Conceded Avg
Q3 Conceded Avg
Q4 Conceded Avg
🟢 Green = strong defensive hold (unders-friendly) · 🟡 Yellow = neutral · 🔴 Red = weak defense (overs risk). Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.

IK Eos is +3% better defensively (fewer points conceded)

IK Eos IK Eos at Home
Avg. team conceded home 73 points
KFUM Fryshuset KFUM Fryshuset at Away
Avg. team conceded away 75 points
Full-Time
Quarters
Conceded Per Game IK Eos KFUM Fryshuset
% Below Avg (-5%) 0% 0%
% Around Avg (±5%) 0% 80%
% Well Above Avg (+7%) 100% 20%
Data For Premium Members Only
Conceded by Quarter IK Eos KFUM Fryshuset
Q1 Conceded Avg
Q2 Conceded Avg
Q3 Conceded Avg
Q4 Conceded Avg
🟢 Green = strong defensive hold (unders-friendly) · 🟡 Yellow = neutral · 🔴 Red = weak defense (overs risk). Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.

Defensive Matchup

Edge Style vs Style
Data For Premium Members Only
Efficiency & Shot Profile IK Eos KFUM Fryshuset
Defensive Rating
Opp FG%
Opp 2PT%
Opp 3PT%
Opp EFG%
3PT Attempt Rate Allowed
Free Throw Rate Allowed
Defensive Rebound %
🟢 Green = Clear defensive edge (profitable trend) · 🟡 Yellow = Neutral (no big edge) · 🔴 Red = Weak defense / exploitable

Defensive Pressure & Disruption

Who Forces Mistakes?
Data For Premium Members Only
Pressure & Disruption IK Eos KFUM Fryshuset
Forced Turnover Rate
Steal Rate
Block Rate
Steals/Game
Turnovers Forced/Game
🟢 Green = Strong edge · 🟡 Yellow = Average · 🔴 Red = Weak edge
* Rate = per 100 possessions. · Others = per game averages.

Total Points Hit-Rate

Scoring trends 10 & seasone games
Last 3 ⚠️
Last 5 ⚠️
Last 10 ⚠️
Season
Over X Points
Under X Points
Match Points IK Eos KFUM Fryshuset Average
Over 130.5 100% 100% 100%
Over 140.5 100% 60% 67%
Over 150.5 100% 60% 67%
Over 160.5 100% 40% 50%
Over 170.5 0% 0% 0%
Match Points IK Eos KFUM Fryshuset Average
Under 130.5 0% 0% 0%
Under 140.5 0% 40% 33%
Under 150.5 0% 40% 33%
Under 160.5 0% 60% 50%
Under 170.5 100% 100% 100%
🟢 Green = Strong over-trend· 🟡 Yellow = Balanced · 🔴 Red = Weak over-trend
Over X Points
Under X Points
Match Points IK Eos KFUM Fryshuset Average
Over 130.5 100% 67% 75%
Over 140.5 100% 33% 50%
Over 150.5 100% 33% 50%
Over 160.5 100% 33% 50%
Over 170.5 0% 0% 0%
Match Points IK Eos KFUM Fryshuset Average
Under 130.5 0% 33% 25%
Under 140.5 0% 67% 50%
Under 150.5 0% 67% 50%
Under 160.5 0% 67% 50%
Under 170.5 100% 100% 100%
🟢 Green = Strong over-trend· 🟡 Yellow = Balanced · 🔴 Red = Weak over-trend
Over X Points
Under X Points
Match Points IK Eos KFUM Fryshuset Average
Over 130.5 100% 80% 83%
Over 140.5 100% 40% 50%
Over 150.5 100% 40% 50%
Over 160.5 100% 20% 33%
Over 170.5 0% 0% 0%
Match Points IK Eos KFUM Fryshuset Average
Under 130.5 0% 20% 17%
Under 140.5 0% 60% 50%
Under 150.5 0% 60% 50%
Under 160.5 0% 80% 67%
Under 170.5 100% 100% 100%
🟢 Green = Strong over-trend· 🟡 Yellow = Balanced · 🔴 Red = Weak over-trend
Over X Points
Under X Points
Match Points IK Eos KFUM Fryshuset Average
Over 130.5 100% 100% 100%
Over 140.5 100% 60% 67%
Over 150.5 100% 60% 67%
Over 160.5 100% 40% 50%
Over 170.5 0% 0% 0%
Match Points IK Eos KFUM Fryshuset Average
Under 130.5 0% 0% 0%
Under 140.5 0% 40% 33%
Under 150.5 0% 40% 33%
Under 160.5 0% 60% 50%
Under 170.5 100% 100% 100%
🟢 Green = Strong over-trend· 🟡 Yellow = Balanced · 🔴 Red = Weak over-trend
Flag

Superettan Basket
# Team W L PCT PPG OPP PPG DIFF
1 KFUM Fryshuset 11 1 0.917 89.5 78.1 -
2 Wetterbygden Stars 7 3 0.700 79.0 78.2 -
3 Tureberg Basket 6 4 0.600 77.9 72.6 -
4 IK Eos 5 6 0.455 79.9 77.2 -
5 Djurgarden 5 5 0.500 82.1 78.6 -
6 Trelleborg Basket 5 6 0.455 80.3 82.1 -
7 Huddinge Basket 5 5 0.500 83.3 85.7 -
8 Alvik 5 5 0.500 75.0 78.5 -
9 Eskilstuna BBK 5 5 0.500 85.0 85.2 -
10 Malbas 4 4 0.500 83.0 78.9 -
11 Ockelbo 4 5 0.444 77.0 79.8 -
12 AIK Basket 3 5 0.375 76.9 77.5 -
13 Aros Basket 3 7 0.300 78.4 83.3 -
14 Blackeberg 1 8 0.111 74.1 89.2 -