81.50
W
L
Jena
Germany
Saturday Dec 06, 2025 - 12:30 (America/New_York)
Jena vs Ratiopharm Ulm
Stats, H2H, Live Scores & xG
81.00
L
L
L
W
Ratiopharm Ulm
Note: The current season has recently started, and one or both teams have played fewer than 5 matches.
Scoring Intelligence Panel
Jena vs Ratiopharm Ulm
77.4
Possessions / Game
League Average: 68.5
169
Points / Match
League Average: 167
11.4
( Medium )
Volatility
League Average: 10.6
🟢 Green = favorable situation (high pace, strong over trend, or very stable totals) ✅ ·
⚪ Gray = neutral, close to league average 👌 ·
🟡 Yellow / 🟠 Orange = warning, results can swing more than usual ⚠️ ·
🔴 Red = unfavorable / high risk (low pace for overs, strong under lean, or very volatile games) ❌
Head to Head Statistics
Jena vs Ratiopharm Ulm
All Time
Last 3 Games
13%
Over 157.5
1 / 8
50%
Over 167.5
4 / 8
38%
Over 177.5
3 / 8
🟢 Green = value ✅ ·
🟡 Yellow = risky ⚠️ ·
🔴 Red = skip ❌
0%
Over 157.5
0 / 3
67%
Over 167.5
2 / 3
33%
Over 177.5
1 / 3
🟢 Green = value ✅ ·
🟡 Yellow = risky ⚠️ ·
🔴 Red = skip ❌
Scoring Momentum (Recent Form)
| Metric | Jena | Ratiopharm Ulm |
|---|---|---|
| Average Total Points (Last 5 Games) | 179.40 | 155.40 |
| Previous 5 Avg | 0 | 0 |
| Trend Line (Last 5 Games) | 189, 157, 189, 187, 175 | 158, 160, 142, 171, 146 |
🟢 Green = value ✅ ·
🟡 Yellow = risky ⚠️ ·
🔴 Red = skip ❌
Team performance vs top opponents
scoring, conceding, and net rating.
| Metric | Jena | Ratiopharm Ulm |
|---|---|---|
| Avg Pts vs Top 5 Def | 81.0 | 84.3 |
| Avg Pts Conceded vs Top 5 Off | 82.5 | 80.7 |
| Net Rating vs Top 5 Opps | -1.9 | +6.3 |
🟢 Green = value ✅ ·
🟡 Yellow = risky ⚠️ ·
🔴 Red = skip ❌ —
Values are compared to the team's own season average.
These indicators reflect performance against top opponents (TOP 5 offenses and defenses) and help assess true team strength.
Recent momentum
last 5 vs previous 5 games.
Jena
Ratiopharm Ulm
| Period | Avg Points Scored | Avg Points Conceded | Net Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last 5 | 89.0 | 90.4 | -1.4 |
| Period | Avg Points Scored | Avg Points Conceded | Net Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last 5 | 75.0 | 80.4 | -5.4 |
🟢 Green = improving form 📈 ·
🟡 Yellow = neutral ➖ ·
🔴 Red = declining form 📉 —
Momentum analysis shows whether the team has recently been improving in offense and defense, or on the contrary – losing stability.
Jena
Germany - Basketball Bundesliga
League Pos.
9 / 18
| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall |
W
W
L
W
L
|
87.00 |
| Home |
W
L
|
81.50 |
| Away |
W
L
W
W
L
|
89.20 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 57.1% | 50.0% | 60.0% |
| Total Points Avg | 176.71 | 166 | 181 |
| Scored | 87.00 | 81.50 | 89.20 |
| Conceded | 89.71 | 84.50 | 91.80 |
| Pace Avg | 77.88 | 79.87 | 77.08 |
| Off. Rating | 108.01 | 100.54 | 111.02 |
| Def. Rating | 89.01 | 92.31 | 87.80 |
| ATS Cover % | 14.3% | 50.0% | 0.0% |
* Pace is not a value indicator but shows game tempo — higher numbers mean faster play and more possessions.
Ratiopharm Ulm
Germany - Basketball Bundesliga
League Pos.
14 / 18
| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall |
L
L
L
L
L
|
81.13 |
| Home |
L
L
W
W
|
81.25 |
| Away |
L
L
L
W
|
81.00 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 37.5% | 50.0% | 25.0% |
| Total Points Avg | 162.26 | 160.5 | 164 |
| Scored | 81.13 | 81.25 | 81.00 |
| Conceded | 81.13 | 79.25 | 83.00 |
| Pace Avg | 74.08 | 76.23 | 71.93 |
| Off. Rating | 107.83 | 105.78 | 109.96 |
| Def. Rating | 89.52 | 94.95 | 84.34 |
| ATS Cover % | 37.5% | 50.0% | 25.0% |
* Pace is not a value indicator but shows game tempo — higher numbers mean faster play and more possessions.
Scoring consistency tracker
Last 10 games & full season
Last 3 ⚠️
Last 5 ⚠️
Last 10 ⚠️
Season
Jena is +6% better in terms of Points Scored
Jena at Home
Ratiopharm Ulm at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Scored Per Game | Jena | Ratiopharm Ulm |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 0% | 0% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 50% | 67% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 50% | 33% |
🟢 Green = potential value signal · 🟡 Yellow = needs confirmation · 🔴 Red = caution. Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Jena is +1% better in terms of Points Scored
Jena at Home
Ratiopharm Ulm at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Scored Per Game | Jena | Ratiopharm Ulm |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 0% | 25% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 50% | 50% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 50% | 25% |
🟢 Green = potential value signal · 🟡 Yellow = needs confirmation · 🔴 Red = caution. Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Jena is +1% better in terms of Points Scored
Jena at Home
Ratiopharm Ulm at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Scored Per Game | Jena | Ratiopharm Ulm |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 0% | 25% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 50% | 50% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 50% | 25% |
🟢 Green = potential value signal · 🟡 Yellow = needs confirmation · 🔴 Red = caution. Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Jena is +1% better in terms of Points Scored
Jena at Home
Ratiopharm Ulm at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Scored Per Game | Jena | Ratiopharm Ulm |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 0% | 25% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 50% | 50% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 50% | 25% |
🟢 Green = potential value signal · 🟡 Yellow = needs confirmation · 🔴 Red = caution. Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Offensive Efficiency & Shooting Profile
Where Teams Gain or Lose Value
🟢 Green = strong efficiency or shooting edge · 🟡 Yellow = balanced/average · 🔴 Red = weakness, needs caution. Some stats (like 3P Rate and FT Rate) indicate playing style, not necessarily good or bad — interpret in context.
Possession Control & Rebounding
Assists. Turnovers. Pace
Defensive Consistency vs Season Average
Last 10 & season games
Last 3 ⚠️
Last 5 ⚠️
Last 10 ⚠️
Season
Ratiopharm Ulm is +3% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
Jena at Home
Ratiopharm Ulm at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Conceded Per Game | Jena | Ratiopharm Ulm |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 50% | 33% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 33% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 50% | 33% |
🟢 Green = strong defensive hold (unders-friendly) · 🟡 Yellow = neutral · 🔴 Red = weak defense (overs risk). Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Ratiopharm Ulm is +2% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
Jena at Home
Ratiopharm Ulm at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Conceded Per Game | Jena | Ratiopharm Ulm |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 50% | 25% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 50% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 50% | 25% |
🟢 Green = strong defensive hold (unders-friendly) · 🟡 Yellow = neutral · 🔴 Red = weak defense (overs risk). Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Ratiopharm Ulm is +2% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
Jena at Home
Ratiopharm Ulm at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Conceded Per Game | Jena | Ratiopharm Ulm |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 50% | 25% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 50% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 50% | 25% |
🟢 Green = strong defensive hold (unders-friendly) · 🟡 Yellow = neutral · 🔴 Red = weak defense (overs risk). Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Ratiopharm Ulm is +2% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
Jena at Home
Ratiopharm Ulm at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Conceded Per Game | Jena | Ratiopharm Ulm |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 50% | 25% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 50% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 50% | 25% |
🟢 Green = strong defensive hold (unders-friendly) · 🟡 Yellow = neutral · 🔴 Red = weak defense (overs risk). Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Defensive Matchup
Edge Style vs Style
🟢 Green = Clear defensive edge (profitable trend) · 🟡 Yellow = Neutral (no big edge) · 🔴 Red = Weak defense / exploitable
Defensive Pressure & Disruption
Who Forces Mistakes?
🟢 Green = Strong edge · 🟡 Yellow = Average · 🔴 Red = Weak edge
* Rate = per 100 possessions. · Others = per game averages.
Total Points Hit-Rate
Scoring trends 10 & seasone games
Last 3 ⚠️
Last 5 ⚠️
Last 10 ⚠️
Season
Over X Points
Under X Points
| Match Points | Jena | Ratiopharm Ulm | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 140.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Over 150.5 | 100% | 75% | 83% |
| Over 160.5 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| Over 170.5 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| Over 180.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Jena | Ratiopharm Ulm | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 140.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Under 150.5 | 0% | 25% | 17% |
| Under 160.5 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| Under 170.5 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| Under 180.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
🟢 Green = Strong over-trend· 🟡 Yellow = Balanced · 🔴 Red = Weak over-trend
Over X Points
Under X Points
| Match Points | Jena | Ratiopharm Ulm | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 150.5 | 100% | 67% | 80% |
| Over 160.5 | 50% | 33% | 40% |
| Over 170.5 | 50% | 33% | 40% |
| Over 180.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Jena | Ratiopharm Ulm | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 150.5 | 0% | 33% | 20% |
| Under 160.5 | 50% | 67% | 60% |
| Under 170.5 | 50% | 67% | 60% |
| Under 180.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
🟢 Green = Strong over-trend· 🟡 Yellow = Balanced · 🔴 Red = Weak over-trend
Over X Points
Under X Points
| Match Points | Jena | Ratiopharm Ulm | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 140.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Over 150.5 | 100% | 75% | 83% |
| Over 160.5 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| Over 170.5 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| Over 180.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Jena | Ratiopharm Ulm | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 140.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Under 150.5 | 0% | 25% | 17% |
| Under 160.5 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| Under 170.5 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| Under 180.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
🟢 Green = Strong over-trend· 🟡 Yellow = Balanced · 🔴 Red = Weak over-trend
Over X Points
Under X Points
| Match Points | Jena | Ratiopharm Ulm | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 140.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Over 150.5 | 100% | 75% | 83% |
| Over 160.5 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| Over 170.5 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| Over 180.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Jena | Ratiopharm Ulm | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 140.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Under 150.5 | 0% | 25% | 17% |
| Under 160.5 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| Under 170.5 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| Under 180.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
🟢 Green = Strong over-trend· 🟡 Yellow = Balanced · 🔴 Red = Weak over-trend
Jena -
Player Projections
Small sample for some players
Last 5 Games
Last 10 Games
Season
List of OUT players:
Reset all to IN
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Alex Herrera | |||||||||||||
| Lorenz Bank | |||||||||||||
| Kristofer Krause | |||||||||||||
| Robin Christen | |||||||||||||
| Chris Carter | |||||||||||||
| Eric Washington | |||||||||||||
| Keith Braxton | |||||||||||||
| Naz Bohannon | |||||||||||||
| Great Osobor | |||||||||||||
| Tavian Dunn-Martin | |||||||||||||
| Daniel Biel | |||||||||||||
| Joe Wieskamp | |||||||||||||
| Jakob Lang | |||||||||||||
| Maxim Bader | |||||||||||||
| Seikou Sisoho Jawara |
List of OUT players:
Reset all to IN
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Alex Herrera | |||||||||||||
| Lorenz Bank | |||||||||||||
| Kristofer Krause | |||||||||||||
| Robin Christen | |||||||||||||
| Chris Carter | |||||||||||||
| Eric Washington | |||||||||||||
| Keith Braxton | |||||||||||||
| Naz Bohannon | |||||||||||||
| Great Osobor | |||||||||||||
| Tavian Dunn-Martin | |||||||||||||
| Daniel Biel | |||||||||||||
| Joe Wieskamp | |||||||||||||
| Jakob Lang | |||||||||||||
| Maxim Bader | |||||||||||||
| Seikou Sisoho Jawara |
List of OUT players:
Reset all to IN
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Alex Herrera | |||||||||||||
| Lorenz Bank | |||||||||||||
| Kristofer Krause | |||||||||||||
| Robin Christen | |||||||||||||
| Chris Carter | |||||||||||||
| Eric Washington | |||||||||||||
| Keith Braxton | |||||||||||||
| Naz Bohannon | |||||||||||||
| Great Osobor | |||||||||||||
| Tavian Dunn-Martin | |||||||||||||
| Daniel Biel | |||||||||||||
| Joe Wieskamp | |||||||||||||
| Jakob Lang | |||||||||||||
| Maxim Bader | |||||||||||||
| Seikou Sisoho Jawara |
* Colored values are our “value check” candidates. Always compare with market lines before deciding.
Ratiopharm Ulm -
Player Projections
Small sample for some players
Last 5 Games
Last 10 Games
Season
OUT Players
Reset all to IN
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Tobias Jensen | |||||||||||||
| Nelson Weidemann | |||||||||||||
| Alec Anigbata | |||||||||||||
| Len Schoormann | |||||||||||||
| Malik Osborne | |||||||||||||
| Endurance Aiyamenkhue | |||||||||||||
| Meissa Faye | |||||||||||||
| Teo Milicic | |||||||||||||
| Namori Omog | |||||||||||||
| Christopher Ledlum | |||||||||||||
| Joel Cwik | |||||||||||||
| Lenni Kunzewitsch | |||||||||||||
| Christian Sengfelder | |||||||||||||
| Diego Garavaglia | |||||||||||||
| Mohamed Diakite | |||||||||||||
| Mark Smith | |||||||||||||
| Bryce Brown | |||||||||||||
| Thomas Klepeisz |
OUT Players
Reset all to IN
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Tobias Jensen | |||||||||||||
| Nelson Weidemann | |||||||||||||
| Alec Anigbata | |||||||||||||
| Len Schoormann | |||||||||||||
| Malik Osborne | |||||||||||||
| Endurance Aiyamenkhue | |||||||||||||
| Meissa Faye | |||||||||||||
| Teo Milicic | |||||||||||||
| Namori Omog | |||||||||||||
| Christopher Ledlum | |||||||||||||
| Joel Cwik | |||||||||||||
| Lenni Kunzewitsch | |||||||||||||
| Christian Sengfelder | |||||||||||||
| Diego Garavaglia | |||||||||||||
| Mohamed Diakite | |||||||||||||
| Mark Smith | |||||||||||||
| Bryce Brown | |||||||||||||
| Thomas Klepeisz |
OUT Players
Reset all to IN
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Tobias Jensen | |||||||||||||
| Nelson Weidemann | |||||||||||||
| Alec Anigbata | |||||||||||||
| Len Schoormann | |||||||||||||
| Malik Osborne | |||||||||||||
| Endurance Aiyamenkhue | |||||||||||||
| Meissa Faye | |||||||||||||
| Teo Milicic | |||||||||||||
| Namori Omog | |||||||||||||
| Christopher Ledlum | |||||||||||||
| Joel Cwik | |||||||||||||
| Lenni Kunzewitsch | |||||||||||||
| Christian Sengfelder | |||||||||||||
| Diego Garavaglia | |||||||||||||
| Mohamed Diakite | |||||||||||||
| Mark Smith | |||||||||||||
| Bryce Brown | |||||||||||||
| Thomas Klepeisz |
* Colored values are our “value check” candidates. Always compare with market lines before deciding.
Roasters & Injured Players
Jena
Ratiopharm Ulm
Roasters
Injured
No injured players listed for either team.
| # | Team | W | L | PCT | PPG | OPP PPG | DIFF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bayern Munchen | 6 | 1 | 0.857 | 85.3 | 76.6 | 8.7 |
| 2 | Mitteldeutscher BC | 6 | 2 | 0.750 | 86.5 | 82.1 | 4.4 |
| 3 | TBB Trier | 6 | 2 | 0.750 | 88.8 | 87.0 | 1.8 |
| 4 | Alba Berlin | 5 | 2 | 0.714 | 87.0 | 81.0 | 6.0 |
| 5 | EnBW Ludwigsburg | 5 | 2 | 0.714 | 85.9 | 84.1 | 1.7 |
| 6 | Skyliners Frankfurt | 5 | 3 | 0.625 | 86.4 | 82.5 | 3.9 |
| 7 | Würzburg | 5 | 3 | 0.625 | 79.4 | 80.8 | -1.4 |
| 8 | Brose Bamberg | 4 | 3 | 0.571 | 91.9 | 83.6 | 8.3 |
| 9 | Jena | 4 | 3 | 0.571 | 87.0 | 89.7 | -2.7 |
| 10 | Chemcats Chemnitz | 4 | 4 | 0.500 | 89.5 | 86.0 | 3.5 |
| 11 | Telekom Baskets Bonn | 4 | 4 | 0.500 | 75.5 | 77.1 | -1.6 |
| 12 | RASTA Vechta | 3 | 4 | 0.429 | 83.4 | 85.3 | -1.9 |
| 13 | Rostock Seawolves | 3 | 4 | 0.429 | 82.1 | 82.4 | -0.3 |
| 14 | Ratiopharm Ulm | 3 | 5 | 0.375 | 81.1 | 81.1 | 0.0 |
| 15 | Basketball Löwen Braunschweig | 3 | 5 | 0.375 | 80.3 | 85.0 | -4.8 |
| 16 | MLP Academics Heidelberg | 1 | 7 | 0.125 | 78.8 | 82.8 | -4.0 |
| 17 | EWE Baskets Oldenburg | 1 | 7 | 0.125 | 82.1 | 87.1 | -5.0 |
| 18 | Hamburg | 0 | 7 | 0.000 | 76.9 | 93.0 | -16.1 |
Monthly & Opponent Breakdown (How to Use)
Compares a team/player’s overall averages to their performance vs a specific opponent.
Why it’s useful:
Betting use:
Game Outcome Summary (How to Use)