78.67
L
L
L
L
L
Louvre Surabaya
Tuesday Feb 07, 2023 - 05:00 (America/New_York)
Louvre Surabaya vs Macao Black Bears
Stats, H2H, Live Scores & xG
75.40
L
W
W
L
L
Macao Black Bears
Scoring Intelligence Panel
Louvre Surabaya vs Macao Black Bears
N/A
Possessions / Game
League Average: N/A
170
Points / Match
League Average: 170
15.7
( High )
Volatility
League Average: 16.3
🟢 Green = favorable situation (high pace, strong over trend, or very stable totals) ✅ ·
⚪ Gray = neutral, close to league average 👌 ·
🟡 Yellow / 🟠 Orange = warning, results can swing more than usual ⚠️ ·
🔴 Red = unfavorable / high risk (low pace for overs, strong under lean, or very volatile games) ❌
Scoring Momentum (Recent Form)
| Metric | Louvre Surabaya | Macao Black Bears |
|---|---|---|
| Average Total Points (Last 5 Games) | 175.40 | 168.00 |
| Previous 5 Avg | 0 | 155.00 |
| Trend Line (Last 5 Games) | 140, 221, 172, 173, 171 | 171, 174, 168, 169, 158 |
🟢 Green = value ✅ ·
🟡 Yellow = risky ⚠️ ·
🔴 Red = skip ❌
Team performance vs top opponents
scoring, conceding, and net rating.
| Metric | Louvre Surabaya | Macao Black Bears |
|---|---|---|
| Avg Pts vs Top 5 Def | 63.8 | 71.6 |
| Avg Pts Conceded vs Top 5 Off | 111.1 | 79.2 |
| Net Rating vs Top 5 Opps | 0.0 | 0.0 |
🟢 Green = value ✅ ·
🟡 Yellow = risky ⚠️ ·
🔴 Red = skip ❌ —
Values are compared to the team's own season average.
These indicators reflect performance against top opponents (TOP 5 offenses and defenses) and help assess true team strength.
Recent momentum
last 5 vs previous 5 games.
Louvre Surabaya
Macao Black Bears
| Period | Avg Points Scored | Avg Points Conceded | Net Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last 5 | 73.2 | 111.0 | -37.8 |
| Previous 5 | 70.4 | 103.8 | -33.4 |
| Period | Avg Points Scored | Avg Points Conceded | Net Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last 5 | 83.4 | 79.4 | +4.0 |
| Previous 5 | 81.8 | 75.4 | +6.4 |
🟢 Green = improving form 📈 ·
🟡 Yellow = neutral ➖ ·
🔴 Red = declining form 📉 —
Momentum analysis shows whether the team has recently been improving in offense and defense, or on the contrary – losing stability.
Louvre Surabaya
ASEAN Basketball League
League Pos.
7 / 8
| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall |
L
L
L
L
L
|
73.78 |
| Home |
L
L
L
L
L
|
78.67 |
| Away |
L
L
L
|
64.00 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 11.1% | 16.7% | 0.0% |
| Total Points Avg | 178.45 | 184.84 | 165.67 |
| Scored | 73.78 | 78.67 | 64.00 |
| Conceded | 104.67 | 106.17 | 101.67 |
| Pace Avg | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Off. Rating | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Def. Rating | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ATS Cover % | 0% | 0% | 0% |
* Pace is not a value indicator but shows game tempo — higher numbers mean faster play and more possessions.
Macao Black Bears
ASEAN Basketball League
League Pos.
5 / 8
| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall |
L
L
W
L
W
|
81.40 |
| Home |
L
W
L
W
L
|
87.40 |
| Away |
L
W
W
L
L
|
75.40 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 40.0% | 40.0% | 40.0% |
| Total Points Avg | 161.5 | 171.6 | 151.4 |
| Scored | 81.40 | 87.40 | 75.40 |
| Conceded | 80.10 | 84.20 | 76.00 |
| Pace Avg | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Off. Rating | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Def. Rating | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ATS Cover % | 0% | 0% | 0% |
* Pace is not a value indicator but shows game tempo — higher numbers mean faster play and more possessions.
Scoring consistency tracker
Last 10 games & full season
Last 3
Last 5
Last 10 ⚠️
Season
Macao Black Bears is +7% better in terms of Points Scored
Louvre Surabaya at Home
Macao Black Bears at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Scored Per Game | Louvre Surabaya | Macao Black Bears |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 0% | 33% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 67% | 33% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 33% | 33% |
🟢 Green = potential value signal · 🟡 Yellow = needs confirmation · 🔴 Red = caution. Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Macao Black Bears is +8% better in terms of Points Scored
Louvre Surabaya at Home
Macao Black Bears at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Scored Per Game | Louvre Surabaya | Macao Black Bears |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 0% | 20% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 40% | 20% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 60% | 60% |
🟢 Green = potential value signal · 🟡 Yellow = needs confirmation · 🔴 Red = caution. Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Louvre Surabaya is +4% better in terms of Points Scored
Louvre Surabaya at Home
Macao Black Bears at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Scored Per Game | Louvre Surabaya | Macao Black Bears |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 17% | 20% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 33% | 20% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 50% | 60% |
🟢 Green = potential value signal · 🟡 Yellow = needs confirmation · 🔴 Red = caution. Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Louvre Surabaya is +4% better in terms of Points Scored
Louvre Surabaya at Home
Macao Black Bears at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Scored Per Game | Louvre Surabaya | Macao Black Bears |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 17% | 20% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 33% | 20% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 50% | 60% |
🟢 Green = potential value signal · 🟡 Yellow = needs confirmation · 🔴 Red = caution. Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Offensive Efficiency & Shooting Profile
Where Teams Gain or Lose Value
🟢 Green = strong efficiency or shooting edge · 🟡 Yellow = balanced/average · 🔴 Red = weakness, needs caution. Some stats (like 3P Rate and FT Rate) indicate playing style, not necessarily good or bad — interpret in context.
Possession Control & Rebounding
Assists. Turnovers. Pace
Defensive Consistency vs Season Average
Last 10 & season games
Last 3
Last 5
Last 10 ⚠️
Season
Macao Black Bears is +33% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
Louvre Surabaya at Home
Macao Black Bears at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Conceded Per Game | Louvre Surabaya | Macao Black Bears |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 67% | 33% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 33% | 0% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 0% | 67% |
🟢 Green = strong defensive hold (unders-friendly) · 🟡 Yellow = neutral · 🔴 Red = weak defense (overs risk). Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Macao Black Bears is +30% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
Louvre Surabaya at Home
Macao Black Bears at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Conceded Per Game | Louvre Surabaya | Macao Black Bears |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 80% | 20% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 20% | 20% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 0% | 60% |
🟢 Green = strong defensive hold (unders-friendly) · 🟡 Yellow = neutral · 🔴 Red = weak defense (overs risk). Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Macao Black Bears is +28% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
Louvre Surabaya at Home
Macao Black Bears at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Conceded Per Game | Louvre Surabaya | Macao Black Bears |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 83% | 20% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 17% | 20% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 0% | 60% |
🟢 Green = strong defensive hold (unders-friendly) · 🟡 Yellow = neutral · 🔴 Red = weak defense (overs risk). Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Macao Black Bears is +28% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
Louvre Surabaya at Home
Macao Black Bears at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Conceded Per Game | Louvre Surabaya | Macao Black Bears |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 83% | 20% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 17% | 20% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 0% | 60% |
🟢 Green = strong defensive hold (unders-friendly) · 🟡 Yellow = neutral · 🔴 Red = weak defense (overs risk). Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Defensive Matchup
Edge Style vs Style
🟢 Green = Clear defensive edge (profitable trend) · 🟡 Yellow = Neutral (no big edge) · 🔴 Red = Weak defense / exploitable
Defensive Pressure & Disruption
Who Forces Mistakes?
🟢 Green = Strong edge · 🟡 Yellow = Average · 🔴 Red = Weak edge
* Rate = per 100 possessions. · Others = per game averages.
Total Points Hit-Rate
Scoring trends 10 & seasone games
Last 3
Last 5
Last 10 ⚠️
Season
Over X Points
Under X Points
| Match Points | Louvre Surabaya | Macao Black Bears | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 120.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Over 130.5 | 100% | 80% | 91% |
| Over 140.5 | 100% | 60% | 82% |
| Over 150.5 | 100% | 60% | 82% |
| Over 160.5 | 83% | 20% | 55% |
| Over 170.5 | 83% | 20% | 55% |
| Over 180.5 | 33% | 0% | 18% |
| Over 190.5 | 33% | 0% | 18% |
| Over 200.5 | 33% | 0% | 18% |
| Over 210.5 | 33% | 0% | 18% |
| Over 220.5 | 33% | 0% | 18% |
| Over 230.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Louvre Surabaya | Macao Black Bears | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 120.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Under 130.5 | 0% | 20% | 9% |
| Under 140.5 | 0% | 40% | 18% |
| Under 150.5 | 0% | 40% | 18% |
| Under 160.5 | 17% | 80% | 45% |
| Under 170.5 | 17% | 80% | 45% |
| Under 180.5 | 67% | 100% | 82% |
| Under 190.5 | 67% | 100% | 82% |
| Under 200.5 | 67% | 100% | 82% |
| Under 210.5 | 67% | 100% | 82% |
| Under 220.5 | 67% | 100% | 82% |
| Under 230.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
🟢 Green = Strong over-trend· 🟡 Yellow = Balanced · 🔴 Red = Weak over-trend
Over X Points
Under X Points
| Match Points | Louvre Surabaya | Macao Black Bears | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 150.5 | 67% | 67% | 67% |
| Over 160.5 | 67% | 33% | 50% |
| Over 170.5 | 67% | 33% | 50% |
| Over 180.5 | 33% | 0% | 17% |
| Over 190.5 | 33% | 0% | 17% |
| Over 200.5 | 33% | 0% | 17% |
| Over 210.5 | 33% | 0% | 17% |
| Over 220.5 | 33% | 0% | 17% |
| Over 230.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Louvre Surabaya | Macao Black Bears | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 150.5 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| Under 160.5 | 33% | 67% | 50% |
| Under 170.5 | 33% | 67% | 50% |
| Under 180.5 | 67% | 100% | 83% |
| Under 190.5 | 67% | 100% | 83% |
| Under 200.5 | 67% | 100% | 83% |
| Under 210.5 | 67% | 100% | 83% |
| Under 220.5 | 67% | 100% | 83% |
| Under 230.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
🟢 Green = Strong over-trend· 🟡 Yellow = Balanced · 🔴 Red = Weak over-trend
Over X Points
Under X Points
| Match Points | Louvre Surabaya | Macao Black Bears | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 120.5 | 80% | 80% | 80% |
| Over 130.5 | 80% | 60% | 70% |
| Over 140.5 | 80% | 40% | 60% |
| Over 150.5 | 80% | 40% | 60% |
| Over 160.5 | 80% | 20% | 50% |
| Over 170.5 | 80% | 20% | 50% |
| Over 180.5 | 20% | 0% | 10% |
| Over 190.5 | 20% | 0% | 10% |
| Over 200.5 | 20% | 0% | 10% |
| Over 210.5 | 20% | 0% | 10% |
| Over 220.5 | 20% | 0% | 10% |
| Over 230.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Louvre Surabaya | Macao Black Bears | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 120.5 | 20% | 20% | 20% |
| Under 130.5 | 20% | 40% | 30% |
| Under 140.5 | 20% | 60% | 40% |
| Under 150.5 | 20% | 60% | 40% |
| Under 160.5 | 20% | 80% | 50% |
| Under 170.5 | 20% | 80% | 50% |
| Under 180.5 | 80% | 100% | 90% |
| Under 190.5 | 80% | 100% | 90% |
| Under 200.5 | 80% | 100% | 90% |
| Under 210.5 | 80% | 100% | 90% |
| Under 220.5 | 80% | 100% | 90% |
| Under 230.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
🟢 Green = Strong over-trend· 🟡 Yellow = Balanced · 🔴 Red = Weak over-trend
Over X Points
Under X Points
| Match Points | Louvre Surabaya | Macao Black Bears | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 120.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Over 130.5 | 100% | 80% | 91% |
| Over 140.5 | 100% | 60% | 82% |
| Over 150.5 | 100% | 60% | 82% |
| Over 160.5 | 83% | 20% | 55% |
| Over 170.5 | 83% | 20% | 55% |
| Over 180.5 | 33% | 0% | 18% |
| Over 190.5 | 33% | 0% | 18% |
| Over 200.5 | 33% | 0% | 18% |
| Over 210.5 | 33% | 0% | 18% |
| Over 220.5 | 33% | 0% | 18% |
| Over 230.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Louvre Surabaya | Macao Black Bears | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 120.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Under 130.5 | 0% | 20% | 9% |
| Under 140.5 | 0% | 40% | 18% |
| Under 150.5 | 0% | 40% | 18% |
| Under 160.5 | 17% | 80% | 45% |
| Under 170.5 | 17% | 80% | 45% |
| Under 180.5 | 67% | 100% | 82% |
| Under 190.5 | 67% | 100% | 82% |
| Under 200.5 | 67% | 100% | 82% |
| Under 210.5 | 67% | 100% | 82% |
| Under 220.5 | 67% | 100% | 82% |
| Under 230.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
🟢 Green = Strong over-trend· 🟡 Yellow = Balanced · 🔴 Red = Weak over-trend
Macao Black Bears -
Player Projections
Small sample for some players
Last 5 Games
Last 10 Games
Season
OUT Players
Reset all to IN
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Shavlik Randolph | |||||||||||||
| Ronald | |||||||||||||
| Christophe | |||||||||||||
| Tyrone Nesby IV | |||||||||||||
| Will Douglas | |||||||||||||
| Myles Carter | |||||||||||||
| Niven Hart | |||||||||||||
| Chris Harris | |||||||||||||
| Mohamed Kone | |||||||||||||
| Kameron Rooks | |||||||||||||
| Derek King | |||||||||||||
| Sedrick Barefield | |||||||||||||
| Kobey Lam | |||||||||||||
| Damian Chong Qui | |||||||||||||
| Jenning Leung | |||||||||||||
| Usman Rasool | |||||||||||||
| Chan Wai Seng | |||||||||||||
| Lau Chong Pong |
OUT Players
Reset all to IN
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Shavlik Randolph | |||||||||||||
| Ronald | |||||||||||||
| Christophe | |||||||||||||
| Tyrone Nesby IV | |||||||||||||
| Will Douglas | |||||||||||||
| Myles Carter | |||||||||||||
| Niven Hart | |||||||||||||
| Chris Harris | |||||||||||||
| Mohamed Kone | |||||||||||||
| Kameron Rooks | |||||||||||||
| Derek King | |||||||||||||
| Sedrick Barefield | |||||||||||||
| Kobey Lam | |||||||||||||
| Damian Chong Qui | |||||||||||||
| Jenning Leung | |||||||||||||
| Usman Rasool | |||||||||||||
| Chan Wai Seng | |||||||||||||
| Lau Chong Pong |
OUT Players
Reset all to IN
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Shavlik Randolph | |||||||||||||
| Ronald | |||||||||||||
| Christophe | |||||||||||||
| Tyrone Nesby IV | |||||||||||||
| Will Douglas | |||||||||||||
| Myles Carter | |||||||||||||
| Niven Hart | |||||||||||||
| Chris Harris | |||||||||||||
| Mohamed Kone | |||||||||||||
| Kameron Rooks | |||||||||||||
| Derek King | |||||||||||||
| Sedrick Barefield | |||||||||||||
| Kobey Lam | |||||||||||||
| Damian Chong Qui | |||||||||||||
| Jenning Leung | |||||||||||||
| Usman Rasool | |||||||||||||
| Chan Wai Seng | |||||||||||||
| Lau Chong Pong |
* Colored values are our “value check” candidates. Always compare with market lines before deciding.
Roasters & Injured Players
Louvre Surabaya
Macao Black Bears
Roasters
No roster players listed for this team.
Injured
No injured players listed for either team.
| # | Team | W | L | PCT | PPG | OPP PPG | DIFF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Saigon Heat | 11 | 3 | 0.790 | 87.5 | 73.1 | 14.4 |
| 2 | Hong Kong Eastern | 10 | 4 | 0.710 | 80.8 | 68.1 | 12.7 |
| 3 | NS Matrix Deers | 10 | 4 | 0.710 | 86.8 | 75.8 | 11.0 |
| 4 | singapore slingers | 9 | 5 | 0.640 | 94.3 | 80.6 | 13.6 |
| 5 | Macao Black Bears | 7 | 7 | 0.500 | 81.4 | 77.0 | 4.4 |
| 6 | Zamboanga Sikat | 7 | 7 | 0.500 | 84.5 | 83.7 | 0.8 |
| 7 | Louvre Surabaya | 1 | 13 | 0.070 | 70.7 | 103.5 | -32.8 |
| 8 | Bangkok Tiger | 1 | 13 | 0.070 | 76.9 | 101.0 | -24.1 |
Monthly & Opponent Breakdown (How to Use)
Compares a team/player’s overall averages to their performance vs a specific opponent.
Why it’s useful:
Betting use:
Game Outcome Summary (How to Use)