Scoring Intelligence Panel
Mitteldeutscher BC vs EnBW Ludwigsburg
Head to Head Statistics
Mitteldeutscher BC vs EnBW Ludwigsburg
Scoring Momentum (Recent Form)
| Metric | Mitteldeutscher BC | EnBW Ludwigsburg |
|---|---|---|
| Average Total Points (Last 5 Games) | 170.80 | 179.75 |
| Previous 5 Avg | 0 | 0 |
| Trend Line (Last 5 Games) | 190, 146, 179, 161, 178 | 171, 199, 163, 186 |
Team performance vs top opponents
scoring, conceding, and net rating.
| Metric | Mitteldeutscher BC | EnBW Ludwigsburg |
|---|---|---|
| Avg Pts vs Top 5 Def | 88.5 | 88.0 |
| Avg Pts Conceded vs Top 5 Off | 78.0 | 92.0 |
| Net Rating vs Top 5 Opps | +11.2 | -6.5 |
Recent momentum
last 5 vs previous 5 games.
| Period | Avg Points Scored | Avg Points Conceded | Net Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last 5 | 83.8 | 82.4 | +1.4 |
| Period | Avg Points Scored | Avg Points Conceded | Net Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last 5 | 84.8 | 83.4 | +1.4 |
Mitteldeutscher BC
Germany - Basketball Bundesliga
League Pos.
2 / 18
| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall |
W
W
W
W
W
|
89.00 |
| Home |
W
W
|
79.50 |
| Away |
W
W
W
|
95.33 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Total Points Avg | 170.8 | 153.5 | 182.33 |
| Scored | 89.00 | 79.50 | 95.33 |
| Conceded | 81.80 | 74.00 | 87.00 |
| Pace Avg | 72.88 | 69.96 | 75.81 |
| Off. Rating | 124.39 | 123.26 | 125.41 |
| Def. Rating | 92.39 | 95.45 | 89.68 |
| ATS Cover % | 75.0% | 75.0% | 75.0% |
EnBW Ludwigsburg
Germany - Basketball Bundesliga
League Pos.
5 / 18
| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall |
W
L
L
W
|
88.75 |
| Home |
W
L
|
84.50 |
| Away |
L
W
|
93.00 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 50.0% | 50.0% | 50.0% |
| Total Points Avg | 179.75 | 167 | 192.5 |
| Scored | 88.75 | 84.50 | 93.00 |
| Conceded | 91.00 | 82.50 | 99.50 |
| Pace Avg | 77.35 | 76.43 | 78.05 |
| Off. Rating | 110.47 | 101.42 | 117.13 |
| Def. Rating | 91.00 | 101.34 | 84.66 |
| ATS Cover % | 71.4% | 66.7% | 75.0% |
Scoring consistency tracker
Last 10 games & full season
EnBW Ludwigsburg is +17% better in terms of Points Scored
| Scored Per Game | Mitteldeutscher BC | EnBW Ludwigsburg |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 0% | 100% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 50% | 0% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 50% | 0% |
EnBW Ludwigsburg is +17% better in terms of Points Scored
| Scored Per Game | Mitteldeutscher BC | EnBW Ludwigsburg |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 0% | 100% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 50% | 0% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 50% | 0% |
EnBW Ludwigsburg is +17% better in terms of Points Scored
| Scored Per Game | Mitteldeutscher BC | EnBW Ludwigsburg |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 0% | 100% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 50% | 0% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 50% | 0% |
EnBW Ludwigsburg is +17% better in terms of Points Scored
| Scored Per Game | Mitteldeutscher BC | EnBW Ludwigsburg |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 0% | 100% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 50% | 0% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 50% | 0% |
Offensive Efficiency & Shooting Profile
Where Teams Gain or Lose Value
Possession Control & Rebounding
Assists. Turnovers. Pace
Defensive Consistency vs Season Average
Last 10 & season games
Mitteldeutscher BC is +26% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
| Conceded Per Game | Mitteldeutscher BC | EnBW Ludwigsburg |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 0% | 100% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 0% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 100% | 0% |
Mitteldeutscher BC is +26% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
| Conceded Per Game | Mitteldeutscher BC | EnBW Ludwigsburg |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 0% | 100% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 0% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 100% | 0% |
Mitteldeutscher BC is +26% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
| Conceded Per Game | Mitteldeutscher BC | EnBW Ludwigsburg |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 0% | 100% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 0% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 100% | 0% |
Mitteldeutscher BC is +26% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
| Conceded Per Game | Mitteldeutscher BC | EnBW Ludwigsburg |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 0% | 100% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 0% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 100% | 0% |
Defensive Matchup
Edge Style vs Style
Defensive Pressure & Disruption
Who Forces Mistakes?
Total Points Hit-Rate
Scoring trends 10 & seasone games
| Match Points | Mitteldeutscher BC | EnBW Ludwigsburg | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 140.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Over 150.5 | 50% | 100% | 75% |
| Over 160.5 | 50% | 100% | 75% |
| Over 170.5 | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| Over 180.5 | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| Over 190.5 | 0% | 50% | 25% |
| Over 200.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Mitteldeutscher BC | EnBW Ludwigsburg | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 140.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Under 150.5 | 50% | 0% | 25% |
| Under 160.5 | 50% | 0% | 25% |
| Under 170.5 | 100% | 0% | 50% |
| Under 180.5 | 100% | 0% | 50% |
| Under 190.5 | 100% | 50% | 75% |
| Under 200.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Match Points | Mitteldeutscher BC | EnBW Ludwigsburg | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 140.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Over 150.5 | 50% | 100% | 75% |
| Over 160.5 | 50% | 100% | 75% |
| Over 170.5 | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| Over 180.5 | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| Over 190.5 | 0% | 50% | 25% |
| Over 200.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Mitteldeutscher BC | EnBW Ludwigsburg | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 140.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Under 150.5 | 50% | 0% | 25% |
| Under 160.5 | 50% | 0% | 25% |
| Under 170.5 | 100% | 0% | 50% |
| Under 180.5 | 100% | 0% | 50% |
| Under 190.5 | 100% | 50% | 75% |
| Under 200.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Match Points | Mitteldeutscher BC | EnBW Ludwigsburg | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 140.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Over 150.5 | 50% | 100% | 75% |
| Over 160.5 | 50% | 100% | 75% |
| Over 170.5 | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| Over 180.5 | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| Over 190.5 | 0% | 50% | 25% |
| Over 200.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Mitteldeutscher BC | EnBW Ludwigsburg | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 140.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Under 150.5 | 50% | 0% | 25% |
| Under 160.5 | 50% | 0% | 25% |
| Under 170.5 | 100% | 0% | 50% |
| Under 180.5 | 100% | 0% | 50% |
| Under 190.5 | 100% | 50% | 75% |
| Under 200.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Match Points | Mitteldeutscher BC | EnBW Ludwigsburg | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 140.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Over 150.5 | 50% | 100% | 75% |
| Over 160.5 | 50% | 100% | 75% |
| Over 170.5 | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| Over 180.5 | 0% | 100% | 50% |
| Over 190.5 | 0% | 50% | 25% |
| Over 200.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Mitteldeutscher BC | EnBW Ludwigsburg | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 140.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Under 150.5 | 50% | 0% | 25% |
| Under 160.5 | 50% | 0% | 25% |
| Under 170.5 | 100% | 0% | 50% |
| Under 180.5 | 100% | 0% | 50% |
| Under 190.5 | 100% | 50% | 75% |
| Under 200.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Mitteldeutscher BC -
Player Projections
Small sample for some players
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Charles Callison | |||||||||||||
| Moritz Heck | |||||||||||||
| Spencer Reaves | |||||||||||||
| Akeem Vargas | |||||||||||||
| Mika Siegert | |||||||||||||
| Collin Welp | |||||||||||||
| RJ Gunn | |||||||||||||
| Jure Planinic | |||||||||||||
| Mohamed Ibrahim Younes Mohamed | |||||||||||||
| Khyri Thomas | |||||||||||||
| Abdul Wafa | |||||||||||||
| Kresimir Nikic | |||||||||||||
| Milo Dalchau | |||||||||||||
| Stephon Jelks | |||||||||||||
| John Bryant | |||||||||||||
| Perttu Blomgren | |||||||||||||
| Marcus Foster |
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Charles Callison | |||||||||||||
| Moritz Heck | |||||||||||||
| Spencer Reaves | |||||||||||||
| Akeem Vargas | |||||||||||||
| Mika Siegert | |||||||||||||
| Collin Welp | |||||||||||||
| RJ Gunn | |||||||||||||
| Jure Planinic | |||||||||||||
| Mohamed Ibrahim Younes Mohamed | |||||||||||||
| Khyri Thomas | |||||||||||||
| Abdul Wafa | |||||||||||||
| Kresimir Nikic | |||||||||||||
| Milo Dalchau | |||||||||||||
| Stephon Jelks | |||||||||||||
| John Bryant | |||||||||||||
| Perttu Blomgren | |||||||||||||
| Marcus Foster |
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Charles Callison | |||||||||||||
| Moritz Heck | |||||||||||||
| Spencer Reaves | |||||||||||||
| Akeem Vargas | |||||||||||||
| Mika Siegert | |||||||||||||
| Collin Welp | |||||||||||||
| RJ Gunn | |||||||||||||
| Jure Planinic | |||||||||||||
| Mohamed Ibrahim Younes Mohamed | |||||||||||||
| Khyri Thomas | |||||||||||||
| Abdul Wafa | |||||||||||||
| Kresimir Nikic | |||||||||||||
| Milo Dalchau | |||||||||||||
| Stephon Jelks | |||||||||||||
| John Bryant | |||||||||||||
| Perttu Blomgren | |||||||||||||
| Marcus Foster |
EnBW Ludwigsburg -
Player Projections
Small sample for some players
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Johannes Patrick | |||||||||||||
| Yorman Polas Bartolo | |||||||||||||
| Brandon Tischler | |||||||||||||
| Jonas Wohlfarth-Bottermann | |||||||||||||
| Julis Baumer | |||||||||||||
| Lenny Anigbata | |||||||||||||
| Simon Feneberg | |||||||||||||
| Elijah Hughes | |||||||||||||
| Babacar Sane | |||||||||||||
| Lukas Modic | |||||||||||||
| Maxwell Dongo Temoka | |||||||||||||
| Traveon Buchanan | |||||||||||||
| Lars Danziger | |||||||||||||
| Keeshawn Kellman | |||||||||||||
| Stefan Smith | |||||||||||||
| Josh Behrendt | |||||||||||||
| Marko Masic | |||||||||||||
| Abdulhay Kömürkara | |||||||||||||
| Toms Skuja |
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Johannes Patrick | |||||||||||||
| Yorman Polas Bartolo | |||||||||||||
| Brandon Tischler | |||||||||||||
| Jonas Wohlfarth-Bottermann | |||||||||||||
| Julis Baumer | |||||||||||||
| Lenny Anigbata | |||||||||||||
| Simon Feneberg | |||||||||||||
| Elijah Hughes | |||||||||||||
| Babacar Sane | |||||||||||||
| Lukas Modic | |||||||||||||
| Maxwell Dongo Temoka | |||||||||||||
| Traveon Buchanan | |||||||||||||
| Lars Danziger | |||||||||||||
| Keeshawn Kellman | |||||||||||||
| Stefan Smith | |||||||||||||
| Josh Behrendt | |||||||||||||
| Marko Masic | |||||||||||||
| Abdulhay Kömürkara | |||||||||||||
| Toms Skuja |
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Johannes Patrick | |||||||||||||
| Yorman Polas Bartolo | |||||||||||||
| Brandon Tischler | |||||||||||||
| Jonas Wohlfarth-Bottermann | |||||||||||||
| Julis Baumer | |||||||||||||
| Lenny Anigbata | |||||||||||||
| Simon Feneberg | |||||||||||||
| Elijah Hughes | |||||||||||||
| Babacar Sane | |||||||||||||
| Lukas Modic | |||||||||||||
| Maxwell Dongo Temoka | |||||||||||||
| Traveon Buchanan | |||||||||||||
| Lars Danziger | |||||||||||||
| Keeshawn Kellman | |||||||||||||
| Stefan Smith | |||||||||||||
| Josh Behrendt | |||||||||||||
| Marko Masic | |||||||||||||
| Abdulhay Kömürkara | |||||||||||||
| Toms Skuja |
Roasters & Injured Players
| # | Team | W | L | PCT | PPG | OPP PPG | DIFF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bayern Munchen | 6 | 1 | 0.857 | 85.3 | 76.6 | 8.7 |
| 2 | Mitteldeutscher BC | 6 | 2 | 0.750 | 86.5 | 82.1 | 4.4 |
| 3 | TBB Trier | 6 | 2 | 0.750 | 88.8 | 87.0 | 1.8 |
| 4 | Alba Berlin | 5 | 2 | 0.714 | 87.0 | 81.0 | 6.0 |
| 5 | EnBW Ludwigsburg | 5 | 2 | 0.714 | 85.9 | 84.1 | 1.7 |
| 6 | Skyliners Frankfurt | 5 | 3 | 0.625 | 86.4 | 82.5 | 3.9 |
| 7 | Würzburg | 5 | 3 | 0.625 | 79.4 | 80.8 | -1.4 |
| 8 | Brose Bamberg | 4 | 3 | 0.571 | 91.9 | 83.6 | 8.3 |
| 9 | Jena | 4 | 3 | 0.571 | 87.0 | 89.7 | -2.7 |
| 10 | Chemcats Chemnitz | 4 | 4 | 0.500 | 89.5 | 86.0 | 3.5 |
| 11 | Telekom Baskets Bonn | 4 | 4 | 0.500 | 75.5 | 77.1 | -1.6 |
| 12 | RASTA Vechta | 3 | 4 | 0.429 | 83.4 | 85.3 | -1.9 |
| 13 | Rostock Seawolves | 3 | 4 | 0.429 | 82.1 | 82.4 | -0.3 |
| 14 | Ratiopharm Ulm | 3 | 5 | 0.375 | 81.1 | 81.1 | 0.0 |
| 15 | Basketball Löwen Braunschweig | 3 | 5 | 0.375 | 80.3 | 85.0 | -4.8 |
| 16 | MLP Academics Heidelberg | 1 | 7 | 0.125 | 78.8 | 82.8 | -4.0 |
| 17 | EWE Baskets Oldenburg | 1 | 7 | 0.125 | 82.1 | 87.1 | -5.0 |
| 18 | Hamburg | 0 | 7 | 0.000 | 76.9 | 93.0 | -16.1 |