Scoring Intelligence Panel
Mt Gambier vs Frankston Blues
Scoring Momentum (Recent Form)
| Metric | Mt Gambier | Frankston Blues |
|---|---|---|
| Average Total Points (Last 5 Games) | 167.00 | 194.00 |
| Previous 5 Avg | 190.60 | 183.60 |
| Trend Line (Last 5 Games) | 178, 140, 181, 164, 172 | 237, 187, 169, 207, 170 |
Team performance vs top opponents
scoring, conceding, and net rating.
| Metric | Mt Gambier | Frankston Blues |
|---|---|---|
| Avg Pts vs Top 5 Def | 96.3 | 78.5 |
| Avg Pts Conceded vs Top 5 Off | 87.3 | 101.5 |
| Net Rating vs Top 5 Opps | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Recent momentum
last 5 vs previous 5 games.
| Period | Avg Points Scored | Avg Points Conceded | Net Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last 5 | 94.0 | 72.2 | +21.8 |
| Previous 5 | 95.8 | 85.6 | +10.2 |
| Period | Avg Points Scored | Avg Points Conceded | Net Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last 5 | 93.8 | 99.2 | -5.4 |
| Previous 5 | 91.6 | 94.0 | -2.4 |
Mt Gambier
Australia - National Basketball League1 South
League Pos.
2 / 19
| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall |
W
W
W
W
W
|
96.10 |
| Home |
W
W
W
L
L
|
91.40 |
| Away |
W
W
L
W
W
|
100.36 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 71.4% | 70.0% | 72.7% |
| Total Points Avg | 179.2 | 170.6 | 187 |
| Scored | 96.10 | 91.40 | 100.36 |
| Conceded | 83.10 | 79.20 | 86.64 |
| Pace Avg | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Off. Rating | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Def. Rating | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ATS Cover % | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Frankston Blues
Australia - National Basketball League1 South
League Pos.
12 / 19
| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall |
L
L
W
L
L
|
93.10 |
| Home |
L
L
L
L
L
|
96.64 |
| Away |
W
L
L
W
W
|
88.78 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 45.0% | 45.5% | 44.4% |
| Total Points Avg | 183.35 | 190.73 | 174.34 |
| Scored | 93.10 | 96.64 | 88.78 |
| Conceded | 90.25 | 94.09 | 85.56 |
| Pace Avg | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Off. Rating | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Def. Rating | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ATS Cover % | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Scoring consistency tracker
Last 10 games & full season
Mt Gambier is +1% better in terms of Points Scored
| Scored Per Game | Mt Gambier | Frankston Blues |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 33% | 33% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 67% | 67% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 0% | 0% |
Frankston Blues is +1% better in terms of Points Scored
| Scored Per Game | Mt Gambier | Frankston Blues |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 40% | 40% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 40% | 40% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 20% | 20% |
Mt Gambier is +3% better in terms of Points Scored
| Scored Per Game | Mt Gambier | Frankston Blues |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 30% | 22% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 50% | 56% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 20% | 22% |
Mt Gambier is +3% better in terms of Points Scored
| Scored Per Game | Mt Gambier | Frankston Blues |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 30% | 22% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 50% | 56% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 20% | 22% |
Offensive Efficiency & Shooting Profile
Where Teams Gain or Lose Value
Possession Control & Rebounding
Assists. Turnovers. Pace
Defensive Consistency vs Season Average
Last 10 & season games
Mt Gambier is +22% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
| Conceded Per Game | Mt Gambier | Frankston Blues |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 0% | 33% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 33% | 33% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 67% | 33% |
Mt Gambier is +4% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
| Conceded Per Game | Mt Gambier | Frankston Blues |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 40% | 20% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 20% | 20% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 40% | 60% |
Mt Gambier is +7% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
| Conceded Per Game | Mt Gambier | Frankston Blues |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 20% | 33% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 20% | 22% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 60% | 44% |
Mt Gambier is +7% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
| Conceded Per Game | Mt Gambier | Frankston Blues |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 20% | 33% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 20% | 22% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 60% | 44% |
Defensive Matchup
Edge Style vs Style
Defensive Pressure & Disruption
Who Forces Mistakes?
Total Points Hit-Rate
Scoring trends 10 & seasone games
| Match Points | Mt Gambier | Frankston Blues | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 140.5 | 90% | 100% | 95% |
| Over 150.5 | 90% | 100% | 95% |
| Over 160.5 | 80% | 78% | 79% |
| Over 170.5 | 60% | 44% | 53% |
| Over 180.5 | 20% | 22% | 21% |
| Over 190.5 | 10% | 11% | 11% |
| Over 200.5 | 0% | 11% | 5% |
| Over 210.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Mt Gambier | Frankston Blues | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 140.5 | 10% | 0% | 5% |
| Under 150.5 | 10% | 0% | 5% |
| Under 160.5 | 20% | 22% | 21% |
| Under 170.5 | 40% | 56% | 47% |
| Under 180.5 | 80% | 78% | 79% |
| Under 190.5 | 90% | 89% | 89% |
| Under 200.5 | 100% | 89% | 95% |
| Under 210.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Match Points | Mt Gambier | Frankston Blues | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 140.5 | 33% | 67% | 50% |
| Over 150.5 | 33% | 67% | 50% |
| Over 160.5 | 33% | 67% | 50% |
| Over 170.5 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| Over 180.5 | 0% | 33% | 17% |
| Over 190.5 | 0% | 33% | 17% |
| Over 200.5 | 0% | 33% | 17% |
| Over 210.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Mt Gambier | Frankston Blues | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 140.5 | 67% | 33% | 50% |
| Under 150.5 | 67% | 33% | 50% |
| Under 160.5 | 67% | 33% | 50% |
| Under 170.5 | 67% | 67% | 67% |
| Under 180.5 | 100% | 67% | 83% |
| Under 190.5 | 100% | 67% | 83% |
| Under 200.5 | 100% | 67% | 83% |
| Under 210.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Match Points | Mt Gambier | Frankston Blues | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 140.5 | 60% | 80% | 70% |
| Over 150.5 | 60% | 80% | 70% |
| Over 160.5 | 60% | 60% | 60% |
| Over 170.5 | 60% | 20% | 40% |
| Over 180.5 | 0% | 20% | 10% |
| Over 190.5 | 0% | 20% | 10% |
| Over 200.5 | 0% | 20% | 10% |
| Over 210.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Mt Gambier | Frankston Blues | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 140.5 | 40% | 20% | 30% |
| Under 150.5 | 40% | 20% | 30% |
| Under 160.5 | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| Under 170.5 | 40% | 80% | 60% |
| Under 180.5 | 100% | 80% | 90% |
| Under 190.5 | 100% | 80% | 90% |
| Under 200.5 | 100% | 80% | 90% |
| Under 210.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Match Points | Mt Gambier | Frankston Blues | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 140.5 | 80% | 100% | 89% |
| Over 150.5 | 80% | 100% | 89% |
| Over 160.5 | 70% | 78% | 74% |
| Over 170.5 | 60% | 44% | 53% |
| Over 180.5 | 20% | 22% | 21% |
| Over 190.5 | 10% | 11% | 11% |
| Over 200.5 | 0% | 11% | 5% |
| Over 210.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Mt Gambier | Frankston Blues | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 140.5 | 20% | 0% | 11% |
| Under 150.5 | 20% | 0% | 11% |
| Under 160.5 | 30% | 22% | 26% |
| Under 170.5 | 40% | 56% | 47% |
| Under 180.5 | 80% | 78% | 79% |
| Under 190.5 | 90% | 89% | 89% |
| Under 200.5 | 100% | 89% | 95% |
| Under 210.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| # | Team | W | L | PCT | PPG | OPP PPG | DIFF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Knox Raiders | 17 | 5 | 0.773 | 91.7 | 84.4 | - |
| 2 | Mt Gambier | 16 | 6 | 0.727 | 96.5 | 82.4 | - |
| 3 | Kilsyth Cobras | 14 | 8 | 0.636 | 89.3 | 86.0 | - |
| 4 | Eltham Wildcats | 14 | 8 | 0.636 | 89.9 | 85.6 | - |
| 5 | Sandringham Sabres | 14 | 8 | 0.636 | 94.1 | 89.9 | - |
| 6 | Melbourne Tigers | 14 | 8 | 0.636 | 87.6 | 82.1 | - |
| 7 | Ballarat Miners | 14 | 8 | 0.636 | 87.9 | 88.9 | - |
| 8 | Hobart Chargers | 12 | 9 | 0.571 | 88.7 | 86.5 | - |
| 9 | Nunawading Spectres | 11 | 11 | 0.500 | 87.4 | 86.4 | - |
| 10 | Ringwood Hawks | 11 | 11 | 0.500 | 95.1 | 90.8 | - |
| 11 | Casey Cavaliers | 11 | 11 | 0.500 | 87.8 | 86.4 | - |
| 12 | Frankston Blues | 10 | 12 | 0.455 | 92.6 | 91.0 | - |
| 13 | Waverley Falcons | 9 | 13 | 0.409 | 93.7 | 96.6 | - |
| 14 | Dandenong Rangers | 8 | 14 | 0.364 | 91.1 | 95.5 | - |
| 15 | Keilor Thunder | 8 | 14 | 0.364 | 82.4 | 88.1 | - |
| 16 | Bendigo Braves | 8 | 14 | 0.364 | 81.7 | 94.3 | - |
| 17 | Geelong Supercats | 7 | 15 | 0.318 | 81.9 | 88.5 | - |
| 18 | NW Tasmania Thunder | 5 | 16 | 0.238 | 86.5 | 92.4 | - |
| 19 | Diamond Valley Eagles | 5 | 17 | 0.227 | 84.5 | 95.0 | - |