79.40
W
W
W
L
W
Paulistano Amil
Brazil
Saturday Nov 15, 2025 - 15:00 (America/New_York)
Paulistano Amil vs Flamengo
Stats, H2H, Live Scores & xG
89.33
W
W
W
W
W
Flamengo
Scoring Intelligence Panel
Paulistano Amil vs Flamengo
N/A
Possessions / Game
League Average: N/A
157
Points / Match
League Average: 157
15.6
( High )
Volatility
League Average: 13.1
🟢 Green = favorable situation (high pace, strong over trend, or very stable totals) ✅ ·
⚪ Gray = neutral, close to league average 👌 ·
🟡 Yellow / 🟠 Orange = warning, results can swing more than usual ⚠️ ·
🔴 Red = unfavorable / high risk (low pace for overs, strong under lean, or very volatile games) ❌
Head to Head Statistics
Paulistano Amil vs Flamengo
All Time
Last 3 Games
33%
Over 147.5
10 / 30
43%
Over 157.5
13 / 30
23%
Over 167.5
7 / 30
🟢 Green = value ✅ ·
🟡 Yellow = risky ⚠️ ·
🔴 Red = skip ❌
33%
Over 147.5
1 / 3
67%
Over 157.5
2 / 3
0%
Over 167.5
0 / 3
🟢 Green = value ✅ ·
🟡 Yellow = risky ⚠️ ·
🔴 Red = skip ❌
Scoring Momentum (Recent Form)
| Metric | Paulistano Amil | Flamengo |
|---|---|---|
| Average Total Points (Last 5 Games) | 154.80 | 158.60 |
| Previous 5 Avg | 0 | 0 |
| Trend Line (Last 5 Games) | 166, 175, 157, 151, 125 | 158, 164, 155, 136, 180 |
🟢 Green = value ✅ ·
🟡 Yellow = risky ⚠️ ·
🔴 Red = skip ❌
Team performance vs top opponents
scoring, conceding, and net rating.
| Metric | Paulistano Amil | Flamengo |
|---|---|---|
| Avg Pts vs Top 5 Def | 67.5 | 84.5 |
| Avg Pts Conceded vs Top 5 Off | 73.5 | 78.5 |
| Net Rating vs Top 5 Opps | 0.0 | 0.0 |
🟢 Green = value ✅ ·
🟡 Yellow = risky ⚠️ ·
🔴 Red = skip ❌ —
Values are compared to the team's own season average.
These indicators reflect performance against top opponents (TOP 5 offenses and defenses) and help assess true team strength.
Recent momentum
last 5 vs previous 5 games.
Paulistano Amil
Flamengo
| Period | Avg Points Scored | Avg Points Conceded | Net Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last 5 | 85.4 | 78.6 | +6.8 |
| Previous 5 | 79.2 | 77.6 | +1.6 |
| Period | Avg Points Scored | Avg Points Conceded | Net Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last 5 | 87.2 | 74.4 | +12.8 |
| Previous 5 | 90.0 | 71.2 | +18.8 |
🟢 Green = improving form 📈 ·
🟡 Yellow = neutral ➖ ·
🔴 Red = declining form 📉 —
Momentum analysis shows whether the team has recently been improving in offense and defense, or on the contrary – losing stability.
Paulistano Amil
Brazil - Novo Basquete Brasil
League Pos.
9 / 20
| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall |
W
W
W
W
L
|
79.00 |
| Home |
W
W
W
L
W
|
79.40 |
| Away |
W
L
L
|
78.33 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 62.5% | 80.0% | 33.3% |
| Total Points Avg | 151.88 | 147.8 | 158.66 |
| Scored | 79.00 | 79.40 | 78.33 |
| Conceded | 72.88 | 68.40 | 80.33 |
| Pace Avg | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Off. Rating | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Def. Rating | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ATS Cover % | 0% | 0% | 0% |
* Pace is not a value indicator but shows game tempo — higher numbers mean faster play and more possessions.
Flamengo
Brazil - Novo Basquete Brasil
League Pos.
1 / 20
| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall |
W
W
W
W
W
|
91.00 |
| Home |
W
W
W
|
94.33 |
| Away |
W
W
W
W
W
|
89.33 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Total Points Avg | 162.89 | 163 | 162.83 |
| Scored | 91.00 | 94.33 | 89.33 |
| Conceded | 71.89 | 68.67 | 73.50 |
| Pace Avg | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Off. Rating | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Def. Rating | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ATS Cover % | 0% | 0% | 0% |
* Pace is not a value indicator but shows game tempo — higher numbers mean faster play and more possessions.
Scoring consistency tracker
Last 10 games & full season
Last 3
Last 5
Last 10 ⚠️
Season
Paulistano Amil is +8% better in terms of Points Scored
Paulistano Amil at Home
Flamengo at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Scored Per Game | Paulistano Amil | Flamengo |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 33% | 67% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 67% | 0% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 0% | 33% |
🟢 Green = potential value signal · 🟡 Yellow = needs confirmation · 🔴 Red = caution. Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Flamengo is +9% better in terms of Points Scored
Paulistano Amil at Home
Flamengo at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Scored Per Game | Paulistano Amil | Flamengo |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 20% | 80% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 40% | 0% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 40% | 20% |
🟢 Green = potential value signal · 🟡 Yellow = needs confirmation · 🔴 Red = caution. Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Flamengo is +12% better in terms of Points Scored
Paulistano Amil at Home
Flamengo at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Scored Per Game | Paulistano Amil | Flamengo |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 20% | 83% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 40% | 0% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 40% | 17% |
🟢 Green = potential value signal · 🟡 Yellow = needs confirmation · 🔴 Red = caution. Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Flamengo is +12% better in terms of Points Scored
Paulistano Amil at Home
Flamengo at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Scored Per Game | Paulistano Amil | Flamengo |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 20% | 83% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 40% | 0% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 40% | 17% |
🟢 Green = potential value signal · 🟡 Yellow = needs confirmation · 🔴 Red = caution. Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Offensive Efficiency & Shooting Profile
Where Teams Gain or Lose Value
🟢 Green = strong efficiency or shooting edge · 🟡 Yellow = balanced/average · 🔴 Red = weakness, needs caution. Some stats (like 3P Rate and FT Rate) indicate playing style, not necessarily good or bad — interpret in context.
Possession Control & Rebounding
Assists. Turnovers. Pace
Defensive Consistency vs Season Average
Last 10 & season games
Last 3
Last 5
Last 10 ⚠️
Season
Flamengo is +3% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
Paulistano Amil at Home
Flamengo at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Conceded Per Game | Paulistano Amil | Flamengo |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 0% | 0% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 0% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 100% | 100% |
🟢 Green = strong defensive hold (unders-friendly) · 🟡 Yellow = neutral · 🔴 Red = weak defense (overs risk). Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Paulistano Amil is +4% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
Paulistano Amil at Home
Flamengo at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Conceded Per Game | Paulistano Amil | Flamengo |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 0% | 0% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 20% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 100% | 80% |
🟢 Green = strong defensive hold (unders-friendly) · 🟡 Yellow = neutral · 🔴 Red = weak defense (overs risk). Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Paulistano Amil is +7% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
Paulistano Amil at Home
Flamengo at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Conceded Per Game | Paulistano Amil | Flamengo |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 0% | 17% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 17% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 100% | 67% |
🟢 Green = strong defensive hold (unders-friendly) · 🟡 Yellow = neutral · 🔴 Red = weak defense (overs risk). Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Paulistano Amil is +7% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
Paulistano Amil at Home
Flamengo at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Conceded Per Game | Paulistano Amil | Flamengo |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 0% | 17% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 17% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 100% | 67% |
🟢 Green = strong defensive hold (unders-friendly) · 🟡 Yellow = neutral · 🔴 Red = weak defense (overs risk). Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Defensive Matchup
Edge Style vs Style
🟢 Green = Clear defensive edge (profitable trend) · 🟡 Yellow = Neutral (no big edge) · 🔴 Red = Weak defense / exploitable
Defensive Pressure & Disruption
Who Forces Mistakes?
🟢 Green = Strong edge · 🟡 Yellow = Average · 🔴 Red = Weak edge
* Rate = per 100 possessions. · Others = per game averages.
Total Points Hit-Rate
Scoring trends 10 & seasone games
Last 3
Last 5
Last 10 ⚠️
Season
Over X Points
Under X Points
| Match Points | Paulistano Amil | Flamengo | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 120.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Over 130.5 | 80% | 100% | 91% |
| Over 140.5 | 60% | 83% | 73% |
| Over 150.5 | 60% | 83% | 73% |
| Over 160.5 | 20% | 33% | 27% |
| Over 170.5 | 0% | 33% | 18% |
| Over 180.5 | 0% | 17% | 9% |
| Over 190.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Paulistano Amil | Flamengo | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 120.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Under 130.5 | 20% | 0% | 9% |
| Under 140.5 | 40% | 17% | 27% |
| Under 150.5 | 40% | 17% | 27% |
| Under 160.5 | 80% | 67% | 73% |
| Under 170.5 | 100% | 67% | 82% |
| Under 180.5 | 100% | 83% | 91% |
| Under 190.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
🟢 Green = Strong over-trend· 🟡 Yellow = Balanced · 🔴 Red = Weak over-trend
Over X Points
Under X Points
| Match Points | Paulistano Amil | Flamengo | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 150.5 | 67% | 67% | 67% |
| Over 160.5 | 33% | 0% | 17% |
| Over 170.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Paulistano Amil | Flamengo | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 150.5 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| Under 160.5 | 67% | 100% | 83% |
| Under 170.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
🟢 Green = Strong over-trend· 🟡 Yellow = Balanced · 🔴 Red = Weak over-trend
Over X Points
Under X Points
| Match Points | Paulistano Amil | Flamengo | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 130.5 | 80% | 80% | 80% |
| Over 140.5 | 60% | 60% | 60% |
| Over 150.5 | 60% | 60% | 60% |
| Over 160.5 | 20% | 20% | 20% |
| Over 170.5 | 0% | 20% | 10% |
| Over 180.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Paulistano Amil | Flamengo | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 130.5 | 20% | 20% | 20% |
| Under 140.5 | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| Under 150.5 | 40% | 40% | 40% |
| Under 160.5 | 80% | 80% | 80% |
| Under 170.5 | 100% | 80% | 90% |
| Under 180.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
🟢 Green = Strong over-trend· 🟡 Yellow = Balanced · 🔴 Red = Weak over-trend
Over X Points
Under X Points
| Match Points | Paulistano Amil | Flamengo | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 120.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Over 130.5 | 80% | 100% | 91% |
| Over 140.5 | 60% | 83% | 73% |
| Over 150.5 | 60% | 83% | 73% |
| Over 160.5 | 20% | 33% | 27% |
| Over 170.5 | 0% | 33% | 18% |
| Over 180.5 | 0% | 17% | 9% |
| Over 190.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Paulistano Amil | Flamengo | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 120.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Under 130.5 | 20% | 0% | 9% |
| Under 140.5 | 40% | 17% | 27% |
| Under 150.5 | 40% | 17% | 27% |
| Under 160.5 | 80% | 67% | 73% |
| Under 170.5 | 100% | 67% | 82% |
| Under 180.5 | 100% | 83% | 91% |
| Under 190.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
🟢 Green = Strong over-trend· 🟡 Yellow = Balanced · 🔴 Red = Weak over-trend
Paulistano Amil -
Player Projections
Small sample for some players
Last 5 Games
Last 10 Games
Season
List of OUT players:
Reset all to IN
List of OUT players:
Reset all to IN
List of OUT players:
Reset all to IN
* Colored values are our “value check” candidates. Always compare with market lines before deciding.
Flamengo -
Player Projections
Small sample for some players
Last 5 Games
Last 10 Games
Season
OUT Players
Reset all to IN
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Renato da Cruz Nascimento | |||||||||||||
| Emanuel Fernandes de Lima e Silva | |||||||||||||
| Matheus de Carvalho Gueiros | |||||||||||||
| Gustavo Nicolas Aguirre | |||||||||||||
| Jose Ignacio Vildoza | |||||||||||||
| Carlos Alexandre Rodrigues do Nascimento | |||||||||||||
| Lucas Martinez | |||||||||||||
| Ricardo Fischer | |||||||||||||
| Rafael Hettsheimeir | |||||||||||||
| Guilherme Pereira Deodato | |||||||||||||
| Gabriel Crepaldi Volpato Galvanini | |||||||||||||
| Rafael Mineiro | |||||||||||||
| Martin Nicolas Cuello |
OUT Players
Reset all to IN
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Renato da Cruz Nascimento | |||||||||||||
| Emanuel Fernandes de Lima e Silva | |||||||||||||
| Matheus de Carvalho Gueiros | |||||||||||||
| Gustavo Nicolas Aguirre | |||||||||||||
| Jose Ignacio Vildoza | |||||||||||||
| Carlos Alexandre Rodrigues do Nascimento | |||||||||||||
| Lucas Martinez | |||||||||||||
| Ricardo Fischer | |||||||||||||
| Rafael Hettsheimeir | |||||||||||||
| Guilherme Pereira Deodato | |||||||||||||
| Gabriel Crepaldi Volpato Galvanini | |||||||||||||
| Rafael Mineiro | |||||||||||||
| Martin Nicolas Cuello |
OUT Players
Reset all to IN
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Renato da Cruz Nascimento | |||||||||||||
| Emanuel Fernandes de Lima e Silva | |||||||||||||
| Matheus de Carvalho Gueiros | |||||||||||||
| Gustavo Nicolas Aguirre | |||||||||||||
| Jose Ignacio Vildoza | |||||||||||||
| Carlos Alexandre Rodrigues do Nascimento | |||||||||||||
| Lucas Martinez | |||||||||||||
| Ricardo Fischer | |||||||||||||
| Rafael Hettsheimeir | |||||||||||||
| Guilherme Pereira Deodato | |||||||||||||
| Gabriel Crepaldi Volpato Galvanini | |||||||||||||
| Rafael Mineiro | |||||||||||||
| Martin Nicolas Cuello |
* Colored values are our “value check” candidates. Always compare with market lines before deciding.
Roasters & Injured Players
Paulistano Amil
Flamengo
Roasters
Injured
No injured players listed for either team.
| # | Team | W | L | PCT | PPG | OPP PPG | DIFF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Flamengo | 11 | 1 | 0.917 | 89.0 | 73.7 | - |
| 2 | Pitagoras Minas | 10 | 2 | 0.833 | 86.1 | 77.2 | - |
| 3 | CAIXA Brasília Basquete | 9 | 2 | 0.818 | 83.2 | 69.8 | - |
| 4 | Corinthians | 8 | 2 | 0.800 | 84.8 | 74.6 | - |
| 5 | E.c. Pinheiros Sao Paolo | 8 | 2 | 0.800 | 84.3 | 76.5 | - |
| 6 | Vivo Franca | 9 | 3 | 0.750 | 86.1 | 73.0 | - |
| 7 | Mogi das Cruzes | 8 | 3 | 0.727 | 82.7 | 66.1 | - |
| 8 | Sao Jose | 6 | 4 | 0.600 | 77.5 | 75.0 | - |
| 9 | Paulistano Amil | 7 | 5 | 0.583 | 79.8 | 75.9 | - |
| 10 | Unifacisa | 5 | 5 | 0.500 | 79.1 | 79.0 | - |
| 11 | Caxias do Sul | 4 | 5 | 0.444 | 71.6 | 77.4 | - |
| 12 | GRSA Itabom Bauru | 5 | 7 | 0.417 | 72.8 | 75.7 | - |
| 13 | Uniao Corinthians | 4 | 6 | 0.400 | 75.7 | 85.1 | - |
| 14 | Fortaleza B. C. | 3 | 7 | 0.300 | 79.1 | 84.5 | - |
| 15 | Botafogo | 3 | 8 | 0.273 | 70.8 | 80.1 | - |
| 16 | Rio Claro Basquete | 3 | 9 | 0.250 | 76.7 | 88.9 | - |
| 17 | Cruzeiro | 3 | 9 | 0.250 | 77.5 | 87.4 | - |
| 18 | Osasco | 3 | 9 | 0.250 | 75.8 | 86.6 | - |
| 19 | Pato | 2 | 10 | 0.167 | 70.3 | 81.0 | - |
| 20 | SC Vasco da Gama | 0 | 12 | 0.000 | 66.0 | 80.2 | - |
Monthly & Opponent Breakdown (How to Use)
Compares a team/player’s overall averages to their performance vs a specific opponent.
Why it’s useful:
Betting use:
Game Outcome Summary (How to Use)