81.50
L
L
Sabah Baku
Wednesday Dec 10, 2025 - 11:00 (America/New_York)
Sabah Baku vs CEZ Nymburk
Stats, H2H, Live Scores & xG
78.00
L
CEZ Nymburk
Note: The current season has recently started, and one or both teams have played fewer than 5 matches.
Scoring Intelligence Panel
Sabah Baku vs CEZ Nymburk
N/A
Possessions / Game
League Average: N/A
167
Points / Match
League Average: 164
10.5
( Medium )
Volatility
League Average: N/A
🟢 Green = favorable situation (high pace, strong over trend, or very stable totals) ✅ ·
⚪ Gray = neutral, close to league average 👌 ·
🟡 Yellow / 🟠 Orange = warning, results can swing more than usual ⚠️ ·
🔴 Red = unfavorable / high risk (low pace for overs, strong under lean, or very volatile games) ❌
Head to Head Statistics
Sabah Baku vs CEZ Nymburk
All Time
Last 3 Games
0%
Over 154.5
0 / 2
50%
Over 164.5
1 / 2
50%
Over 174.5
1 / 2
🟢 Green = value ✅ ·
🟡 Yellow = risky ⚠️ ·
🔴 Red = skip ❌
0%
Over 154.5
0 / 2
50%
Over 164.5
1 / 2
50%
Over 174.5
1 / 2
🟢 Green = value ✅ ·
🟡 Yellow = risky ⚠️ ·
🔴 Red = skip ❌
Scoring Momentum (Recent Form)
| Metric | Sabah Baku | CEZ Nymburk |
|---|---|---|
| Average Total Points (Last 5 Games) | 162.50 | 171.25 |
| Previous 5 Avg | 0 | 0 |
| Trend Line (Last 5 Games) | 176, 155, 161, 158 | 163, 172, 192, 158 |
🟢 Green = value ✅ ·
🟡 Yellow = risky ⚠️ ·
🔴 Red = skip ❌
Team performance vs top opponents
scoring, conceding, and net rating.
| Metric | Sabah Baku | CEZ Nymburk |
|---|---|---|
| Avg Pts vs Top 5 Def | 65.0 | 93.0 |
| Avg Pts Conceded vs Top 5 Off | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Net Rating vs Top 5 Opps | 0.0 | 0.0 |
🟢 Green = value ✅ ·
🟡 Yellow = risky ⚠️ ·
🔴 Red = skip ❌ —
Values are compared to the team's own season average.
These indicators reflect performance against top opponents (TOP 5 offenses and defenses) and help assess true team strength.
Sabah Baku
Basketball Champions League
League Pos.
0 / 32
| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall |
L
L
L
L
|
74.75 |
| Home |
L
L
|
81.50 |
| Away |
L
L
|
68.00 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total Points Avg | 162.5 | 168.5 | 156.5 |
| Scored | 74.75 | 81.50 | 68.00 |
| Conceded | 87.75 | 87.00 | 88.50 |
| Pace Avg | 75.63 | 75.61 | 75.65 |
| Off. Rating | 99.36 | 108.09 | 90.59 |
| Def. Rating | 86.04 | 86.78 | 85.31 |
| ATS Cover % | 50.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% |
* Pace is not a value indicator but shows game tempo — higher numbers mean faster play and more possessions.
CEZ Nymburk
Basketball Champions League
League Pos.
0 / 32
| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall |
L
L
L
W
|
85.25 |
| Home |
L
L
W
|
87.67 |
| Away |
L
|
78.00 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 25.0% | 33.3% | 0.0% |
| Total Points Avg | 171.25 | 171 | 172 |
| Scored | 85.25 | 87.67 | 78.00 |
| Conceded | 86.00 | 83.33 | 94.00 |
| Pace Avg | 76.92 | 75.22 | 82.04 |
| Off. Rating | 103.93 | 106.77 | 95.35 |
| Def. Rating | 93.90 | 96.40 | 87.23 |
| ATS Cover % | 50.0% | 66.7% | 0.0% |
* Pace is not a value indicator but shows game tempo — higher numbers mean faster play and more possessions.
Scoring consistency tracker
Last 10 games & full season
Last 3 ⚠️
Last 5 ⚠️
Last 10 ⚠️
Season
Sabah Baku is +4% better in terms of Points Scored
Sabah Baku at Home
CEZ Nymburk at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Scored Per Game | Sabah Baku | CEZ Nymburk |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 0% | 0% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 50% | 100% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 50% | 0% |
🟢 Green = potential value signal · 🟡 Yellow = needs confirmation · 🔴 Red = caution. Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Sabah Baku is +4% better in terms of Points Scored
Sabah Baku at Home
CEZ Nymburk at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Scored Per Game | Sabah Baku | CEZ Nymburk |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 0% | 0% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 50% | 100% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 50% | 0% |
🟢 Green = potential value signal · 🟡 Yellow = needs confirmation · 🔴 Red = caution. Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Sabah Baku is +4% better in terms of Points Scored
Sabah Baku at Home
CEZ Nymburk at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Scored Per Game | Sabah Baku | CEZ Nymburk |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 0% | 0% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 50% | 100% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 50% | 0% |
🟢 Green = potential value signal · 🟡 Yellow = needs confirmation · 🔴 Red = caution. Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Sabah Baku is +4% better in terms of Points Scored
Sabah Baku at Home
CEZ Nymburk at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Scored Per Game | Sabah Baku | CEZ Nymburk |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 0% | 0% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 50% | 100% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 50% | 0% |
🟢 Green = potential value signal · 🟡 Yellow = needs confirmation · 🔴 Red = caution. Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Offensive Efficiency & Shooting Profile
Where Teams Gain or Lose Value
🟢 Green = strong efficiency or shooting edge · 🟡 Yellow = balanced/average · 🔴 Red = weakness, needs caution. Some stats (like 3P Rate and FT Rate) indicate playing style, not necessarily good or bad — interpret in context.
Possession Control & Rebounding
Assists. Turnovers. Pace
Defensive Consistency vs Season Average
Last 10 & season games
Last 3 ⚠️
Last 5 ⚠️
Last 10 ⚠️
Season
Sabah Baku is +7% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
Sabah Baku at Home
CEZ Nymburk at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Conceded Per Game | Sabah Baku | CEZ Nymburk |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 50% | 100% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 50% | 0% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 0% | 0% |
🟢 Green = strong defensive hold (unders-friendly) · 🟡 Yellow = neutral · 🔴 Red = weak defense (overs risk). Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Sabah Baku is +7% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
Sabah Baku at Home
CEZ Nymburk at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Conceded Per Game | Sabah Baku | CEZ Nymburk |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 50% | 100% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 50% | 0% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 0% | 0% |
🟢 Green = strong defensive hold (unders-friendly) · 🟡 Yellow = neutral · 🔴 Red = weak defense (overs risk). Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Sabah Baku is +7% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
Sabah Baku at Home
CEZ Nymburk at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Conceded Per Game | Sabah Baku | CEZ Nymburk |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 50% | 100% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 50% | 0% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 0% | 0% |
🟢 Green = strong defensive hold (unders-friendly) · 🟡 Yellow = neutral · 🔴 Red = weak defense (overs risk). Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Sabah Baku is +7% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
Sabah Baku at Home
CEZ Nymburk at Away
Full-Time
Quarters
| Conceded Per Game | Sabah Baku | CEZ Nymburk |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 50% | 100% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 50% | 0% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 0% | 0% |
🟢 Green = strong defensive hold (unders-friendly) · 🟡 Yellow = neutral · 🔴 Red = weak defense (overs risk). Shares are vs the team's own season average in this context.
Defensive Matchup
Edge Style vs Style
🟢 Green = Clear defensive edge (profitable trend) · 🟡 Yellow = Neutral (no big edge) · 🔴 Red = Weak defense / exploitable
Defensive Pressure & Disruption
Who Forces Mistakes?
🟢 Green = Strong edge · 🟡 Yellow = Average · 🔴 Red = Weak edge
* Rate = per 100 possessions. · Others = per game averages.
Total Points Hit-Rate
Scoring trends 10 & seasone games
Last 3 ⚠️
Last 5 ⚠️
Last 10 ⚠️
Season
Over X Points
Under X Points
| Match Points | Sabah Baku | CEZ Nymburk | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 160.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Over 170.5 | 50% | 100% | 67% |
| Over 180.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Sabah Baku | CEZ Nymburk | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 160.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Under 170.5 | 50% | 0% | 33% |
| Under 180.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
🟢 Green = Strong over-trend· 🟡 Yellow = Balanced · 🔴 Red = Weak over-trend
Over X Points
Under X Points
| Match Points | Sabah Baku | CEZ Nymburk | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 160.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Over 170.5 | 50% | 100% | 67% |
| Over 180.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Sabah Baku | CEZ Nymburk | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 160.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Under 170.5 | 50% | 0% | 33% |
| Under 180.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
🟢 Green = Strong over-trend· 🟡 Yellow = Balanced · 🔴 Red = Weak over-trend
Over X Points
Under X Points
| Match Points | Sabah Baku | CEZ Nymburk | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 160.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Over 170.5 | 50% | 100% | 67% |
| Over 180.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Sabah Baku | CEZ Nymburk | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 160.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Under 170.5 | 50% | 0% | 33% |
| Under 180.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
🟢 Green = Strong over-trend· 🟡 Yellow = Balanced · 🔴 Red = Weak over-trend
Over X Points
Under X Points
| Match Points | Sabah Baku | CEZ Nymburk | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 160.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Over 170.5 | 50% | 100% | 67% |
| Over 180.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Sabah Baku | CEZ Nymburk | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 160.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Under 170.5 | 50% | 0% | 33% |
| Under 180.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
🟢 Green = Strong over-trend· 🟡 Yellow = Balanced · 🔴 Red = Weak over-trend
CEZ Nymburk -
Player Projections
Small sample for some players
Last 5 Games
Last 10 Games
Season
OUT Players
Reset all to IN
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Jakub TUMA | |||||||||||||
| J.t. Shumate | |||||||||||||
| Frantisek Rylich | |||||||||||||
| Vojtech Hruban | |||||||||||||
| Ryland Thomas Holt | |||||||||||||
| Peter Kovacik | |||||||||||||
| Stephen Brown | |||||||||||||
| Tylan Birts | |||||||||||||
| Matej SVOBODA | |||||||||||||
| Christian Bishop | |||||||||||||
| Tomas Mikyska | |||||||||||||
| Jaromir Bohacik | |||||||||||||
| Ondrej Sehnal | |||||||||||||
| Nighael Ceaser | |||||||||||||
| Martin Kriz |
OUT Players
Reset all to IN
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Jakub TUMA | |||||||||||||
| J.t. Shumate | |||||||||||||
| Frantisek Rylich | |||||||||||||
| Vojtech Hruban | |||||||||||||
| Ryland Thomas Holt | |||||||||||||
| Peter Kovacik | |||||||||||||
| Stephen Brown | |||||||||||||
| Tylan Birts | |||||||||||||
| Matej SVOBODA | |||||||||||||
| Christian Bishop | |||||||||||||
| Tomas Mikyska | |||||||||||||
| Jaromir Bohacik | |||||||||||||
| Ondrej Sehnal | |||||||||||||
| Nighael Ceaser | |||||||||||||
| Martin Kriz |
OUT Players
Reset all to IN
| Status | Players | MIN | 2PA/G | 3PA/G | FTA/G | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | GP | PRA |
| Jakub TUMA | |||||||||||||
| J.t. Shumate | |||||||||||||
| Frantisek Rylich | |||||||||||||
| Vojtech Hruban | |||||||||||||
| Ryland Thomas Holt | |||||||||||||
| Peter Kovacik | |||||||||||||
| Stephen Brown | |||||||||||||
| Tylan Birts | |||||||||||||
| Matej SVOBODA | |||||||||||||
| Christian Bishop | |||||||||||||
| Tomas Mikyska | |||||||||||||
| Jaromir Bohacik | |||||||||||||
| Ondrej Sehnal | |||||||||||||
| Nighael Ceaser | |||||||||||||
| Martin Kriz |
* Colored values are our “value check” candidates. Always compare with market lines before deciding.
Roasters & Injured Players
Sabah Baku
CEZ Nymburk
Roasters
No roster players listed for this team.
Injured
No injured players listed for either team.
| # | Team | W | L | PCT | PPG | OPP PPG | DIFF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lietuvos Rytas | 4 | 1 | 0.800 | 93.8 | 84.6 | 9.2 |
| 2 | Promitheas Patras B.C. | 2 | 3 | 0.400 | 74.0 | 82.4 | -8.4 |
| 3 | SK Legia Warszawa | 2 | 3 | 0.400 | 77.0 | 75.8 | 1.2 |
| 4 | MLP Academics Heidelberg | 2 | 3 | 0.400 | 82.8 | 84.8 | -2.0 |
| # | Team | W | L | PCT | PPG | OPP PPG | DIFF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chalon/SaÔne | 4 | 0 | 1.000 | 87.8 | 82.3 | 5.5 |
| 2 | Alba Berlin | 3 | 1 | 0.750 | 85.8 | 77.5 | 8.3 |
| 3 | CEZ Nymburk | 1 | 3 | 0.250 | 85.3 | 86.0 | -0.8 |
| 4 | Sabah Baku | 0 | 4 | 0.000 | 74.8 | 87.8 | -13.0 |
| # | Team | W | L | PCT | PPG | OPP PPG | DIFF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DKV Joventut | 5 | 0 | 1.000 | 88.4 | 73.6 | 14.8 |
| 2 | Cholet | 3 | 2 | 0.600 | 90.4 | 87.0 | 3.4 |
| 3 | Hapoel Holon | 2 | 3 | 0.400 | 87.8 | 87.6 | 0.2 |
| 4 | Bursaspor | 0 | 5 | 0.000 | 71.6 | 90.0 | -18.4 |
| # | Team | W | L | PCT | PPG | OPP PPG | DIFF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Isla De Tenerife Canarias | 4 | 0 | 1.000 | 88.3 | 74.3 | 14.0 |
| 2 | Tofas Spor Kulübü | 2 | 2 | 0.500 | 78.8 | 84.0 | -5.3 |
| 3 | Trapani Shark | 2 | 2 | 0.500 | 86.3 | 84.3 | 2.0 |
| 4 | Bnei Herzliya | 0 | 4 | 0.000 | 83.3 | 94.0 | -10.8 |
| # | Team | W | L | PCT | PPG | OPP PPG | DIFF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Galatasaray S.K. | 4 | 1 | 0.800 | 90.4 | 81.8 | 8.6 |
| 2 | Würzburg | 3 | 2 | 0.600 | 78.0 | 75.0 | 3.0 |
| 3 | Pallacanestro Trieste | 2 | 3 | 0.400 | 84.8 | 85.8 | -1.0 |
| 4 | KK Igokea | 1 | 4 | 0.200 | 77.4 | 88.0 | -10.6 |
| # | Team | W | L | PCT | PPG | OPP PPG | DIFF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AEK Athens | 4 | 0 | 1.000 | 81.5 | 65.8 | 15.8 |
| 2 | Szolnoki Olajbanyasz | 2 | 2 | 0.500 | 77.3 | 73.5 | 3.8 |
| 3 | ONYX Levice | 2 | 2 | 0.500 | 72.0 | 74.8 | -2.8 |
| 4 | VEF Riga Juniors | 0 | 4 | 0.000 | 66.5 | 83.3 | -16.8 |
| # | Team | W | L | PCT | PPG | OPP PPG | DIFF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Unicaja Malaga | 4 | 0 | 1.000 | 92.8 | 69.5 | 23.3 |
| 2 | Mersin BSB | 2 | 2 | 0.500 | 82.0 | 89.0 | -7.0 |
| 3 | AS Karditsas B.C. | 2 | 2 | 0.500 | 76.3 | 81.0 | -4.8 |
| 4 | Telindus Oostende | 0 | 4 | 0.000 | 84.3 | 95.8 | -11.5 |
| # | Team | W | L | PCT | PPG | OPP PPG | DIFF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kalise Gran Canaria | 5 | 0 | 1.000 | 86.2 | 72.4 | 13.8 |
| 2 | Subotica Spartak | 3 | 2 | 0.600 | 81.6 | 77.2 | 4.4 |
| 3 | Le Mans Sarthe | 1 | 4 | 0.200 | 81.6 | 79.8 | 1.8 |
| 4 | Lisboa e Benfica | 1 | 4 | 0.200 | 73.2 | 93.2 | -20.0 |
Monthly & Opponent Breakdown (How to Use)
Compares a team/player’s overall averages to their performance vs a specific opponent.
Why it’s useful:
Betting use:
Game Outcome Summary (How to Use)