Scoring Intelligence Panel
Waverley Falcons vs Sandringham Sabres
Scoring Momentum (Recent Form)
| Metric | Waverley Falcons | Sandringham Sabres |
|---|---|---|
| Average Total Points (Last 5 Games) | 190.80 | 184.00 |
| Previous 5 Avg | 185.20 | 190.20 |
| Trend Line (Last 5 Games) | 188, 189, 187, 176, 214 | 139, 163, 215, 217, 186 |
Team performance vs top opponents
scoring, conceding, and net rating.
| Metric | Waverley Falcons | Sandringham Sabres |
|---|---|---|
| Avg Pts vs Top 5 Def | 96.0 | 95.3 |
| Avg Pts Conceded vs Top 5 Off | 100.5 | 88.7 |
| Net Rating vs Top 5 Opps | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Recent momentum
last 5 vs previous 5 games.
| Period | Avg Points Scored | Avg Points Conceded | Net Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last 5 | 96.0 | 103.8 | -7.8 |
| Previous 5 | 101.6 | 94.8 | +6.8 |
| Period | Avg Points Scored | Avg Points Conceded | Net Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last 5 | 99.8 | 82.8 | +17.0 |
| Previous 5 | 97.6 | 88.8 | +8.8 |
Waverley Falcons
Australia - National Basketball League1 South
League Pos.
13 / 19
| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall |
L
L
W
W
W
|
92.89 |
| Home |
W
W
W
L
L
|
93.22 |
| Away |
L
L
W
L
W
|
92.60 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 47.4% | 66.7% | 30.0% |
| Total Points Avg | 187.52 | 181.89 | 192.6 |
| Scored | 92.89 | 93.22 | 92.60 |
| Conceded | 94.63 | 88.67 | 100.00 |
| Pace Avg | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Off. Rating | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Def. Rating | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ATS Cover % | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Sandringham Sabres
Australia - National Basketball League1 South
League Pos.
5 / 19
| Form | Results | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Overall |
W
W
W
W
W
|
91.22 |
| Home |
W
W
W
W
L
|
88.56 |
| Away |
W
W
W
W
W
|
93.89 |
| Stats | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| Win % | 61.1% | 55.6% | 66.7% |
| Total Points Avg | 180.05 | 172.45 | 187.67 |
| Scored | 91.22 | 88.56 | 93.89 |
| Conceded | 88.83 | 83.89 | 93.78 |
| Pace Avg | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Off. Rating | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Def. Rating | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ATS Cover % | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Scoring consistency tracker
Last 10 games & full season
Sandringham Sabres is +15% better in terms of Points Scored
| Scored Per Game | Waverley Falcons | Sandringham Sabres |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 100% | 100% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 0% | 0% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 0% | 0% |
Sandringham Sabres is +16% better in terms of Points Scored
| Scored Per Game | Waverley Falcons | Sandringham Sabres |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 60% | 100% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 20% | 0% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 20% | 0% |
Sandringham Sabres is +1% better in terms of Points Scored
| Scored Per Game | Waverley Falcons | Sandringham Sabres |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 67% | 67% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 22% | 0% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 11% | 33% |
Sandringham Sabres is +1% better in terms of Points Scored
| Scored Per Game | Waverley Falcons | Sandringham Sabres |
|---|---|---|
| % Above Avg (+5%) | 67% | 67% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 22% | 0% |
| % Well below Avg (-5%) | 11% | 33% |
Offensive Efficiency & Shooting Profile
Where Teams Gain or Lose Value
Possession Control & Rebounding
Assists. Turnovers. Pace
Defensive Consistency vs Season Average
Last 10 & season games
Waverley Falcons is +7% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
| Conceded Per Game | Waverley Falcons | Sandringham Sabres |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 0% | 67% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 33% | 0% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 67% | 33% |
Waverley Falcons is +1% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
| Conceded Per Game | Waverley Falcons | Sandringham Sabres |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 40% | 60% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 20% | 20% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 40% | 20% |
Waverley Falcons is +5% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
| Conceded Per Game | Waverley Falcons | Sandringham Sabres |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 22% | 67% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 44% | 22% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 33% | 11% |
Waverley Falcons is +5% better defensively (fewer points conceded)
| Conceded Per Game | Waverley Falcons | Sandringham Sabres |
|---|---|---|
| % Below Avg (-5%) | 22% | 67% |
| % Around Avg (±5%) | 44% | 22% |
| % Well Above Avg (+7%) | 33% | 11% |
Defensive Matchup
Edge Style vs Style
Defensive Pressure & Disruption
Who Forces Mistakes?
Total Points Hit-Rate
Scoring trends 10 & seasone games
| Match Points | Waverley Falcons | Sandringham Sabres | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 150.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Over 160.5 | 100% | 89% | 94% |
| Over 170.5 | 100% | 67% | 83% |
| Over 180.5 | 56% | 56% | 56% |
| Over 190.5 | 11% | 44% | 28% |
| Over 200.5 | 0% | 44% | 22% |
| Over 210.5 | 0% | 22% | 11% |
| Over 220.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Waverley Falcons | Sandringham Sabres | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 150.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Under 160.5 | 0% | 11% | 6% |
| Under 170.5 | 0% | 33% | 17% |
| Under 180.5 | 44% | 44% | 44% |
| Under 190.5 | 89% | 56% | 72% |
| Under 200.5 | 100% | 56% | 78% |
| Under 210.5 | 100% | 78% | 89% |
| Under 220.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Match Points | Waverley Falcons | Sandringham Sabres | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 170.5 | 67% | 67% | 67% |
| Over 180.5 | 33% | 67% | 50% |
| Over 190.5 | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| Over 200.5 | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| Over 210.5 | 0% | 67% | 33% |
| Over 220.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Waverley Falcons | Sandringham Sabres | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 170.5 | 33% | 33% | 33% |
| Under 180.5 | 67% | 33% | 50% |
| Under 190.5 | 100% | 33% | 67% |
| Under 200.5 | 100% | 33% | 67% |
| Under 210.5 | 100% | 33% | 67% |
| Under 220.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Match Points | Waverley Falcons | Sandringham Sabres | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 160.5 | 80% | 80% | 80% |
| Over 170.5 | 80% | 60% | 70% |
| Over 180.5 | 20% | 60% | 40% |
| Over 190.5 | 0% | 60% | 30% |
| Over 200.5 | 0% | 60% | 30% |
| Over 210.5 | 0% | 40% | 20% |
| Over 220.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Waverley Falcons | Sandringham Sabres | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 160.5 | 20% | 20% | 20% |
| Under 170.5 | 20% | 40% | 30% |
| Under 180.5 | 80% | 40% | 60% |
| Under 190.5 | 100% | 40% | 70% |
| Under 200.5 | 100% | 40% | 70% |
| Under 210.5 | 100% | 60% | 80% |
| Under 220.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Match Points | Waverley Falcons | Sandringham Sabres | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 150.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Over 160.5 | 100% | 89% | 94% |
| Over 170.5 | 100% | 67% | 83% |
| Over 180.5 | 56% | 56% | 56% |
| Over 190.5 | 11% | 44% | 28% |
| Over 200.5 | 0% | 44% | 22% |
| Over 210.5 | 0% | 22% | 11% |
| Over 220.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Match Points | Waverley Falcons | Sandringham Sabres | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 150.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Under 160.5 | 0% | 11% | 6% |
| Under 170.5 | 0% | 33% | 17% |
| Under 180.5 | 44% | 44% | 44% |
| Under 190.5 | 89% | 56% | 72% |
| Under 200.5 | 100% | 56% | 78% |
| Under 210.5 | 100% | 78% | 89% |
| Under 220.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| # | Team | W | L | PCT | PPG | OPP PPG | DIFF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Knox Raiders | 17 | 5 | 0.773 | 91.7 | 84.4 | - |
| 2 | Mt Gambier | 16 | 6 | 0.727 | 96.5 | 82.4 | - |
| 3 | Kilsyth Cobras | 14 | 8 | 0.636 | 89.3 | 86.0 | - |
| 4 | Eltham Wildcats | 14 | 8 | 0.636 | 89.9 | 85.6 | - |
| 5 | Sandringham Sabres | 14 | 8 | 0.636 | 94.1 | 89.9 | - |
| 6 | Melbourne Tigers | 14 | 8 | 0.636 | 87.6 | 82.1 | - |
| 7 | Ballarat Miners | 14 | 8 | 0.636 | 87.9 | 88.9 | - |
| 8 | Hobart Chargers | 12 | 9 | 0.571 | 88.7 | 86.5 | - |
| 9 | Nunawading Spectres | 11 | 11 | 0.500 | 87.4 | 86.4 | - |
| 10 | Ringwood Hawks | 11 | 11 | 0.500 | 95.1 | 90.8 | - |
| 11 | Casey Cavaliers | 11 | 11 | 0.500 | 87.8 | 86.4 | - |
| 12 | Frankston Blues | 10 | 12 | 0.455 | 92.6 | 91.0 | - |
| 13 | Waverley Falcons | 9 | 13 | 0.409 | 93.7 | 96.6 | - |
| 14 | Dandenong Rangers | 8 | 14 | 0.364 | 91.1 | 95.5 | - |
| 15 | Keilor Thunder | 8 | 14 | 0.364 | 82.4 | 88.1 | - |
| 16 | Bendigo Braves | 8 | 14 | 0.364 | 81.7 | 94.3 | - |
| 17 | Geelong Supercats | 7 | 15 | 0.318 | 81.9 | 88.5 | - |
| 18 | NW Tasmania Thunder | 5 | 16 | 0.238 | 86.5 | 92.4 | - |
| 19 | Diamond Valley Eagles | 5 | 17 | 0.227 | 84.5 | 95.0 | - |